Threat Model

Threat Model

Model threats for "$ARGUMENTS" using structured threat modeling methodologies. Identify what can go wrong, assess each threat's severity, and propose mitigations.

Prerequisites

Read .metapowers/security/$ARGUMENTS/00-govern.md. If this file does not exist, tell the user:

Phase 0 (Govern) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run a Govern skill first (e.g., /security:security-policy $ARGUMENTS), or use --skip-checks to bypass.

If --skip-checks is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check and log to .metapowers/security/$ARGUMENTS/skip-log.md.

Process

1. Read context files:

   • Read plugins/security/shared/threat-model-template.md for methodology reference and output structure
   • Read .metapowers/security/$ARGUMENTS/00-govern.md for organizational context and risk appetite

2. Describe the system being modeled:

   • Define the system or component scope (application, service, infrastructure, data flow)
   • Identify key actors: end users, administrators, external services, automated processes
   • List technologies and protocols in use
   • Document assumptions about the environment (network segmentation, authentication mechanisms, hosting model)

3. Draw data flow diagram (text-based):

   • Identify processes, data stores, external entities, and data flows
   • Use text-based notation to represent the diagram (e.g., [User] --> (Web App) --> [Database])
   • Mark trust boundaries between different security zones (public internet, DMZ, internal network, database tier)
   • Label each flow with the data type and protocol

4. Apply STRIDE to each component:

   • For each element in the data flow, systematically evaluate:
     • Spoofing — can an attacker impersonate a legitimate user or system?
     • Tampering — can data be modified in transit or at rest without detection?
     • Repudiation — can an actor deny performing an action without proof?
     • Information Disclosure — can sensitive data be exposed to unauthorized parties?
     • Denial of Service — can the component be rendered unavailable?
     • Elevation of Privilege — can an attacker gain higher access than authorized?
   • Document each identified threat with ID, description, affected component, and STRIDE category

5. Rate each threat by likelihood and impact:

   • Likelihood (1-5): based on attack complexity, required access, and known exploitation
   • Impact (1-5): based on data sensitivity, business criticality, and blast radius
   • Risk score = likelihood x impact
   • Categorize: Critical (20-25), High (12-19), Medium (6-11), Low (1-5)
   • Prioritize threats by risk score for mitigation planning

6. Write the artifact to .metapowers/security/$ARGUMENTS/01-identify.md with heading:

   Threat Model

   Include sections:

   • System Description — scope, actors, technologies, and assumptions
   • Data Flow Diagram — text-based diagram with trust boundaries
   • Threat Catalog — all identified threats with STRIDE classification and risk score
   • Threat Prioritization — ranked list by risk score
   • Proposed Mitigations — recommended controls for each high and critical threat

Output

The threat model written to .metapowers/security/$ARGUMENTS/01-identify.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:

• System scope and trust boundaries identified
• Total threats found by STRIDE category
• Top critical and high-risk threats
• Recommended mitigations for the highest-priority threats