Internal Safety Override
- Status: active for local use.
- Keep operation local by default. Do not read secrets or transmit repository content externally without explicit opt-in.
- Audit categories: secrets.
Risk Management Specialist
ISO 14971:2019 risk management implementation throughout the medical device lifecycle.
Table of Contents
Risk Management Planning Workflow
Establish risk management process per ISO 14971.
Workflow: Create Risk Management Plan
- Define scope of risk management activities:
- Medical device identification
- Lifecycle stages covered
- Applicable standards and regulations
- Establish risk acceptability criteria:
- Define probability categories (P1-P5)
- Define severity categories (S1-S5)
- Create risk matrix with acceptance thresholds
- Assign responsibilities:
- Risk management lead
- Subject matter experts
- Approval authorities
- Define verification activities:
- Methods for control verification
- Acceptance criteria
- Plan production and post-production activities:
- Information sources
- Review triggers
- Update procedures
- Obtain plan approval
- Establish risk management file
- Validation: Plan approved; acceptability criteria defined; responsibilities assigned; file established
Risk Management Plan Content
| Section |
Content |
Evidence |
| Scope |
Device and lifecycle coverage |
Scope statement |
| Criteria |
Risk acceptability matrix |
Risk matrix document |
| Responsibilities |
Roles and authorities |
RACI chart |
| Verification |
Methods and acceptance |
Verification plan |
| Production/Post-Production |
Monitoring activities |
Surveillance plan |
Risk Acceptability Matrix (5x5)
| Probability \ Severity |
Negligible |
Minor |
Serious |
Critical |
Catastrophic |
| Frequent (P5) |
Medium |
High |
High |
Unacceptable |
Unacceptable |
| Probable (P4) |
Medium |
Medium |
High |
High |
Unacceptable |
| Occasional (P3) |
Low |
Medium |
Medium |
High |
High |
| Remote (P2) |
Low |
Low |
Medium |
Medium |
High |
| Improbable (P1) |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Medium |
Medium |
Risk Level Actions
| Level |
Acceptable |
Action Required |
| Low |
Yes |
Document and accept |
| Medium |
ALARP |
Reduce if practicable; document rationale |
| High |
ALARP |
Reduction required; demonstrate ALARP |
| Unacceptable |
No |
Design change mandatory |
Risk Analysis Workflow
Identify hazards and estimate risks systematically.
Workflow: Conduct Risk Analysis
- Define intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse:
- Medical indication
- Patient population
- User population
- Use environment
- Select analysis method(s):
- FMEA for component/function analysis
- FTA for system-level analysis
- HAZOP for process deviations
- Use Error Analysis for user interaction
- Identify hazards by category:
- Energy hazards (electrical, mechanical, thermal)
- Biological hazards (bioburden, biocompatibility)
- Chemical hazards (residues, leachables)
- Operational hazards (software, use errors)
- Determine hazardous situations:
- Sequence of events
- Foreseeable misuse scenarios
- Single fault conditions
- Estimate probability of harm (P1-P5)
- Estimate severity of harm (S1-S5)
- Document in hazard analysis worksheet
- Validation: All hazard categories addressed; all hazards documented; probability and severity assigned
Hazard Categories Checklist
| Category |
Examples |
Analyzed |
| Electrical |
Shock, burns, interference |
☐ |
| Mechanical |
Crushing, cutting, entrapment |
☐ |
| Thermal |
Burns, tissue damage |
☐ |
| Radiation |
Ionizing, non-ionizing |
☐ |
| Biological |
Infection, biocompatibility |
☐ |
| Chemical |
Toxicity, irritation |
☐ |
| Software |
Incorrect output, timing |
☐ |
| Use Error |
Misuse, perception, cognition |
☐ |
| Environment |
EMC, mechanical stress |
☐ |
Analysis Method Selection
| Situation |
Recommended Method |
| Component failures |
FMEA |
| System-level failure |
FTA |
| Process deviations |
HAZOP |
| User interaction |
Use Error Analysis |
| Software behavior |
Software FMEA |
| Early design phase |
PHA |
Probability Criteria
| Level |
Name |
Description |
Frequency |
| P5 |
Frequent |
Expected to occur |
>10⁻³ |
| P4 |
Probable |
Likely to occur |
10⁻³ to 10⁻⁴ |
| P3 |
Occasional |
May occur |
10⁻⁴ to 10⁻⁵ |
| P2 |
Remote |
Unlikely |
10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁶ |
| P1 |
Improbable |
Very unlikely |
<10⁻⁶ |
Severity Criteria
| Level |
Name |
Description |
Harm |
| S5 |
Catastrophic |
Death |
Death |
| S4 |
Critical |
Permanent impairment |
Irreversible injury |
| S3 |
Serious |
Injury requiring intervention |
Reversible injury |
| S2 |
Minor |
Temporary discomfort |
No treatment needed |
| S1 |
Negligible |
Inconvenience |
No injury |
See: references/risk-analysis-methods.md
Risk Evaluation Workflow
Evaluate risks against acceptability criteria.
