EctJ Submission
Use this immediately before submission through Editorial Express.
Preflight
- Confirm the manuscript uses the required RES/EctJ LaTeX template and the correct online
appendix template if applicable.
- Check the current page norm. RES guidance says the paper should not normally exceed 20
pages including the printed appendix.
- Keep the summary within the current limit; RES guidance says no more than 150 words.
- Include an empirical application, even for theory papers.
- Keep mathematical proofs in the main text or printed appendix when current RES guidance
requires that; do not rely on the online appendix for proofs.
- Prepare a cover letter only for conflicts, exemptions, or prior reports when current
guidance says that is the intended use.
- Budget the current submission fee. The source map records a flat fee of GBP 75 plus VAT
under the 2026 RES policy, with no RES-member discount.
- Disclose replication restrictions or exemption needs at first submission.
Final hour order
Run the preflight in this order:
- Venue facts: reopen
resources/official-source-map.md and verify portal, fee, page, summary, proof,
and replication requirements against live pages.
- Conformance: compile the template PDF, count printed pages, count summary words, and verify proof
placement.
- Scientific gate: read the first two pages only. They must state the leading case, applied value, and
closest incumbent method without relying on later sections.
- Package gate: confirm the replication README and master command exist even if the final package is
delivered after conditional acceptance.
- Administrative gate: fee path, cover-letter reason, data restrictions, and author metadata.
Worked preflight: a specification-test vignette
Illustrative run of the final-hour order on a hypothetical kernel specification-test paper:
- Venue facts reopened: fee, page norm, summary limit, and proof placement reverified on live
RES pages; one wording change found and noted in the source map.
- Conformance: template compile gives 22 printed pages against the 20-page norm. The fix is
moving the secondary power grid to the online appendix and merging two bandwidth tables, not
shrinking margins; margin tricks are exactly what conformance screens catch.
- Summary count: 164 words. Cut the sentence restating the literature; the summary needs only the
econometric object, the leading-case result, and the applied payoff.
- Scientific gate: the first two pages name the incumbent test, its size distortion under
heteroskedasticity (illustrative: 11% rejection at nominal 5%), and the application.
- Package gate: the master script reruns the smoke simulation in about nine minutes; the README
states that runtime.
Result after fixes: 19.5 pages, a 148-word summary, proofs in the printed appendix — submit.
Editorial Express slip list
- Metadata fields (JEL codes, keywords) inconsistent with the PDF front page.
- PDF compiled outside the RES/EctJ template, or the online appendix mixed into the main file
instead of the separate appendix template.
- Fee handled on an outdated amount; reconfirm the current figure and VAT treatment against the
journal's current author guidelines on submission day.
- Cover letter used for marketing; at this venue it exists for conflicts, exemption requests, and
prior reports only.
- Replication exemption needs known to the authors but not disclosed at first submission, which
the RES policy expects.
Fee and disclosure notes
- The recorded RES policy is a flat fee per new submission with no RES-member discount, and it is
non-refundable even on desk rejection except for genuine payment errors — budget it as a sunk
screening cost.
- Whether a resubmission after reject-and-resubmit incurs a fresh fee depends on current policy
wording; confirm on the live fee-policy page before assuming either answer.
- Disclosing restricted data at first submission is an RES expectation, because the editorial
board decides whether the paper can be considered at all under the replication policy.
Output format
[Submission readiness] Ready / Needs fixes / Not ready
[Format checks] <template/page/summary/proofs/appendix>
[Content checks] <leading case/empirical application/simulations>
[Administrative checks] <Editorial Express/fee/cover letter/replication disclosure>
[Blocking fix] <one issue to resolve first>
1---2name: ectj-submission3description: Use when running the final The Econometrics Journal pre-submission check for Editorial Express, RES/OUP template compliance, 20-page printed-paper norm, 150-word summary, empirical application, proofs placement, submission fee, cover letter, and replication-policy disclosure.4---56# EctJ Submission78Use this immediately before submission through Editorial Express.910## Preflight1112- Confirm the manuscript uses the required RES/EctJ LaTeX template and the correct online13 appendix template if applicable.14- Check the current page norm. RES guidance says the paper should not normally exceed 2015 pages including the printed appendix.16- Keep the summary within the current limit; RES guidance says no more than 150 words.17- Include an empirical application, even for theory papers.18- Keep mathematical proofs in the main text or printed appendix when current RES guidance19 requires that; do not rely on the online appendix for proofs.20- Prepare a cover letter only for conflicts, exemptions, or prior reports when current21 guidance says that is the intended use.22- Budget the current submission fee. The source map records a flat fee of GBP 75 plus VAT23 under the 2026 RES policy, with no RES-member discount.24- Disclose replication restrictions or exemption needs at first submission.2526## Final hour order2728Run the preflight in this order:29301. **Venue facts**: reopen `resources/official-source-map.md` and verify portal, fee, page, summary, proof,31 and replication requirements against live pages.322. **Conformance**: compile the template PDF, count printed pages, count summary words, and verify proof33 placement.343. **Scientific gate**: read the first two pages only. They must state the leading case, applied value, and35 closest incumbent method without relying on later sections.364. **Package gate**: confirm the replication README and master command exist even if the final package is37 delivered after conditional acceptance.385. **Administrative gate**: fee path, cover-letter reason, data restrictions, and author metadata.3940## Worked preflight: a specification-test vignette4142Illustrative run of the final-hour order on a hypothetical kernel specification-test paper:43441. Venue facts reopened: fee, page norm, summary limit, and proof placement reverified on live45 RES pages; one wording change found and noted in the source map.462. Conformance: template compile gives 22 printed pages against the 20-page norm. The fix is47 moving the secondary power grid to the online appendix and merging two bandwidth tables, not48 shrinking margins; margin tricks are exactly what conformance screens catch.493. Summary count: 164 words. Cut the sentence restating the literature; the summary needs only the50 econometric object, the leading-case result, and the applied payoff.514. Scientific gate: the first two pages name the incumbent test, its size distortion under52 heteroskedasticity (illustrative: 11% rejection at nominal 5%), and the application.535. Package gate: the master script reruns the smoke simulation in about nine minutes; the README54 states that runtime.5556Result after fixes: 19.5 pages, a 148-word summary, proofs in the printed appendix — submit.5758## Editorial Express slip list5960- Metadata fields (JEL codes, keywords) inconsistent with the PDF front page.61- PDF compiled outside the RES/EctJ template, or the online appendix mixed into the main file62 instead of the separate appendix template.63- Fee handled on an outdated amount; reconfirm the current figure and VAT treatment against the64 journal's current author guidelines on submission day.65- Cover letter used for marketing; at this venue it exists for conflicts, exemption requests, and66 prior reports only.67- Replication exemption needs known to the authors but not disclosed at first submission, which68 the RES policy expects.6970## Fee and disclosure notes7172- The recorded RES policy is a flat fee per new submission with no RES-member discount, and it is73 non-refundable even on desk rejection except for genuine payment errors — budget it as a sunk74 screening cost.75- Whether a resubmission after reject-and-resubmit incurs a fresh fee depends on current policy76 wording; confirm on the live fee-policy page before assuming either answer.77- Disclosing restricted data at first submission is an RES expectation, because the editorial78 board decides whether the paper can be considered at all under the replication policy.7980## Output format8182```text83[Submission readiness] Ready / Needs fixes / Not ready84[Format checks] <template/page/summary/proofs/appendix>85[Content checks] <leading case/empirical application/simulations>86[Administrative checks] <Editorial Express/fee/cover letter/replication disclosure>87[Blocking fix] <one issue to resolve first>88```