UX Coaching
Review "$ARGUMENTS" through the lens of a senior UX/UI designer. Provide mentorship feedback on usability, visual hierarchy, readability, and adherence to UX principles.
Prerequisites
None — this is a utility skill that can run anytime.
Process
Read the target:
- Read the file, component, or design artifact specified in "$ARGUMENTS"
- If it's a design artifact (from
.metapowers/design/), read the full context - If it's code, focus on the UI/UX aspects (layout, interaction, feedback)
Read reference material:
- Read
plugins/coaching/shared/ux-laws.mdfor UX principles - Read
plugins/coaching/shared/feedback-format.mdfor output structure
- Read
Evaluate against UX principles:
- Fitts's Law: Are important targets appropriately sized and positioned?
- Hick's Law: Are choices minimized? Is progressive disclosure used?
- Jakob's Law: Does it follow established conventions?
- Miller's Law: Is information chunked appropriately?
- Gestalt principles: Are grouping, proximity, and similarity used effectively?
- Visual hierarchy: Is importance conveyed through size, color, position, whitespace?
- Readability/legibility: Line length, contrast, typography, scannability
- Cognitive load: Is extraneous complexity minimized?
- Information architecture: Is navigation logical and labeling clear?
Write the coaching report to
.metapowers/coaching/$ARGUMENTS/ux-review.mdfollowing the feedback format.
Output
The UX coaching report written to .metapowers/coaching/$ARGUMENTS/ux-review.md. Present the score and top 3 suggestions to the user.