Breach Notification Compliance Assessment
Assess breach notification compliance for "$ARGUMENTS". Map notification requirements by jurisdiction, evaluate contractual SLA obligations, and create a notification decision tree and template library.
Prerequisites
Read .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md. If this file does not exist, tell the user:
Phase 0 (Scope) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run /compliance:regulatory-landscape $ARGUMENTS first, or use --skip-checks to bypass.
If --skip-checks is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check.
Process
Read context files:
- Read
plugins/compliance/shared/grc-lifecycle-guide.md for GRC methodology reference
- Read
plugins/compliance/shared/assessment-template.md for output structure
- Read
.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md for scope and control framework context
GDPR breach notification (Art 33-34):
- Assess notification to supervisory authority procedures (72-hour timeline from awareness)
- Evaluate notification content requirements (nature of breach, categories/numbers affected, DPO contact, consequences, measures taken)
- Review notification to data subjects procedures (without undue delay if high risk to rights and freedoms)
- Assess breach severity assessment methodology (risk to individuals determination)
- Evaluate cross-border notification procedures (lead supervisory authority identification)
- Review breach record-keeping obligations (all breaches, not just notifiable ones)
US state breach notification laws:
- Map notification requirements across all applicable states
- Assess state-specific timelines (varies 30-90 days; some states have specific deadlines: Colorado 30 days, Florida 30 days, Washington 30 days)
- Evaluate Attorney General notification thresholds per state (e.g., 500+ individuals in many states)
- Review definition of "personal information" variations by state (some include login credentials, biometrics, health data)
- Assess consumer reporting agency notification requirements (typically 1,000+ individuals)
- Evaluate encryption and redaction safe harbors by state
- Review content requirements for notification letters per state
HIPAA breach notification (if applicable):
- Assess individual notification procedures (60 days from discovery, written notification)
- Evaluate HHS/OCR notification requirements (60 days for 500+ affected, annual log for under 500)
- Review media notification requirements (500+ individuals in a single state/jurisdiction)
- Assess breach risk assessment methodology (4-factor test: nature of PHI, unauthorized person, actual access/use, mitigation extent)
- Evaluate Business Associate notification obligations to Covered Entity (without unreasonable delay, no later than 60 days)
PCI DSS breach notification:
- Assess card brand notification procedures and timelines
- Evaluate acquiring bank notification requirements
- Review forensic investigation requirements (PFI engagement)
- Assess card reissuance cost liability and recovery procedures
- Evaluate PCI Forensic Investigator engagement readiness
NIS2 breach notification (if applicable):
- Assess early warning notification procedures (24 hours to CSIRT/competent authority)
- Evaluate incident notification requirements (72 hours with initial assessment)
- Review final report requirements (1 month with root cause analysis, mitigation measures, cross-border impact)
- Assess significant incident determination criteria
- Evaluate voluntary notification provisions for near-misses
Contractual SLA obligations:
- Map customer notification timelines from DPAs and BAAs
- Assess vendor/partner notification obligations (upstream and downstream)
- Evaluate contractual penalties for notification delays
- Review cooperation and information sharing obligations with customers
- Assess cyber insurance notification requirements and timelines
- Evaluate board and executive notification procedures (internal escalation)
Notification decision tree:
- Assess existence and accuracy of breach classification criteria (severity levels)
- Evaluate decision tree for determining notification obligations by breach type and jurisdiction
- Review escalation procedures from detection to notification decision
- Assess parallel notification workflow management (multiple jurisdictions simultaneously)
- Evaluate legal hold and privilege considerations in breach investigation
Template library and readiness:
- Assess existence of pre-drafted notification templates per jurisdiction
- Evaluate template content compliance with jurisdiction-specific requirements
- Review communication channel readiness (email, postal, website substitute notice, media)
- Assess call center and response team readiness for individual notifications
- Evaluate credit monitoring and identity protection service arrangements
- Review regulatory filing templates and portal access (state AG portals, HHS portal)
Write the artifact to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/breach-notification.md following the assessment template structure with:
- GDPR Notification — 72-hour process, content, and data subject notification readiness
- US State Laws — jurisdiction map, timelines, AG thresholds, and safe harbors
- HIPAA Notification — individual, HHS, and media notification procedures (if applicable)
- PCI DSS Notification — card brand and forensic investigation readiness (if applicable)
- NIS2 Notification — early warning, incident notification, and final report procedures (if applicable)
- Contractual SLAs — customer and vendor notification timeline compliance
- Decision Tree — breach classification, determination workflow, and escalation
- Template Library — pre-drafted templates and communication readiness
- Evidence Inventory — existing evidence and evidence gaps
- Remediation Priorities — ranked list of gaps to address
Output
The breach notification assessment written to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/breach-notification.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:
- Number of jurisdictions mapped and notification timeline compliance readiness
- Fastest required notification timeline and current capability to meet it
- Template and communication readiness score
- Top 3 gaps requiring remediation