Workflow: Evaluate Identified Risks
- Calculate initial risk level from probability × severity
- Compare to risk acceptability criteria
- For each risk, determine:
- Acceptable: Document and accept
- ALARP: Proceed to risk control
- Unacceptable: Mandatory risk control
- Document evaluation rationale
- Identify risks requiring benefit-risk analysis
- Complete benefit-risk analysis if applicable
- Compile risk evaluation summary
- Validation: All risks evaluated; acceptability determined; rationale documented
Risk Evaluation Decision Tree
Risk Estimated
│
▼
Apply Acceptability Criteria
│
├── Low Risk ──────────► Accept and document
│
├── Medium Risk ───────► Consider risk reduction
│ │ Document ALARP if not reduced
│ ▼
│ Practicable to reduce?
│ │
│ Yes──► Implement control
│ No───► Document ALARP rationale
│
├── High Risk ─────────► Risk reduction required
│ │ Must demonstrate ALARP
│ ▼
│ Implement control
│ Verify residual risk
│
└── Unacceptable ──────► Design change mandatory
Cannot proceed without control
ALARP Demonstration Requirements
| Criterion |
Evidence Required |
| Technical feasibility |
Analysis of alternative controls |
| Proportionality |
Cost-benefit of further reduction |
| State of the art |
Comparison to similar devices |
| Stakeholder input |
Clinical/user perspectives |
Benefit-Risk Analysis Triggers
| Situation |
Benefit-Risk Required |
| Residual risk remains high |
Yes |
| No feasible risk reduction |
Yes |
| Novel device |
Yes |
| Unacceptable risk with clinical benefit |
Yes |
| All risks low |
No |
Risk Control Workflow
Implement and verify risk control measures.
Workflow: Implement Risk Controls
- Identify risk control options:
- Inherent safety by design (Priority 1)
- Protective measures in device (Priority 2)
- Information for safety (Priority 3)
- Select optimal control following hierarchy
- Analyze control for new hazards introduced
- Document control in design requirements
- Implement control in design
- Develop verification protocol
- Execute verification and document results
- Evaluate residual risk with control in place
- Validation: Control implemented; verification passed; residual risk acceptable; no unaddressed new hazards
Risk Control Hierarchy
| Priority |
Control Type |
Examples |
Effectiveness |
| 1 |
Inherent Safety |
Eliminate hazard, fail-safe design |
Highest |
| 2 |
Protective Measures |
Guards, alarms, automatic shutdown |
High |
| 3 |
Information |
Warnings, training, IFU |
Lower |
Risk Control Option Analysis Template
RISK CONTROL OPTION ANALYSIS
Hazard ID: H-[XXX]
Hazard: [Description]
Initial Risk: P[X] × S[X] = [Level]
OPTIONS CONSIDERED:
| Option | Control Type | New Hazards | Feasibility | Selected |
|--------|--------------|-------------|-------------|----------|
| 1 | [Type] | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No] |
| 2 | [Type] | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No] |
SELECTED CONTROL: Option [X]
Rationale: [Justification for selection]
IMPLEMENTATION:
- Requirement: [REQ-XXX]
- Design Document: [Reference]
VERIFICATION:
- Method: [Test/Analysis/Review]
- Protocol: [Reference]
- Acceptance Criteria: [Criteria]
Risk Control Verification Methods
| Method |
When to Use |
Evidence |
| Test |
Quantifiable performance |
Test report |
| Inspection |
Physical presence |
Inspection record |
| Analysis |
Design calculation |
Analysis report |
| Review |
Documentation check |
Review record |
Residual Risk Evaluation
| After Control |
Action |
| Acceptable |
Document, proceed |
| ALARP achieved |
Document rationale, proceed |
| Still unacceptable |
Additional control or design change |
| New hazard introduced |
Analyze and control new hazard |
Post-Production Risk Management
Monitor and update risk management throughout product lifecycle.
