ISO/IEC 42001 Assessment
Assess ISO/IEC 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) readiness for "$ARGUMENTS". Evaluate AI-specific management system requirements, map to existing ISO 27001 ISMS, and identify AI-specific controls beyond standard information security.
Prerequisites
Read .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md. If this file does not exist, tell the user:
Phase 0 (Scope) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run /compliance:regulatory-landscape $ARGUMENTS first, or use --skip-checks to bypass.
If --skip-checks is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check.
Process
Read context files:
- Read
plugins/compliance/shared/grc-lifecycle-guide.md for GRC methodology reference
- Read
plugins/compliance/shared/assessment-template.md for output structure
- Read
.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md for scope and control framework context
AI policy and leadership (Clauses 5):
- Assess existence and adequacy of AI policy aligned with organizational strategy
- Evaluate leadership commitment to responsible AI development and deployment
- Review roles, responsibilities, and authorities for AI governance
- Assess organizational AI objectives and planning to achieve them
Context and scope (Clauses 4):
- Assess understanding of organizational context relevant to AI (internal/external issues)
- Evaluate identification of interested parties and their requirements for AI
- Review AIMS scope definition (AI systems, processes, and organizational units)
- Assess alignment with organizational values and ethical AI principles
AI risk assessment (Clause 6):
- Assess AI risk assessment methodology (identification, analysis, evaluation)
- Evaluate coverage of AI-specific risks (bias, fairness, transparency, safety, privacy)
- Review risk treatment plans and residual risk acceptance
- Assess integration with enterprise risk management framework
AI impact assessment:
- Assess AI impact assessment process for individuals, groups, and society
- Evaluate consideration of ethical, social, and environmental impacts
- Review stakeholder impact documentation and mitigation measures
- Assess ongoing impact monitoring for deployed AI systems
Data management for AI (Annex B controls):
- Assess data quality management for AI training, validation, and testing data
- Evaluate data provenance and lineage tracking
- Review data bias assessment and mitigation procedures
- Assess data lifecycle management for AI-specific datasets
- Evaluate data governance policies specific to AI workloads
AI system lifecycle management:
- Assess AI system development lifecycle procedures (design, development, testing, deployment, monitoring, retirement)
- Evaluate model validation and verification processes
- Review AI system performance monitoring and drift detection
- Assess change management for AI models and systems
- Evaluate AI system documentation throughout the lifecycle
Third-party AI considerations:
- Assess governance of third-party AI components, models, and services
- Evaluate vendor AI risk assessment procedures
- Review contractual requirements for third-party AI providers
- Assess transparency and explainability requirements for third-party AI
ISO 27001 integration assessment:
- Map shared clauses (4-10) between ISO 42001 and existing ISO 27001 ISMS
- Identify reusable controls and documentation from existing ISMS
- Assess gaps between current ISMS and AI-specific requirements
- Evaluate integrated management system approach feasibility
- Document AI-specific controls beyond standard information security (Annex A/B)
Performance evaluation and improvement (Clauses 9-10):
- Assess monitoring, measurement, analysis, and evaluation of AIMS
- Evaluate internal audit program for AI management
- Review management review process for AI governance
- Assess continual improvement mechanisms for AI management
Write the artifact to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/iso42001.md following the assessment template structure with:
- AI Policy and Governance — leadership commitment and organizational framework
- AI Risk Assessment — methodology, coverage, and treatment plans
- AI Impact Assessment — process maturity and stakeholder coverage
- Data Management — AI-specific data governance and quality
- Lifecycle Management — development, deployment, and monitoring procedures
- Third-Party AI — governance of external AI components
- ISO 27001 Integration — shared controls and AI-specific gaps
- Performance Evaluation — audit and improvement mechanisms
- Evidence Inventory — existing evidence and evidence gaps
- Remediation Priorities — ranked list of gaps to address
Output
The ISO 42001 assessment written to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/iso42001.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:
- Overall AIMS readiness maturity level
- ISO 27001 reuse potential (percentage of shared clauses already covered)
- AI-specific control gaps beyond existing ISMS
- Top 3 gaps requiring remediation
