Salesforce Data Operations Expert (sf-data) (Brite edition)
Use this skill when the user needs Salesforce data work: record CRUD, bulk import/export, test data generation, cleanup scripts, or data factory patterns for validating Apex, Flow, or integration behavior.
Brite Context
- HubSpot migration is complete (Phase 1 2026-03-20, Phase 2 2026-03-24) — see Rule 1 for ETL layout.
- HubSpot emails surface as Task, not EmailMessage — see Rule 2 (loads) and Rule 3 (
setSaveAsActivityoutbound). - Bulk API has session-permset and audit-field gotchas — see Rules 4 and 5.
- Task re-parenting follows
WhatId, not Contact — see Rule 7.
See also: sf-soql for query-only work (no record mutations); sf-integration for the Email Bison → OutboundSync handshake that produces Tasks; sf-permissions for the 7-permset FLS sync discipline.
Brite Data Discipline
1. HubSpot migration architecture
ETL scripts in brite-salesforce/scripts/migration/ are layered: extract/ (HubSpot pull), transform/ (Brite mapping), load/ (SF push), validate/ (post-load reconciliation), fix/ (drift remediation), coverage/ (Jest mapping coverage). When asked "load 5000 records into Salesforce" or "fix migration drift," reference these scripts as the starting point — do not author one-off load scripts.
2. HubSpot emails migrate as Task, not EmailMessage
HubSpot email engagements load as Task records with Type: "Email". EmailMessage requires hs_email_from, hs_email_to, and EmailMessageRelation junction records — Salesforce only renders native email icons/threading for that object. The migration's Task-shape choice is intentional. Source: §Metadata Authoring line 143.
3. Messaging.SingleEmailMessage + setSaveAsActivity(false) → no EmailMessage record AND no Task activity
Outbound emails sent this way leave zero rows in both objects. The ONLY monitoring path is Setup → Email Logs (24-hour rolling window). Do not instruct triagers to "check the EmailMessage object" — they'll find nothing and assume the notification silently failed. NewsletterSignupNotificationService is the current example. See docs/artifacts/email-notification-matrix.md. Source: §Metadata Authoring line 144.
4. Bulk API does not honor session-based permsets
HubSpot_Migration permset has hasActivationRequired:true — activation only happens per UI session via SessionPermissionSetActivation, NOT in Bulk API or sf CLI sessions. For data loads that need the bypass, verify with FeatureManagement.checkPermission() first; workarounds: (a) sf data create record (single REST call), (b) patch the data, (c) temporarily flip hasActivationRequired:false. Source: §Permissions & Security line 175.
5. CreateAuditFields is INSERT-only
API name is capitalized (createAuditFields is rejected at deploy time with "Unknown user permission"). Records inserted without the permission must be DELETED and re-inserted to set CreatedDate — upsert takes the UPDATE path for existing records and silently leaves CreatedDate unchanged. Requires the org-level "Set Audit Fields upon Record Creation" toggle enabled in Setup → User Interface. Verified during BC-2744. Source: §Permissions & Security line 176.
6. Bulk API empty CSV cells = "skip", not "set null"; use #N/A for null
Leaving a field empty in sf data update bulk CSVs causes Bulk API v1 to NOT UPDATE that field. To actually null out a field via bulk update, the cell must be literally #N/A. Common trap when writing migration/cleanup scripts that need to null foreign keys (WhatId, AccountId, OwnerId). Verified during drift audit 2026-04-24. Source: §Apex & Automation line 193.
7. Task.AccountId follows Task.WhatId, not Contact.AccountId
Task.AccountId is set at creation from WhatId (or derived from the WhoId Contact's AccountId at that moment) and does not cascade when the related Contact's AccountId later changes. To re-parent Tasks, explicitly UPDATE Task SET WhatId = :newAccountId — WhatId is polymorphic and Account is a valid target. Setting WhatId = null ALSO nulls AccountId, orphaning the task. Verified during BC-5545 contact re-parenting. Source: §Apex & Automation lines 191-192.
8. Salesforce seed sample data may carry real correspondence
Orgs provisioned with default sample data (Acme (Sample), salesforce.com (Sample), Global Media (Sample)) can accumulate real emails via HubSpot / Email Bison domain matching. Before deleting seed Accounts, ALWAYS check: SELECT COUNT() FROM Task WHERE Account.Name = '...' AND Subject LIKE 'Email:%'. Preserve by re-parenting Tasks (UPDATE Task SET WhatId = [AccountId]) and EmailMessages (UPDATE EmailMessage SET RelatedToId = [AccountId]) before the cascade. Verified during drift audit 2026-04-24: salesforce.com (Sample) had 58 real Slack/FSL emails mixed with 2 seed tasks. Source: §Metadata Authoring line 130.
When This Skill Owns the Task
Use sf-data when the work involves:
sf dataCLI commands- record creation, update, delete, upsert, export, or tree import/export
- realistic test data generation
- bulk data operations and cleanup
- Apex anonymous scripts for data seeding / rollback
Delegate elsewhere when the user is:
- writing SOQL only → sf-soql
- running or repairing Apex tests → sf-testing
- deploying metadata first → sf-deploy
- discovering schema / field definitions → sf-metadata
Important Mode Decision
Confirm which mode the user wants:
| Mode | Use when |
|---|---|
| Script generation | they want reusable .apex, CSV, or JSON assets without touching an org yet |
| Remote execution | they want records created / changed in a real org now |
Do not assume remote execution if the user may only want scripts.