Workflow: Post-Production Risk Monitoring
- Identify information sources:
- Customer complaints
- Service reports
- Vigilance/adverse events
- Literature monitoring
- Clinical studies
- Establish collection procedures
- Define review triggers:
- New hazard identified
- Increased frequency of known hazard
- Serious incident
- Regulatory feedback
- Analyze incoming information for risk relevance
- Update risk management file as needed
- Communicate significant findings
- Conduct periodic risk management review
- Validation: Information sources monitored; file current; reviews completed per schedule
Information Sources
| Source |
Information Type |
Review Frequency |
| Complaints |
Use issues, failures |
Continuous |
| Service |
Field failures, repairs |
Monthly |
| Vigilance |
Serious incidents |
Immediate |
| Literature |
Similar device issues |
Quarterly |
| Regulatory |
Authority feedback |
As received |
| Clinical |
PMCF data |
Per plan |
Risk Management File Update Triggers
| Trigger |
Response Time |
Action |
| Serious incident |
Immediate |
Full risk review |
| New hazard identified |
30 days |
Risk analysis update |
| Trend increase |
60 days |
Trend analysis |
| Design change |
Before implementation |
Impact assessment |
| Standards update |
Per transition period |
Gap analysis |
Periodic Review Requirements
| Review Element |
Frequency |
| Risk management file completeness |
Annual |
| Risk control effectiveness |
Annual |
| Post-market information analysis |
Quarterly |
| Risk-benefit conclusions |
Annual or on new data |
Risk Assessment Templates
→ See references/risk-assessment-templates.md for details
Decision Frameworks
Risk Control Selection
What is the risk level?
│
├── Unacceptable ──► Can hazard be eliminated?
│ │
│ Yes─┴─No
│ │ │
│ ▼ ▼
│ Eliminate Can protective
│ hazard measure reduce?
