Stakeholder Update
Generate a stakeholder status update for "$ARGUMENTS". Summarize sprint progress, set RAG status, list risks and mitigations, note decisions needed, and include upcoming milestones.
Prerequisites
Check that .project/$ARGUMENTS/00-initiate.md exists. If it does not, tell the user to run an Initiate skill first (e.g., project-charter) and stop.
If the user passes --skip-checks, skip the prerequisite check and log the skip to .project/$ARGUMENTS/skip-log.md with a timestamp and reason.
Process
Read existing context:
- Read
.project/$ARGUMENTS/00-initiate.md for stakeholder map, project charter, and team context
- Read
.project/$ARGUMENTS/03-review.md if it exists (for sprint review results and metrics)
- Read
.project/$ARGUMENTS/02-sprint.md if it exists (for sprint state, blockers, and standup history)
- Read
.project/$ARGUMENTS/01-plan.md if it exists (for roadmap, backlog, and milestone plan)
Read stakeholder map:
- Identify key stakeholders from the initiate phase
- Determine the appropriate level of detail for each audience (executive summary vs. detailed report)
- Note each stakeholder's primary concerns and interests
- Tailor the update tone: executives want conciseness, technical leads want specifics
Summarize sprint progress:
- Report percentage of stories complete (completed / committed)
- List key deliverables completed this sprint (feature names, not story IDs)
- Note any significant achievements or milestones reached
- If a sprint review exists, reference the commitment ratio
- Keep the summary to 3-5 bullet points maximum
Set overall RAG status:
- Green: on track, no significant risks, sprint goal achieved or on pace
- Amber: minor risks or delays, sprint goal at risk but recoverable, action needed
- Red: significant risks or blockers, sprint goal missed or unrecoverable, escalation needed
- Provide a one-line justification for the RAG status
- Compare to the previous update's RAG status (improving, stable, or declining)
List key risks and mitigations (top 3):
- For each risk, describe: what the risk is, its likelihood (high/medium/low), its impact (high/medium/low)
- For each risk, describe the mitigation plan or contingency action
- Note any risks that have been resolved since the last update
- Prioritize risks by impact — stakeholders care most about what could derail the project
- If there are more than 3 risks, list the top 3 and note that additional risks are tracked separately
Note decisions needed from stakeholders:
- List any decisions that are pending and blocking progress
- For each decision, explain: what the decision is, who needs to make it, the deadline, and the impact of delay
- Provide a recommendation for each decision (do not just present options without a suggested path)
- Mark decisions by urgency: this week, this sprint, next sprint
List upcoming milestones and timeline confidence:
- List the next 2-3 milestones with target dates
- For each milestone, rate timeline confidence: high (>90%), medium (60-90%), low (<60%)
- Note any milestones that have shifted since the last update and explain why
- If there are dependencies on external teams or approvals, flag them here
Include team capacity and morale note:
- Briefly note team capacity: full strength, reduced (and why), or ramping up
- Note any morale concerns: burnout risk, sustained overtime, team changes, celebrations
- Keep this section brief (2-3 sentences) — it provides human context to the numbers
- If there are asks related to team needs (hiring, tools, training), include them here
Write the artifact — append to .project/$ARGUMENTS/03-review.md under a ## Stakeholder Update section:
- RAG Status — Green/Amber/Red with one-line justification
- Sprint Progress — key deliverables and completion percentage
- Top Risks — top 3 risks with likelihood, impact, and mitigation
- Decisions Needed — pending decisions with owners and deadlines
- Upcoming Milestones — next milestones with dates and confidence levels
- Team & Capacity — capacity status and morale note
Output
Stakeholder update appended to .project/$ARGUMENTS/03-review.md. Present a summary highlighting:
- RAG status with justification
- Sprint progress percentage and key deliverables
- Top risk and its mitigation
- Most urgent decision needed
- Next milestone and timeline confidence
