Define
Converge the broad discovery findings on "$ARGUMENTS" into a focused problem statement, "How Might We" questions, and a research plan for the solution phase.
Prerequisites
Read .metapowers/research/$ARGUMENTS/01-discover.md. If this file does not exist, tell the user:
Phase 1 (Discover) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run
/research:discover $ARGUMENTSfirst, or use--skip-checksto bypass.
If --skip-checks is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check and log to .metapowers/research/$ARGUMENTS/skip-log.md.
Process
Read context files:
- Read
.metapowers/research/$ARGUMENTS/01-discover.mdfor discovery findings - Read
plugins/research/shared/double-diamond-guide.mdfor methodology reference - Read
plugins/research/shared/research-plan-template.mdfor output structure
- Read
Synthesize findings:
- Review all themes from the Discover phase
- Identify the core tension or unmet need
- Distinguish root causes from symptoms
- Map relationships between themes
Formulate the problem statement:
- Write a clear, specific, actionable problem statement
- Avoid solution-language (the problem, not the answer)
- Ensure it's scoped enough to be solvable
Generate "How Might We" questions:
- Create 3-5 HMW questions that reframe the problem as opportunities
- Each HMW should open a different solution direction
- Avoid HMW questions that are too broad or too narrow
Define success criteria and scope:
- What does "solved" look like? Specify measurable criteria
- What's in scope and out of scope for the Design phase?
- Identify constraints and assumptions
Write the artifact to
.metapowers/research/$ARGUMENTS/02-define.mdfollowing the research plan template structure.
Output
The problem definition written to .metapowers/research/$ARGUMENTS/02-define.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:
- The problem statement
- Top HMW questions
- Key scope decisions
- Recommended focus for the Design phase