EAA / EN 301 549 Assessment
Assess European Accessibility Act (EAA) and EN 301 549 compliance for "$ARGUMENTS". Determine product/service scope, evaluate against EN 301 549 requirements, and assess functional accessibility across all modalities.
Prerequisites
Read .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md. If this file does not exist, tell the user:
Phase 0 (Scope) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run /compliance:regulatory-landscape $ARGUMENTS first, or use --skip-checks to bypass.
If --skip-checks is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check.
Process
Read context files:
- Read
plugins/compliance/shared/grc-lifecycle-guide.md for GRC methodology reference
- Read
plugins/compliance/shared/assessment-template.md for output structure
- Read
.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md for scope and control framework context
EAA scope determination:
- Determine which products and services fall under EAA scope (effective June 2025)
- Assess applicability across covered sectors: e-commerce services, banking and financial services, transport services, e-books and e-readers, digital communications (telephony, messaging), access to audiovisual media services
- Evaluate micro-enterprise exemption eligibility (fewer than 10 employees and turnover/balance sheet under 2M EUR)
- Assess disproportionate burden defense availability where applicable
- Document in-scope products, services, and digital touchpoints
EN 301 549 web and mobile assessment (mapping to WCAG 2.1 AA):
- Assess web content against WCAG 2.1 Level AA success criteria:
- Perceivable: text alternatives, time-based media alternatives, adaptable content, distinguishable content (contrast, resize, audio control)
- Operable: keyboard accessible, enough time, seizures/physical reactions, navigable, input modalities
- Understandable: readable, predictable, input assistance
- Robust: compatible with assistive technologies, parsing, name/role/value
- Evaluate mobile application accessibility (native apps, hybrid apps)
- Assess responsive design and zoom/magnification support
- Review touch target sizes and gesture alternatives
EN 301 549 non-web requirements:
- Assess hardware accessibility requirements (if applicable): physical controls, operable parts, tactile discernibility
- Evaluate documentation and support service accessibility
- Review ICT with two-way voice communication requirements (real-time text, caller ID)
- Assess video communication accessibility (sign language, lip-reading support)
- Evaluate authoring tools and content management system accessibility
Functional accessibility requirements assessment:
- Usage without vision: Assess screen reader compatibility, audio descriptions, tactile alternatives
- Usage with limited vision: Evaluate magnification support, contrast options, text resizing, spacing adjustments
- Usage without perception of color: Assess color-independent information conveyance
- Usage without hearing: Evaluate captions, transcripts, visual alternatives for audio content
- Usage with limited manipulation: Assess alternative input methods, single-pointer operation, keyboard-only operation
- Usage with limited reach: Evaluate touch target accessibility, alternative interaction methods
- Minimized photosensitive seizure triggers: Assess flashing content limits (3 flashes per second threshold)
- Usage with limited cognition: Evaluate plain language, consistent navigation, error prevention, sufficient time
Conformance statement and documentation:
- Assess EU accessibility conformance statement requirements
- Evaluate conformance assessment methodology (self-assessment or third-party)
- Review accessibility statement content (conformance level, known issues, contact information, enforcement procedure)
- Assess feedback mechanism for accessibility issues
- Evaluate market surveillance and enforcement preparation
Testing and monitoring:
- Assess current accessibility testing practices (automated, manual, user testing with assistive technologies)
- Evaluate assistive technology testing coverage (screen readers, magnifiers, switch access, voice control)
- Review remediation tracking and regression testing procedures
- Assess ongoing monitoring and periodic reassessment plan
Write the artifact to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/eaa-en301549.md following the assessment template structure with:
- EAA Scope — in-scope products/services and exemption analysis
- WCAG 2.1 AA Assessment — compliance per principle (perceivable, operable, understandable, robust)
- Non-Web Requirements — hardware, documentation, and communication accessibility
- Functional Accessibility — assessment per functional requirement category
- Conformance Statement — documentation and declaration readiness
- Testing Practices — current testing coverage and methodology
- Evidence Inventory — existing evidence and evidence gaps
- Remediation Priorities — ranked list of gaps to address
Output
The EAA/EN 301 549 assessment written to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/eaa-en301549.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:
- Number of in-scope products/services and exemption applicability
- WCAG 2.1 AA compliance level per principle
- Functional accessibility coverage across all modalities
- Top 3 gaps requiring remediation
