Implementation Plan
Create a phased implementation plan for "$ARGUMENTS" grouping controls into implementation waves with effort estimates, dependencies, owners, and target completion dates.
Prerequisites
Read .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md. If this file does not exist, tell the user:
Phase 0 (Scope) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run /compliance:regulatory-landscape $ARGUMENTS first, or use --skip-checks to bypass.
If --skip-checks is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check.
Process
Read context files:
- Read
plugins/compliance/shared/grc-lifecycle-guide.md for GRC methodology reference
- Read
.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md for scope and control framework context
- Read
.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/02-remediate.md for gap register, control mapping, evidence plan, and policy gaps
Group controls into implementation waves:
- Wave 1 — Critical & Quick Wins (Month 1-2): Critical gaps with regulatory urgency, quick wins (low effort, high impact), foundation controls enabling other controls
- Wave 2 — Core Controls (Month 3-4): Core security and compliance controls, policy development and approval, evidence collection infrastructure
- Wave 3 — Advanced & Optimization (Month 5-6): Advanced monitoring and automation, optimization of existing controls, continuous improvement processes
Per-control implementation detail:
- Implementation steps — concrete actions to deploy the control
- Effort estimate in person-days
- Dependencies — other controls, tools, approvals, or resources needed first
- Owner — team or individual responsible
- Target completion date
- Success criteria — how to verify the control is operating effectively
Resource planning:
- Internal resource needs — hours by team (engineering, security, legal, HR)
- External resource needs — consultants, auditors, tool vendors
- Tool/platform needs — GRC tool, SIEM, identity provider, training platform
- Budget estimate by wave
Timeline and checkpoints:
- Create Gantt-style timeline showing waves, controls, and dependencies
- Set progress review checkpoints (bi-weekly or monthly)
- Define go/no-go criteria for advancing to next wave
- Identify critical path items that could delay the overall plan
Write the artifact to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/02-remediate.md (append to existing) with sections:
- Implementation Waves — wave 1/2/3 groupings with rationale
- Control Implementation Details — per-control steps, effort, owner, target date
- Resource Plan — internal and external resource requirements
- Timeline — Gantt-style overview with milestones
- Checkpoints — review cadence and go/no-go criteria
- Risk Register — risks to the implementation plan with mitigations
Output
The implementation plan appended to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/02-remediate.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:
- Number of controls per wave
- Total estimated effort in person-days
- Critical path and key dependencies
- Recommended first actions to begin Wave 1
1---2name: implementation-plan3description: Create phased implementation plan for control deployment4---56# Implementation Plan78Create a phased implementation plan for "$ARGUMENTS" grouping controls into implementation waves with effort estimates, dependencies, owners, and target completion dates.910## Prerequisites1112Read `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md`. If this file does not exist, tell the user:1314> Phase 0 (Scope) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run `/compliance:regulatory-landscape $ARGUMENTS` first, or use `--skip-checks` to bypass.1516If `--skip-checks` is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check.1718## Process19201. **Read context files:**21 - Read `plugins/compliance/shared/grc-lifecycle-guide.md` for GRC methodology reference22 - Read `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md` for scope and control framework context23 - Read `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/02-remediate.md` for gap register, control mapping, evidence plan, and policy gaps24252. **Group controls into implementation waves:**26 - **Wave 1 — Critical & Quick Wins (Month 1-2):** Critical gaps with regulatory urgency, quick wins (low effort, high impact), foundation controls enabling other controls27 - **Wave 2 — Core Controls (Month 3-4):** Core security and compliance controls, policy development and approval, evidence collection infrastructure28 - **Wave 3 — Advanced & Optimization (Month 5-6):** Advanced monitoring and automation, optimization of existing controls, continuous improvement processes29303. **Per-control implementation detail:**31 - Implementation steps — concrete actions to deploy the control32 - Effort estimate in person-days33 - Dependencies — other controls, tools, approvals, or resources needed first34 - Owner — team or individual responsible35 - Target completion date36 - Success criteria — how to verify the control is operating effectively37384. **Resource planning:**39 - Internal resource needs — hours by team (engineering, security, legal, HR)40 - External resource needs — consultants, auditors, tool vendors41 - Tool/platform needs — GRC tool, SIEM, identity provider, training platform42 - Budget estimate by wave43445. **Timeline and checkpoints:**45 - Create Gantt-style timeline showing waves, controls, and dependencies46 - Set progress review checkpoints (bi-weekly or monthly)47 - Define go/no-go criteria for advancing to next wave48 - Identify critical path items that could delay the overall plan49506. **Write the artifact** to `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/02-remediate.md` (append to existing) with sections:51 - **Implementation Waves** — wave 1/2/3 groupings with rationale52 - **Control Implementation Details** — per-control steps, effort, owner, target date53 - **Resource Plan** — internal and external resource requirements54 - **Timeline** — Gantt-style overview with milestones55 - **Checkpoints** — review cadence and go/no-go criteria56 - **Risk Register** — risks to the implementation plan with mitigations5758## Output5960The implementation plan appended to `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/02-remediate.md`. Present a summary to the user highlighting:61- Number of controls per wave62- Total estimated effort in person-days63- Critical path and key dependencies64- Recommended first actions to begin Wave 1