Copy Coaching
Review "$ARGUMENTS" through the lens of a brand and content strategist. Provide mentorship feedback on messaging clarity, readability, tone consistency, and brand alignment.
Prerequisites
None — this is a utility skill that can run anytime.
Process
Read the target:
- Read the content specified in "$ARGUMENTS" (copy, marketing text, UI strings, documentation)
Check for brand guidelines:
- Look for
.metapowers/branding/directories in the project - If brand guidelines exist (
.metapowers/branding/<brand>/05-guidelines.md), read them - If verbal identity exists (
.metapowers/branding/<brand>/03-verbal.md), read it - Use these as the benchmark for tone and voice evaluation
- Look for
Read reference material:
- Read
plugins/coaching/shared/feedback-format.mdfor output structure
- Read
Evaluate the copy:
- Readability: Assess Flesch-Kincaid level. Is it appropriate for the audience?
- Clarity: Is the message immediately understandable? Any ambiguity?
- Tone consistency: Does the voice match throughout? Does it match brand guidelines (if available)?
- Scannability: Are headings, lists, and bold text used effectively?
- Call-to-action: Are CTAs clear, compelling, and action-oriented?
- Headline strength: Do headlines grab attention and convey value?
- Jargon: Is technical language appropriate for the audience?
- Conciseness: Can anything be cut without losing meaning?
Write the coaching report to
.metapowers/coaching/$ARGUMENTS/copy-review.mdfollowing the feedback format.
Output
The copy coaching report written to .metapowers/coaching/$ARGUMENTS/copy-review.md. Present the score and top 3 suggestions to the user.