1---2name: iso420013description: Assess ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system readiness4---56# ISO/IEC 42001 Assessment78Assess ISO/IEC 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) readiness for "$ARGUMENTS". Evaluate AI-specific management system requirements, map to existing ISO 27001 ISMS, and identify AI-specific controls beyond standard information security.910## Prerequisites1112Read `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md`. If this file does not exist, tell the user:1314> Phase 0 (Scope) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run `/compliance:regulatory-landscape $ARGUMENTS` first, or use `--skip-checks` to bypass.1516If `--skip-checks` is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check.1718## Process19201. **Read context files:**21 - Read `plugins/compliance/shared/grc-lifecycle-guide.md` for GRC methodology reference22 - Read `plugins/compliance/shared/assessment-template.md` for output structure23 - Read `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md` for scope and control framework context24252. **AI policy and leadership (Clauses 5):**26 - Assess existence and adequacy of AI policy aligned with organizational strategy27 - Evaluate leadership commitment to responsible AI development and deployment28 - Review roles, responsibilities, and authorities for AI governance29 - Assess organizational AI objectives and planning to achieve them30313. **Context and scope (Clauses 4):**32 - Assess understanding of organizational context relevant to AI (internal/external issues)33 - Evaluate identification of interested parties and their requirements for AI34 - Review AIMS scope definition (AI systems, processes, and organizational units)35 - Assess alignment with organizational values and ethical AI principles36374. **AI risk assessment (Clause 6):**38 - Assess AI risk assessment methodology (identification, analysis, evaluation)39 - Evaluate coverage of AI-specific risks (bias, fairness, transparency, safety, privacy)40 - Review risk treatment plans and residual risk acceptance41 - Assess integration with enterprise risk management framework42435. **AI impact assessment:**44 - Assess AI impact assessment process for individuals, groups, and society45 - Evaluate consideration of ethical, social, and environmental impacts46 - Review stakeholder impact documentation and mitigation measures47 - Assess ongoing impact monitoring for deployed AI systems48496. **Data management for AI (Annex B controls):**50 - Assess data quality management for AI training, validation, and testing data51 - Evaluate data provenance and lineage tracking52 - Review data bias assessment and mitigation procedures53 - Assess data lifecycle management for AI-specific datasets54 - Evaluate data governance policies specific to AI workloads55567. **AI system lifecycle management:**57 - Assess AI system development lifecycle procedures (design, development, testing, deployment, monitoring, retirement)58 - Evaluate model validation and verification processes59 - Review AI system performance monitoring and drift detection60 - Assess change management for AI models and systems61 - Evaluate AI system documentation throughout the lifecycle62638. **Third-party AI considerations:**64 - Assess governance of third-party AI components, models, and services65 - Evaluate vendor AI risk assessment procedures66 - Review contractual requirements for third-party AI providers67 - Assess transparency and explainability requirements for third-party AI68699. **ISO 27001 integration assessment:**70 - Map shared clauses (4-10) between ISO 42001 and existing ISO 27001 ISMS71 - Identify reusable controls and documentation from existing ISMS72 - Assess gaps between current ISMS and AI-specific requirements73 - Evaluate integrated management system approach feasibility74 - Document AI-specific controls beyond standard information security (Annex A/B)757610. **Performance evaluation and improvement (Clauses 9-10):**77 - Assess monitoring, measurement, analysis, and evaluation of AIMS78 - Evaluate internal audit program for AI management79 - Review management review process for AI governance80 - Assess continual improvement mechanisms for AI management818211. **Write the artifact** to `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/iso42001.md` following the assessment template structure with:83 - **AI Policy and Governance** — leadership commitment and organizational framework84 - **AI Risk Assessment** — methodology, coverage, and treatment plans85 - **AI Impact Assessment** — process maturity and stakeholder coverage86 - **Data Management** — AI-specific data governance and quality87 - **Lifecycle Management** — development, deployment, and monitoring procedures88 - **Third-Party AI** — governance of external AI components89 - **ISO 27001 Integration** — shared controls and AI-specific gaps90 - **Performance Evaluation** — audit and improvement mechanisms91 - **Evidence Inventory** — existing evidence and evidence gaps92 - **Remediation Priorities** — ranked list of gaps to address9394## Output9596The ISO 42001 assessment written to `.metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/01-assess/iso42001.md`. Present a summary to the user highlighting:97- Overall AIMS readiness maturity level98- ISO 27001 reuse potential (percentage of shared clauses already covered)99- AI-specific control gaps beyond existing ISMS100- Top 3 gaps requiring remediation