Required Context to Gather First
Ask for or infer:
- target object(s)
- org alias, if remote execution is required
- operation type: query, create, update, delete, upsert, import, export, cleanup
- expected volume
- whether this is test data, migration data, or one-off troubleshooting data
- any parent-child relationships that must exist first
Core Operating Rules
sf-dataacts on remote org data unless the user explicitly wants local script generation.- Objects and fields must already exist before data creation.
- For automation testing, prefer 251+ records when bulk behavior matters.
- Always think about cleanup before creating large or noisy datasets.
- Never use real PII in generated test data.
- Prefer CLI-first for straightforward CRUD; use anonymous Apex when the operation truly needs server-side orchestration.
If metadata is missing, stop and hand off to:
Recommended Workflow
1. Verify prerequisites
Confirm object / field availability, org auth, and required parent records.
2. Run describe-first pre-flight validation when schema is uncertain
Before creating or updating records, use object describe data to validate:
- required fields
- createable vs non-createable fields
- picklist values
- relationship fields and parent requirements
Example pattern:
sf sobject describe --sobject ObjectName --target-org <alias> --json
Helpful filters:
# Required + createable fields
jq '.result.fields[] | select(.nillable==false and .createable==true) | {name, type}'
# Valid picklist values for one field
jq '.result.fields[] | select(.name=="StageName") | .picklistValues[].value'
# Fields that cannot be set on create
jq '.result.fields[] | select(.createable==false) | .name'
3. Choose the smallest correct mechanism
| Need | Default approach |
|---|---|
| small one-off CRUD | sf data single-record commands |
| large import/export | Bulk API 2.0 via sf data ... bulk |
| parent-child seed set | tree import/export |
| reusable test dataset | factory / anonymous Apex script |
| reversible experiment | cleanup script or savepoint-based approach |
4. Execute or generate assets
Use the built-in templates under assets/ when they fit:
assets/factories/assets/bulk/assets/cleanup/assets/soql/assets/csv/assets/json/
5. Verify results
Check counts, relationships, and record IDs after creation or update.
6. Apply a bounded retry strategy
If creation fails:
- try the primary CLI shape once
- retry once with corrected parameters
- re-run describe / validate assumptions
- pivot to a different mechanism or provide a manual workaround
Do not repeat the same failing command indefinitely.
7. Leave cleanup guidance
Provide exact cleanup commands or rollback assets whenever data was created.
High-Signal Rules
Bulk safety
- use bulk operations for large volumes
- test automation-sensitive behavior with 251+ records where appropriate
- avoid one-record-at-a-time patterns for bulk scenarios
Data integrity
- include required fields
- validate picklist values before creation
- verify parent IDs and relationship integrity
- account for validation rules and duplicate constraints
- exclude non-createable fields from input payloads
Cleanup discipline
Prefer one of:
- delete-by-ID
- delete-by-pattern
- delete-by-created-date window
- rollback / savepoint patterns for script-based test runs
Common Failure Patterns
| Error | Likely cause | Default fix direction |
|---|---|---|
INVALID_FIELD |
wrong field API name or FLS issue | verify schema and access |
REQUIRED_FIELD_MISSING |
mandatory field omitted | include required values from describe data |
INVALID_CROSS_REFERENCE_KEY |
bad parent ID | create / verify parent first |
FIELD_CUSTOM_VALIDATION_EXCEPTION |
validation rule blocked the record | use valid test data or adjust setup |
| invalid picklist value | guessed value instead of describe-backed value | inspect picklist values first |
| non-writeable field error | field is not createable / updateable | remove it from the payload |
| bulk limits / timeouts | wrong tool for the volume | switch to bulk / staged import |
Output Format
When finishing, report in this order:
- Operation performed
- Objects and counts
- Target org or local artifact path
- Record IDs / output files
- Verification result
- Cleanup instructions
Suggested shape:
Data operation: <create / update / delete / export / seed>
Objects: <object + counts>
Target: <org alias or local path>
Artifacts: <record ids / csv / apex / json files>
Verification: <passed / partial / failed>
Cleanup: <exact delete or rollback guidance>
Cross-Skill Integration
| Need | Delegate to | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| discover object / field structure | sf-metadata | accurate schema grounding |
| run bulk-sensitive Apex validation | sf-testing | test execution and coverage |
| deploy missing schema first | sf-deploy | metadata readiness |
| implement production logic consuming the data | sf-apex or sf-flow | behavior implementation |
Reference Map
Start here
- references/sf-cli-data-commands.md
- references/test-data-best-practices.md
- references/orchestration.md
- references/test-data-patterns.md
- references/test-data-factory-usage.md
Query / bulk / cleanup
- references/soql-relationship-guide.md
- references/relationship-query-examples.md
- references/bulk-operations-guide.md
- references/cleanup-rollback-guide.md
- references/cleanup-rollback-example.md
Examples / limits
- references/crud-workflow-example.md
- references/bulk-testing-example.md
- references/anonymous-apex-guide.md
- references/governor-limits-reference.md
- assets/
Score Guide
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 117+ | strong production-safe data workflow |
| 104–116 | good operation with minor improvements possible |
| 91–103 | acceptable but review advised |
| 78–90 | partial / risky patterns present |
| < 78 | blocked until corrected |