Cross-Regulation Map
Show how controls map across multiple regulations for "$ARGUMENTS" to identify high-coverage controls, regulation-unique requirements, and implementation priority based on coverage efficiency.
Prerequisites
None — this is a utility skill.
Process
Read context files:
- Read
plugins/compliance/shared/grc-lifecycle-guide.mdfor GRC methodology reference - Read
plugins/compliance/shared/control-mapping-template.mdfor mapping structure - Read any existing compliance artifacts in
.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/for context (if they exist)
- Read
Select regulations to map:
- Identify the regulations to include in the cross-regulation map
- If scope file exists, use the applicable regulations from Phase 0
- If no scope file, ask user which regulations to include or use common combinations (SOC 2 + ISO 27001 + GDPR)
Create cross-regulation matrix:
- For each control in the unified framework: list which regulation requirements it satisfies
- Map control to specific clause/criterion per regulation (e.g., SOC 2 CC6.1, ISO 27001 A.9.1.1, GDPR Art. 32)
- Show coverage visually — which controls satisfy the most regulations
Coverage analysis:
- Identify controls with highest cross-regulation coverage (implement once, satisfy many)
- Identify regulation-unique requirements — controls only required by one regulation
- Calculate coverage percentage — what percentage of each regulation's requirements are met by shared controls
- Identify the minimum set of controls needed to achieve baseline compliance across all regulations
Implementation priority:
- Rank controls by coverage efficiency — regulations satisfied per implementation effort
- Recommend implementation sequence starting with highest-coverage controls
- Identify foundation controls that enable compliance across all regulations
- Flag regulation-unique controls that must still be implemented for specific certifications
Write the artifact to
.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/cross-regulation-map.mdwith sections:- Cross-Regulation Matrix — controls vs. regulations mapping
- High-Coverage Controls — controls satisfying the most regulations
- Regulation-Unique Requirements — requirements specific to individual regulations
- Coverage Analysis — percentage of shared vs. unique requirements per regulation
- Implementation Priority — recommended sequence by coverage efficiency
- Minimum Viable Compliance — smallest control set for baseline compliance across all regulations
Output
The cross-regulation map written to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/cross-regulation-map.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:
- Number of controls mapped across regulations
- Top 5 highest-coverage controls
- Percentage of requirements shared vs. unique per regulation
- Recommended implementation starting point