1---2name: stakeholder-update3description: Generate stakeholder status update with progress, risks, and asks4---56# Stakeholder Update78Generate a stakeholder status update for "$ARGUMENTS". Summarize sprint progress, set RAG status, list risks and mitigations, note decisions needed, and include upcoming milestones.910## Prerequisites1112Check that `.project/$ARGUMENTS/00-initiate.md` exists. If it does not, tell the user to run an Initiate skill first (e.g., project-charter) and stop.1314If the user passes `--skip-checks`, skip the prerequisite check and log the skip to `.project/$ARGUMENTS/skip-log.md` with a timestamp and reason.1516## Process17181. **Read existing context:**19 - Read `.project/$ARGUMENTS/00-initiate.md` for stakeholder map, project charter, and team context20 - Read `.project/$ARGUMENTS/03-review.md` if it exists (for sprint review results and metrics)21 - Read `.project/$ARGUMENTS/02-sprint.md` if it exists (for sprint state, blockers, and standup history)22 - Read `.project/$ARGUMENTS/01-plan.md` if it exists (for roadmap, backlog, and milestone plan)23242. **Read stakeholder map:**25 - Identify key stakeholders from the initiate phase26 - Determine the appropriate level of detail for each audience (executive summary vs. detailed report)27 - Note each stakeholder's primary concerns and interests28 - Tailor the update tone: executives want conciseness, technical leads want specifics29303. **Summarize sprint progress:**31 - Report percentage of stories complete (completed / committed)32 - List key deliverables completed this sprint (feature names, not story IDs)33 - Note any significant achievements or milestones reached34 - If a sprint review exists, reference the commitment ratio35 - Keep the summary to 3-5 bullet points maximum36374. **Set overall RAG status:**38 - **Green:** on track, no significant risks, sprint goal achieved or on pace39 - **Amber:** minor risks or delays, sprint goal at risk but recoverable, action needed40 - **Red:** significant risks or blockers, sprint goal missed or unrecoverable, escalation needed41 - Provide a one-line justification for the RAG status42 - Compare to the previous update's RAG status (improving, stable, or declining)43445. **List key risks and mitigations (top 3):**45 - For each risk, describe: what the risk is, its likelihood (high/medium/low), its impact (high/medium/low)46 - For each risk, describe the mitigation plan or contingency action47 - Note any risks that have been resolved since the last update48 - Prioritize risks by impact — stakeholders care most about what could derail the project49 - If there are more than 3 risks, list the top 3 and note that additional risks are tracked separately50516. **Note decisions needed from stakeholders:**52 - List any decisions that are pending and blocking progress53 - For each decision, explain: what the decision is, who needs to make it, the deadline, and the impact of delay54 - Provide a recommendation for each decision (do not just present options without a suggested path)55 - Mark decisions by urgency: this week, this sprint, next sprint56577. **List upcoming milestones and timeline confidence:**58 - List the next 2-3 milestones with target dates59 - For each milestone, rate timeline confidence: high (>90%), medium (60-90%), low (<60%)60 - Note any milestones that have shifted since the last update and explain why61 - If there are dependencies on external teams or approvals, flag them here62638. **Include team capacity and morale note:**64 - Briefly note team capacity: full strength, reduced (and why), or ramping up65 - Note any morale concerns: burnout risk, sustained overtime, team changes, celebrations66 - Keep this section brief (2-3 sentences) — it provides human context to the numbers67 - If there are asks related to team needs (hiring, tools, training), include them here68699. **Write the artifact** — append to `.project/$ARGUMENTS/03-review.md` under a `## Stakeholder Update` section:70 - **RAG Status** — Green/Amber/Red with one-line justification71 - **Sprint Progress** — key deliverables and completion percentage72 - **Top Risks** — top 3 risks with likelihood, impact, and mitigation73 - **Decisions Needed** — pending decisions with owners and deadlines74 - **Upcoming Milestones** — next milestones with dates and confidence levels75 - **Team & Capacity** — capacity status and morale note7677## Output7879Stakeholder update appended to `.project/$ARGUMENTS/03-review.md`. Present a summary highlighting:80- RAG status with justification81- Sprint progress percentage and key deliverables82- Top risk and its mitigation83- Most urgent decision needed84- Next milestone and timeline confidence