│ │
│ Yes─┴─No
│ │ │
│ ▼ ▼
│ Add Add warning
│ protection + training
│
└── High/Medium ──► Apply hierarchy
starting at Level 1
New Hazard Analysis
| Question |
If Yes |
If No |
| Does control introduce new hazard? |
Analyze new hazard |
Proceed |
| Is new risk higher than original? |
Reject control option |
Acceptable trade-off |
| Can new hazard be controlled? |
Add control |
Reject control option |
Risk Acceptability Decision
| Condition |
Decision |
| All risks Low |
Acceptable |
| Medium risks with ALARP |
Acceptable |
| High risks with ALARP documented |
Acceptable if benefits outweigh |
| Any Unacceptable residual |
Not acceptable - redesign |
Tools and References
Scripts
| Tool |
Purpose |
Usage |
| risk_matrix_calculator.py |
Calculate risk levels and FMEA RPN |
python risk_matrix_calculator.py --help |
Risk Matrix Calculator Features:
- ISO 14971 5x5 risk matrix calculation
- FMEA RPN (Risk Priority Number) calculation
- Interactive mode for guided assessment
- Display risk criteria definitions
- JSON output for integration
References
| Document |
Content |
| iso14971-implementation-guide.md |
Complete ISO 14971:2019 implementation with templates |
| risk-analysis-methods.md |
FMEA, FTA, HAZOP, Use Error Analysis methods |
Quick Reference: ISO 14971 Process
| Stage |
Key Activities |
Output |
| Planning |
Define scope, criteria, responsibilities |
Risk Management Plan |
| Analysis |
Identify hazards, estimate risk |
Hazard Analysis |
| Evaluation |
Compare to criteria, ALARP assessment |
Risk Evaluation |
| Control |
Implement hierarchy, verify |
Risk Control Records |
| Residual |
Overall assessment, benefit-risk |
Risk Management Report |
| Production |
Monitor, review, update |
Updated RM File |
Related Skills
1---2name: risk-management-specialist3description: Medical device risk management specialist implementing ISO 14971 throughout product lifecycle. Provides risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk control, and post-production information analysis. Use when user mentions risk management, ISO 14971, risk analysis, FMEA, fault tree analysis, hazard identification, risk control, risk matrix, benefit-risk analysis, residual risk, risk acceptability, or post-market risk.4---56## Internal Safety Override78- Status: active for local use.9- Keep operation local by default. Do not read secrets or transmit repository content externally without explicit opt-in.10- Audit categories: secrets.1112# Risk Management Specialist1314ISO 14971:2019 risk management implementation throughout the medical device lifecycle.1516---1718## Table of Contents1920- [Risk Management Planning Workflow](#risk-management-planning-workflow)21- [Risk Analysis Workflow](#risk-analysis-workflow)22- [Risk Evaluation Workflow](#risk-evaluation-workflow)23- [Risk Control Workflow](#risk-control-workflow)24- [Post-Production Risk Management](#post-production-risk-management)25- [Risk Assessment Templates](#risk-assessment-templates)26- [Decision Frameworks](#decision-frameworks)27- [Tools and References](#tools-and-references)2829---3031## Risk Management Planning Workflow3233Establish risk management process per ISO 14971.3435### Workflow: Create Risk Management Plan36371. Define scope of risk management activities:38 - Medical device identification39 - Lifecycle stages covered40 - Applicable standards and regulations412. Establish risk acceptability criteria:42 - Define probability categories (P1-P5)43 - Define severity categories (S1-S5)44 - Create risk matrix with acceptance thresholds453. Assign responsibilities:46 - Risk management lead47 - Subject matter experts48 - Approval authorities494. Define verification activities:50 - Methods for control verification51 - Acceptance criteria525. Plan production and post-production activities:53 - Information sources54 - Review triggers55 - Update procedures566. Obtain plan approval577. Establish risk management file588. **Validation:** Plan approved; acceptability criteria defined; responsibilities assigned; file established5960### Risk Management Plan Content6162| Section | Content | Evidence |63|---------|---------|----------|64| Scope | Device and lifecycle coverage | Scope statement |65| Criteria | Risk acceptability matrix | Risk matrix document |66| Responsibilities | Roles and authorities | RACI chart |67| Verification | Methods and acceptance | Verification plan |68| Production/Post-Production | Monitoring activities | Surveillance plan |6970### Risk Acceptability Matrix (5x5)7172| Probability \ Severity | Negligible | Minor | Serious | Critical | Catastrophic |73|------------------------|------------|-------|---------|----------|--------------|74| **Frequent (P5)** | Medium | High | High | Unacceptable | Unacceptable |75| **Probable (P4)** | Medium | Medium | High | High | Unacceptable |76| **Occasional (P3)** | Low | Medium | Medium | High | High |77| **Remote (P2)** | Low | Low | Medium | Medium | High |78| **Improbable (P1)** | Low | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |7980### Risk Level Actions8182| Level | Acceptable | Action Required |83|-------|------------|-----------------|84| Low | Yes | Document and accept |85| Medium | ALARP | Reduce if practicable; document rationale |86| High | ALARP | Reduction required; demonstrate ALARP |87| Unacceptable | No | Design change mandatory |8889---9091## Risk Analysis Workflow9293Identify hazards and estimate risks systematically.9495### Workflow: Conduct Risk Analysis96971. Define intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse:98 - Medical indication99 - Patient population100 - User population101 - Use environment1022. Select analysis method(s):103 - FMEA for component/function analysis104 - FTA for system-level analysis105 - HAZOP for process deviations106 - Use Error Analysis for user interaction1073. Identify hazards by category:108 - Energy hazards (electrical, mechanical, thermal)109 - Biological hazards (bioburden, biocompatibility)110 - Chemical hazards (residues, leachables)111 - Operational hazards (software, use errors)1124. Determine hazardous situations:113 - Sequence of events114 - Foreseeable misuse scenarios115 - Single fault conditions1165. Estimate probability of harm (P1-P5)1176. Estimate severity of harm (S1-S5)1187. Document in hazard analysis worksheet1198. **Validation:** All hazard categories addressed; all hazards documented; probability and severity assigned120121### Hazard Categories Checklist122123| Category | Examples | Analyzed |124|----------|----------|----------|125| Electrical | Shock, burns, interference | ☐ |126| Mechanical | Crushing, cutting, entrapment | ☐ |127| Thermal | Burns, tissue damage | ☐ |128| Radiation | Ionizing, non-ionizing | ☐ |129| Biological | Infection, biocompatibility | ☐ |130| Chemical | Toxicity, irritation | ☐ |131| Software | Incorrect output, timing | ☐ |132| Use Error | Misuse, perception, cognition | ☐ |133| Environment | EMC, mechanical stress | ☐ |134135### Analysis Method Selection136137| Situation | Recommended Method |138|-----------|-------------------|139| Component failures | FMEA |140| System-level failure | FTA |141| Process deviations | HAZOP |142| User interaction | Use Error Analysis |143| Software behavior | Software FMEA |144| Early design phase | PHA |145146### Probability Criteria147148| Level | Name | Description | Frequency |149|-------|------|-------------|-----------|150| P5 | Frequent | Expected to occur | >10⁻³ |151| P4 | Probable | Likely to occur | 10⁻³ to 10⁻⁴ |152| P3 | Occasional | May occur | 10⁻⁴ to 10⁻⁵ |153| P2 | Remote | Unlikely | 10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁶ |154| P1 | Improbable | Very unlikely | <10⁻⁶ |155156### Severity Criteria157158| Level | Name | Description | Harm |159|-------|------|-------------|------|160| S5 | Catastrophic | Death | Death |161| S4 | Critical | Permanent impairment | Irreversible injury |162| S3 | Serious | Injury requiring intervention | Reversible injury |163| S2 | Minor | Temporary discomfort | No treatment needed |164| S1 | Negligible | Inconvenience | No injury |165166See: [references/risk-analysis-methods.md](references/risk-analysis-methods.md)167168---169170## Risk Evaluation Workflow171172Evaluate risks against acceptability criteria.173174### Workflow: Evaluate Identified Risks1751761. Calculate initial risk level from probability × severity1772. Compare to risk acceptability criteria1783. For each risk, determine:179 - Acceptable: Document and accept180 - ALARP: Proceed to risk control181 - Unacceptable: Mandatory risk control1824. Document evaluation rationale1835. Identify risks requiring benefit-risk analysis1846. Complete benefit-risk analysis if applicable1857. Compile risk