How do I install the Ahr Writing Style skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add brycewang-stanford/ahr-writing-style in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Ahr Writing Style safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Capability flags: docs only. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Ahr Writing Style?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Ahr Writing Style free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Ahr Writing Style?

brycewang-stanford (@brycewang-stanford) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Ahr Writing Style by brycewang-stanford

Name: Ahr Writing Style
Rating: 4.2 (5 reviews)
Author: brycewang-stanford

Ahr Writing Style

Use when drafting or polishing the prose of an American Historical Review (AHR) manuscript so it reads with clarity and authority for historians across all fields. The AHR rewards lucid, narrative-aware scholarly prose, not jargon. Tightens voice and readability; it does not invent content or argument.

brycewang-stanford Updated Sep 8, 2026 1k repo stars

File contents

Writing Style (ahr-writing-style)

The AHR is read by historians of every period and place. Its best articles are written in clear, authoritative, narrative-aware prose that a specialist in another field can follow with pleasure. This skill is about voice and readability — not about generating claims (that is ahr-argument-development) or formatting notes (that is ahr-citation-and-style).

When to trigger

Drafting the introduction or polishing a full draft
The prose is dense with jargon or buries the argument
Quotations and evidence are dropped in without framing
Aligning tense, voice, and terminology before submission

Writing for the whole discipline

Lead with the idea. Each paragraph should advance the argument; the reader should never have to reconstruct your point from a thicket of detail.
Minimize jargon; define terms of art. A historian of another field should follow your argument. Translate insider vocabulary or explain it on first use.
Frame your evidence. Introduce a quotation, say what to notice, then interpret it — never let a block quote do the arguing for you.
Control tense and voice. Narrate the past in the past tense; keep an authoritative but not inflated voice; prefer active, concrete sentences.
Tell the story while you argue. History rewards narrative momentum; carry the reader through time while the analysis accrues (see ahr-structure-and-exposition).
Quote with care. Reproduce sources accurately; use ellipses and brackets honestly; translate where wording matters and note the translation.

Mechanics the AHR expects

Manuscript format: Word document, 8½ × 11, Times New Roman 12 pt, double-spaced, numbered pages — and masked (no identifying details) for anonymous review.
Style authority: Chicago Manual of Style for prose and notes (see ahr-citation-and-style).
Length: ideally ≤ 8,000 words of text (notes/tables/charts excluded; verify current figure).

Anti-patterns

An introduction heavy with background that never states the argument
Theory-speak or subfield jargon that locks out other historians
Block quotations left to "speak for themselves"
Present-tense narration of past events; passive, abstract sentences
Inflated, self-important voice that distracts from the evidence

Output format

【Argument visible early?】[Y/N]
【Reads past the subfield?】jargon defined / terms explained? [Y/N]
【Evidence framed?】quotations introduced + interpreted? [Y/N]
【Tense + voice】past tense, active, controlled? [Y/N]
【Format】Word / TNR 12 / double-spaced / masked? [Y/N]
【Next】ahr-citation-and-style

Supplementary resources

../../resources/external_tools.md — drafting tools and the Chicago Manual of Style
../../resources/official-source-map.md — AHR formatting and length requirements

---name: ahr-writing-styledescription: Use when drafting or polishing the prose of an American Historical Review (AHR) manuscript so it reads with clarity and authority for historians across all fields. The AHR rewards lucid, narrative-aware scholarly prose, not jargon. Tightens voice and readability; it does not invent content or argument.---# Writing Style (ahr-writing-style)The AHR is read by historians of every period and place. Its best articles are written in **clear,authoritative, narrative-aware prose** that a specialist in another field can follow with pleasure.This skill is about voice and readability — not about generating claims (that is`ahr-argument-development`) or formatting notes (that is `ahr-citation-and-style`).## When to trigger- Drafting the introduction or polishing a full draft- The prose is dense with jargon or buries the argument- Quotations and evidence are dropped in without framing- Aligning tense, voice, and terminology before submission## Writing for the whole discipline1. **Lead with the idea.** Each paragraph should advance the argument; the reader should never have to reconstruct your point from a thicket of detail.2. **Minimize jargon; define terms of art.** A historian of another field should follow your argument. Translate insider vocabulary or explain it on first use.3. **Frame your evidence.** Introduce a quotation, say what to notice, then interpret it — never let a block quote do the arguing for you.4. **Control tense and voice.** Narrate the past in the past tense; keep an authoritative but not inflated voice; prefer active, concrete sentences.5. **Tell the story while you argue.** History rewards narrative momentum; carry the reader through time while the analysis accrues (see `ahr-structure-and-exposition`).6. **Quote with care.** Reproduce sources accurately; use ellipses and brackets honestly; translate where wording matters and note the translation.## Mechanics the AHR expects- **Manuscript format:** Word document, **8½ × 11, Times New Roman 12 pt, double-spaced, numbered pages** — and **masked** (no identifying details) for anonymous review.- **Style authority:** *Chicago Manual of Style* for prose and notes (see `ahr-citation-and-style`).- **Length:** ideally **≤ 8,000 words** of text (notes/tables/charts excluded; verify current figure).## Anti-patterns- An introduction heavy with background that never states the argument- Theory-speak or subfield jargon that locks out other historians- Block quotations left to "speak for themselves"- Present-tense narration of past events; passive, abstract sentences- Inflated, self-important voice that distracts from the evidence## Output format```【Argument visible early?】[Y/N]【Reads past the subfield?】jargon defined / terms explained? [Y/N]【Evidence framed?】quotations introduced + interpreted? [Y/N]【Tense + voice】past tense, active, controlled? [Y/N]【Format】Word / TNR 12 / double-spaced / masked? [Y/N]【Next】ahr-citation-and-style```## Supplementary resources- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — drafting tools and the Chicago Manual of Style- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — AHR formatting and length requirements

Frequently asked questions