1---2name: eaa-en3015493description: Assess European Accessibility Act / EN 301 549 compliance4---56# EAA / EN 301 549 Assessment78Assess European Accessibility Act (EAA) and EN 301 549 compliance for "$ARGUMENTS". Determine product/service scope, evaluate against EN 301 549 requirements, and assess functional accessibility across all modalities.910## Prerequisites1112Read `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md`. If this file does not exist, tell the user:1314> Phase 0 (Scope) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run `/compliance:regulatory-landscape $ARGUMENTS` first, or use `--skip-checks` to bypass.1516If `--skip-checks` is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check.1718## Process19201. **Read context files:**21 - Read `plugins/compliance/shared/grc-lifecycle-guide.md` for GRC methodology reference22 - Read `plugins/compliance/shared/assessment-template.md` for output structure23 - Read `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md` for scope and control framework context24252. **EAA scope determination:**26 - Determine which products and services fall under EAA scope (effective June 2025)27 - Assess applicability across covered sectors: e-commerce services, banking and financial services, transport services, e-books and e-readers, digital communications (telephony, messaging), access to audiovisual media services28 - Evaluate micro-enterprise exemption eligibility (fewer than 10 employees and turnover/balance sheet under 2M EUR)29 - Assess disproportionate burden defense availability where applicable30 - Document in-scope products, services, and digital touchpoints31323. **EN 301 549 web and mobile assessment (mapping to WCAG 2.1 AA):**33 - Assess web content against WCAG 2.1 Level AA success criteria:34 - **Perceivable:** text alternatives, time-based media alternatives, adaptable content, distinguishable content (contrast, resize, audio control)35 - **Operable:** keyboard accessible, enough time, seizures/physical reactions, navigable, input modalities36 - **Understandable:** readable, predictable, input assistance37 - **Robust:** compatible with assistive technologies, parsing, name/role/value38 - Evaluate mobile application accessibility (native apps, hybrid apps)39 - Assess responsive design and zoom/magnification support40 - Review touch target sizes and gesture alternatives41424. **EN 301 549 non-web requirements:**43 - Assess hardware accessibility requirements (if applicable): physical controls, operable parts, tactile discernibility44 - Evaluate documentation and support service accessibility45 - Review ICT with two-way voice communication requirements (real-time text, caller ID)46 - Assess video communication accessibility (sign language, lip-reading support)47 - Evaluate authoring tools and content management system accessibility48495. **Functional accessibility requirements assessment:**50 - **Usage without vision:** Assess screen reader compatibility, audio descriptions, tactile alternatives51 - **Usage with limited vision:** Evaluate magnification support, contrast options, text resizing, spacing adjustments52 - **Usage without perception of color:** Assess color-independent information conveyance53 - **Usage without hearing:** Evaluate captions, transcripts, visual alternatives for audio content54 - **Usage with limited manipulation:** Assess alternative input methods, single-pointer operation, keyboard-only operation55 - **Usage with limited reach:** Evaluate touch target accessibility, alternative interaction methods56 - **Minimized photosensitive seizure triggers:** Assess flashing content limits (3 flashes per second threshold)57 - **Usage with limited cognition:** Evaluate plain language, consistent navigation, error prevention, sufficient time58596. **Conformance statement and documentation:**60 - Assess EU accessibility conformance statement requirements61 - Evaluate conformance assessment methodology (self-assessment or third-party)62 - Review accessibility statement content (conformance level, known issues, contact information, enforcement procedure)63 - Assess feedback mechanism for accessibility issues64 - Evaluate market surveillance and enforcement preparation65667. **Testing and monitoring:**67 - Assess current accessibility testing practices (automated, manual, user testing with assistive technologies)68 - Evaluate assistive technology testing coverage (screen readers, magnifiers, switch access, voice control)69 - Review remediation tracking and regression testing procedures70 - Assess ongoing monitoring and periodic reassessment plan71728. **Write the artifact** to `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/eaa-en301549.md` following the assessment template structure with:73 - **EAA Scope** — in-scope products/services and exemption analysis74 - **WCAG 2.1 AA Assessment** — compliance per principle (perceivable, operable, understandable, robust)75 - **Non-Web Requirements** — hardware, documentation, and communication accessibility76 - **Functional Accessibility** — assessment per functional requirement category77 - **Conformance Statement** — documentation and declaration readiness78 - **Testing Practices** — current testing coverage and methodology79 - **Evidence Inventory** — existing evidence and evidence gaps80 - **Remediation Priorities** — ranked list of gaps to address8182## Output8384The EAA/EN 301 549 assessment written to `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/eaa-en301549.md`. Present a summary to the user highlighting:85- Number of in-scope products/services and exemption applicability86- WCAG 2.1 AA compliance level per principle87- Functional accessibility coverage across all modalities88- Top 3 gaps requiring remediation