evaluation summary1868. **Validation:** All risks evaluated; acceptability determined; rationale documented187188### Risk Evaluation Decision Tree189190```191Risk Estimated192 │193 ▼194Apply Acceptability Criteria195 │196 ├── Low Risk ──────────► Accept and document197 │198 ├── Medium Risk ───────► Consider risk reduction199 │ │ Document ALARP if not reduced200 │ ▼201 │ Practicable to reduce?202 │ │203 │ Yes──► Implement control204 │ No───► Document ALARP rationale205 │206 ├── High Risk ─────────► Risk reduction required207 │ │ Must demonstrate ALARP208 │ ▼209 │ Implement control210 │ Verify residual risk211 │212 └── Unacceptable ──────► Design change mandatory213 Cannot proceed without control214```215216### ALARP Demonstration Requirements217218| Criterion | Evidence Required |219|-----------|-------------------|220| Technical feasibility | Analysis of alternative controls |221| Proportionality | Cost-benefit of further reduction |222| State of the art | Comparison to similar devices |223| Stakeholder input | Clinical/user perspectives |224225### Benefit-Risk Analysis Triggers226227| Situation | Benefit-Risk Required |228|-----------|----------------------|229| Residual risk remains high | Yes |230| No feasible risk reduction | Yes |231| Novel device | Yes |232| Unacceptable risk with clinical benefit | Yes |233| All risks low | No |234235---236237## Risk Control Workflow238239Implement and verify risk control measures.240241### Workflow: Implement Risk Controls2422431. Identify risk control options:244 - Inherent safety by design (Priority 1)245 - Protective measures in device (Priority 2)246 - Information for safety (Priority 3)2472. Select optimal control following hierarchy2483. Analyze control for new hazards introduced2494. Document control in design requirements2505. Implement control in design2516. Develop verification protocol2527. Execute verification and document results2538. Evaluate residual risk with control in place2549. **Validation:** Control implemented; verification passed; residual risk acceptable; no unaddressed new hazards255256### Risk Control Hierarchy257258| Priority | Control Type | Examples | Effectiveness |259|----------|--------------|----------|---------------|260| 1 | Inherent Safety | Eliminate hazard, fail-safe design | Highest |261| 2 | Protective Measures | Guards, alarms, automatic shutdown | High |262| 3 | Information | Warnings, training, IFU | Lower |263264### Risk Control Option Analysis Template265266```267RISK CONTROL OPTION ANALYSIS268269Hazard ID: H-[XXX]270Hazard: [Description]271Initial Risk: P[X] × S[X] = [Level]272273OPTIONS CONSIDERED:274| Option | Control Type | New Hazards | Feasibility | Selected |275|--------|--------------|-------------|-------------|----------|276| 1 | [Type] | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No] |277| 2 | [Type] | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No] |278279SELECTED CONTROL: Option [X]280Rationale: [Justification for selection]281282IMPLEMENTATION:283- Requirement: [REQ-XXX]284- Design Document: [Reference]285286VERIFICATION:287- Method: [Test/Analysis/Review]288- Protocol: [Reference]289- Acceptance Criteria: [Criteria]290```291292### Risk Control Verification Methods293294| Method | When to Use | Evidence |295|--------|-------------|----------|296| Test | Quantifiable performance | Test report |297| Inspection | Physical presence | Inspection record |298| Analysis | Design calculation | Analysis report |299| Review | Documentation check | Review record |300301### Residual Risk Evaluation302303| After Control | Action |304|---------------|--------|305| Acceptable | Document, proceed |306| ALARP achieved | Document rationale, proceed |307| Still unacceptable | Additional control or design change |308| New hazard introduced | Analyze and control new hazard |309310---311312## Post-Production Risk Management313314Monitor and update risk management throughout product lifecycle.315316### Workflow: Post-Production Risk Monitoring3173181. Identify information sources:319 - Customer complaints320 - Service reports321 - Vigilance/adverse events322 - Literature monitoring323 - Clinical studies3242. Establish collection procedures3253. Define review triggers:326 - New hazard identified327 - Increased frequency of known hazard328 - Serious incident329 - Regulatory feedback3304. Analyze