1---2name: breach-notification3description: Assess breach notification compliance — requirements by jurisdiction, SLA obligations4---56# Breach Notification Compliance Assessment78Assess breach notification compliance for "$ARGUMENTS". Map notification requirements by jurisdiction, evaluate contractual SLA obligations, and create a notification decision tree and template library.910## Prerequisites1112Read `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md`. If this file does not exist, tell the user:1314> Phase 0 (Scope) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run `/compliance:regulatory-landscape $ARGUMENTS` first, or use `--skip-checks` to bypass.1516If `--skip-checks` is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check.1718## Process19201. **Read context files:**21 - Read `plugins/compliance/shared/grc-lifecycle-guide.md` for GRC methodology reference22 - Read `plugins/compliance/shared/assessment-template.md` for output structure23 - Read `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md` for scope and control framework context24252. **GDPR breach notification (Art 33-34):**26 - Assess notification to supervisory authority procedures (72-hour timeline from awareness)27 - Evaluate notification content requirements (nature of breach, categories/numbers affected, DPO contact, consequences, measures taken)28 - Review notification to data subjects procedures (without undue delay if high risk to rights and freedoms)29 - Assess breach severity assessment methodology (risk to individuals determination)30 - Evaluate cross-border notification procedures (lead supervisory authority identification)31 - Review breach record-keeping obligations (all breaches, not just notifiable ones)32333. **US state breach notification laws:**34 - Map notification requirements across all applicable states35 - Assess state-specific timelines (varies 30-90 days; some states have specific deadlines: Colorado 30 days, Florida 30 days, Washington 30 days)36 - Evaluate Attorney General notification thresholds per state (e.g., 500+ individuals in many states)37 - Review definition of "personal information" variations by state (some include login credentials, biometrics, health data)38 - Assess consumer reporting agency notification requirements (typically 1,000+ individuals)39 - Evaluate encryption and redaction safe harbors by state40 - Review content requirements for notification letters per state41424. **HIPAA breach notification (if applicable):**43 - Assess individual notification procedures (60 days from discovery, written notification)44 - Evaluate HHS/OCR notification requirements (60 days for 500+ affected, annual log for under 500)45 - Review media notification requirements (500+ individuals in a single state/jurisdiction)46 - Assess breach risk assessment methodology (4-factor test: nature of PHI, unauthorized person, actual access/use, mitigation extent)47 - Evaluate Business Associate notification obligations to Covered Entity (without unreasonable delay, no later than 60 days)48495. **PCI DSS breach notification:**50 - Assess card brand notification procedures and timelines51 - Evaluate acquiring bank notification requirements52 - Review forensic investigation requirements (PFI engagement)53 - Assess card reissuance cost liability and recovery procedures54 - Evaluate PCI Forensic Investigator engagement readiness55566. **NIS2 breach notification (if applicable):**57 - Assess early warning notification procedures (24 hours to CSIRT/competent authority)58 - Evaluate incident notification requirements (72 hours with initial assessment)59 - Review final report requirements (1 month with root cause analysis, mitigation measures, cross-border impact)60 - Assess significant incident determination criteria61 - Evaluate voluntary notification provisions for near-misses62637. **Contractual SLA obligations:**64 - Map customer notification timelines from DPAs and BAAs65 - Assess vendor/partner notification obligations (upstream and downstream)66 - Evaluate contractual penalties for notification delays67 - Review cooperation and information sharing obligations with customers68 - Assess cyber insurance notification requirements and timelines69 - Evaluate board and executive notification procedures (internal escalation)70718. **Notification decision tree:**72 - Assess existence and accuracy of breach classification criteria (severity levels)73 - Evaluate decision tree for determining notification obligations by breach type and jurisdiction74 - Review escalation procedures from detection to notification decision75 - Assess parallel notification workflow management (multiple jurisdictions simultaneously)76 - Evaluate legal hold and privilege considerations in breach investigation77789. **Template library and readiness:**79 - Assess existence of pre-drafted notification templates per jurisdiction80 - Evaluate template content compliance with jurisdiction-specific requirements81 - Review communication channel readiness (email, postal, website substitute notice, media)82 - Assess call center and response team readiness for individual notifications83 - Evaluate credit monitoring and identity protection service arrangements84 - Review regulatory filing templates and portal access (state AG portals, HHS portal)858610. **Write the artifact** to `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/breach-notification.md` following the assessment template structure with:87 - **GDPR Notification** — 72-hour process, content, and data subject notification readiness88 - **US State Laws** — jurisdiction map, timelines, AG thresholds, and safe harbors89 - **HIPAA Notification** — individual, HHS, and media notification procedures (if applicable)90 - **PCI DSS Notification** — card brand and forensic investigation readiness (if applicable)91 - **NIS2 Notification** — early warning, incident notification, and final report procedures (if applicable)92 - **Contractual SLAs** — customer and vendor notification timeline compliance93 - **Decision Tree** — breach classification, determination workflow, and escalation94 - **Template Library** — pre-drafted templates and communication readiness95 - **Evidence Inventory** — existing evidence and evidence gaps96 - **Remediation Priorities** — ranked list of gaps to address9798## Output99100The breach notification assessment written to `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/breach-notification.md`. Present a summary to the user highlighting:101- Number of jurisdictions mapped and notification timeline compliance readiness102- Fastest required notification timeline and current capability to meet it103- Template and communication readiness score104- Top 3 gaps requiring remediation