incoming information for risk relevance3315. Update risk management file as needed3326. Communicate significant findings3337. Conduct periodic risk management review3348. **Validation:** Information sources monitored; file current; reviews completed per schedule335336### Information Sources337338| Source | Information Type | Review Frequency |339|--------|------------------|------------------|340| Complaints | Use issues, failures | Continuous |341| Service | Field failures, repairs | Monthly |342| Vigilance | Serious incidents | Immediate |343| Literature | Similar device issues | Quarterly |344| Regulatory | Authority feedback | As received |345| Clinical | PMCF data | Per plan |346347### Risk Management File Update Triggers348349| Trigger | Response Time | Action |350|---------|---------------|--------|351| Serious incident | Immediate | Full risk review |352| New hazard identified | 30 days | Risk analysis update |353| Trend increase | 60 days | Trend analysis |354| Design change | Before implementation | Impact assessment |355| Standards update | Per transition period | Gap analysis |356357### Periodic Review Requirements358359| Review Element | Frequency |360|----------------|-----------|361| Risk management file completeness | Annual |362| Risk control effectiveness | Annual |363| Post-market information analysis | Quarterly |364| Risk-benefit conclusions | Annual or on new data |365366---367368## Risk Assessment Templates369→ See references/risk-assessment-templates.md for details370371## Decision Frameworks372373### Risk Control Selection374375```376What is the risk level?377 │378 ├── Unacceptable ──► Can hazard be eliminated?379 │ │380 │ Yes─┴─No381 │ │ │382 │ ▼ ▼383 │ Eliminate Can protective384 │ hazard measure reduce?385 │ │386 │ Yes─┴─No387 │ │ │388 │ ▼ ▼389 │ Add Add warning390 │ protection + training391 │392 └── High/Medium ──► Apply hierarchy393 starting at Level 1394```395396### New Hazard Analysis397398| Question | If Yes | If No |399|----------|--------|-------|400| Does control introduce new hazard? | Analyze new hazard | Proceed |401| Is new risk higher than original? | Reject control option | Acceptable trade-off |402| Can new hazard be controlled? | Add control | Reject control option |403404### Risk Acceptability Decision405406| Condition | Decision |407|-----------|----------|408| All risks Low | Acceptable |409| Medium risks with ALARP | Acceptable |410| High risks with ALARP documented | Acceptable if benefits outweigh |411| Any Unacceptable residual | Not acceptable - redesign |412413---414415## Tools and References416417### Scripts418419| Tool | Purpose | Usage |420|------|---------|-------|421| [risk_matrix_calculator.py](scripts/risk_matrix_calculator.py) | Calculate risk levels and FMEA RPN | `python risk_matrix_calculator.py --help` |422423**Risk Matrix Calculator Features:**424- ISO 14971 5x5 risk matrix calculation425- FMEA RPN (Risk Priority Number) calculation426- Interactive mode for guided assessment427- Display risk criteria definitions428- JSON output for integration429430### References431432| Document | Content |433|----------|---------|434| [iso14971-implementation-guide.md](references/iso14971-implementation-guide.md) | Complete ISO 14971:2019 implementation with templates |435| [risk-analysis-methods.md](references/risk-analysis-methods.md) | FMEA, FTA, HAZOP, Use Error Analysis methods |436437### Quick Reference: ISO 14971 Process438439| Stage | Key Activities | Output |440|-------|----------------|--------|441| Planning | Define scope, criteria, responsibilities | Risk Management Plan |442| Analysis | Identify hazards, estimate risk | Hazard Analysis |443| Evaluation | Compare to criteria, ALARP assessment | Risk Evaluation |444| Control | Implement hierarchy, verify | Risk Control Records |445| Residual | Overall assessment, benefit-risk | Risk Management Report |446| Production | Monitor, review, update | Updated RM File |447448---449450## Related Skills451452| Skill | Integration Point |453|-------|-------------------|454| [quality-manager-qms-iso13485](../quality-manager-qms-iso13485/) | QMS integration |455| [capa-officer](../capa-officer/) | Risk-based CAPA |456| [regulatory-affairs-head](../regulatory-affairs-head/) | Regulatory submissions |457| [quality-documentation-manager](../quality-documentation-manager/) | Risk file management |