ICASSP Submission
Run this audit against the live ICASSP paper kit on the current-year CMS portal
(cmsworkshops.com/ICASSP<year>/papers.php), not against memory. ICASSP reissues its kit each
cycle, and because the whole review pipeline assumes a uniform IEEE two-column object, the
format is checked mechanically at upload. The next major gate as of 2026-07-09 is the ICASSP
2027 full-paper deadline, reported ~16 September 2026 — verify on the live 2027 call.
The format contract: 4 + 1
An ICASSP regular paper is 4 pages of technical content — text, figures, and references all
count — with an optional 5th page that may hold only references, funding acknowledgements,
and the Compliance-with-Ethical-Standards statement. Consequences to internalize:
- There is no reviewed appendix or supplement that decides acceptance. Whatever a reviewer
must see to accept the paper lives on the four content pages.
- References compete with content on pages 1-4 unless they spill to page 5; plan the reference
budget early.
- Use the official IEEE two-column template from the paper kit with fonts, margins, and column
measure untouched, and confirm the PDF passes IEEE PDF eXpress before the portal will
accept it.
Single-blind: the inverted anonymity rule
ICASSP review is single-blind. Unlike OpenReview or ISCA venues, you must include the
author list and affiliations in the submitted PDF; reviewers see who you are, you do not see
them. The failure mode here is the opposite of an identity leak:
- A missing or wrong author block is the defect to catch, not a self-citation.
- Write self-citations in normal first person ("in our earlier work [4]"); no anonymization
gymnastics are needed.
- Acknowledgements and funding are allowed and belong on page 5, not hidden.
Portal and metadata (CMS, not CMT)
- Submission is through Conference Management Services (CMS) at
cmsworkshops.com, not
Microsoft CMT and not OpenReview — a genuine ICASSP fingerprint.
- Choose the EDICS subject category that routes the paper to the correct technical committee;
the routing decision comes from
icassp-topic-selection, not from whoever uploads.
- The CMS abstract must match the PDF abstract; it is what area organizers read.
- No single author may appear on more than 9 papers in a cycle — check co-author load early.
- Answer the dual-submission attestation honestly: the same work may not be under review at
another conference or journal simultaneously.
Desk-reject and triage table
| Trigger |
Severity at ICASSP |
Repair window |
| Fifth page carrying content beyond references/acks/ethics |
Desk reject |
None after deadline |
| Template tampering caught by PDF eXpress |
Desk reject |
None |
| Missing author list (single-blind requires it) |
Non-compliant submission |
Only before deadline |
| Missing Compliance-with-Ethical-Standards statement |
Compliance flag |
Only before deadline |
| Author on more than 9 papers |
Enforced cap |
Withdraw one before deadline |
| Dual submission to another venue |
Integrity violation |
None |
Final 72 hours, in order
- Rebuild the PDF from a clean clone; confirm the paper-kit template version is current and
PDF eXpress passes.
- Confirm the author block, affiliations, and page-5 acknowledgements/ethics statement are
present and correct — the single-blind checklist.
- Verify every figure is legible at print resolution and no float pushes past four pages.
- Set EDICS and the CMS abstract to match the PDF; declare all co-authors and their conflicts.
- Upload, download what CMS stored, and read that file end to end.
Track choice before you submit
- Standard track — 4+1 pages, TPC review, proceedings in IEEE Xplore.
- OJSP-ICASSP — 8+1 pages, reviewed by the Open Journal of Signal Processing board, open-access
publication, presented but not in the proceedings (earlier pre-registration deadline).
- SPS-journal presentation — present a recently accepted SPS-journal paper, not re-reviewed,
not in proceedings.
Confirm each track's separate deadline in the current call; see icassp-workflow.
Output format
[Submission verdict] ready / fixable / not ready
[Format] 4+1 compliance, template integrity, PDF eXpress result
[Single-blind] author list present, affiliations, page-5 acks/ethics
[Metadata] EDICS, abstract match, author list, dual-submission answer, 9-paper cap
[Track] standard / OJSP-ICASSP / journal-presentation / grand-challenge
[Blockers] <ordered list>
Currency note
The 4+1 format, single-blind policy, CMS portal, and 9-paper cap were checked 2026-07-09 against
ICASSP 2026 (Barcelona) renderings (see ../../resources/official-source-map.md). Every value is
cycle-specific; the ICASSP 2027 Toronto cycle publishes its own kit and calendar — re-open it.
1---2name: icassp-submission3description: Use when auditing an ICASSP submission before the CMS portal deadline — the IEEE 4+1 page format, the single-blind rule that the author list must appear, EDICS subject selection, the Compliance-with-Ethical-Standards statement, PDF eXpress validation, the 9-papers-per-author cap, dual-submission policy, and desk-reject triggers.4---56# ICASSP Submission78Run this audit against the live ICASSP paper kit on the current-year CMS portal9(`cmsworkshops.com/ICASSP<year>/papers.php`), not against memory. ICASSP reissues its kit each10cycle, and because the whole review pipeline assumes a uniform IEEE two-column object, the11format is checked mechanically at upload. The next major gate as of 2026-07-09 is the **ICASSP122027 full-paper deadline, reported ~16 September 2026** — verify on the live 2027 call.1314## The format contract: 4 + 11516An ICASSP regular paper is **4 pages** of technical content — text, figures, and references all17count — with an **optional 5th page** that may hold **only** references, funding acknowledgements,18and the Compliance-with-Ethical-Standards statement. Consequences to internalize:1920- There is **no reviewed appendix or supplement** that decides acceptance. Whatever a reviewer21 must see to accept the paper lives on the four content pages.22- References compete with content on pages 1-4 unless they spill to page 5; plan the reference23 budget early.24- Use the official IEEE two-column template from the paper kit with fonts, margins, and column25 measure untouched, and confirm the PDF passes **IEEE PDF eXpress** before the portal will26 accept it.2728## Single-blind: the inverted anonymity rule2930ICASSP review is **single-blind**. Unlike OpenReview or ISCA venues, you **must include the31author list and affiliations** in the submitted PDF; reviewers see who you are, you do not see32them. The failure mode here is the opposite of an identity leak:3334- A **missing or wrong author block** is the defect to catch, not a self-citation.35- Write self-citations in normal first person ("in our earlier work [4]"); no anonymization36 gymnastics are needed.37- Acknowledgements and funding are allowed and belong on page 5, not hidden.3839## Portal and metadata (CMS, not CMT)4041- Submission is through **Conference Management Services (CMS)** at `cmsworkshops.com`, not42 Microsoft CMT and not OpenReview — a genuine ICASSP fingerprint.43- Choose the **EDICS** subject category that routes the paper to the correct technical committee;44 the routing decision comes from `icassp-topic-selection`, not from whoever uploads.45- The CMS abstract must match the PDF abstract; it is what area organizers read.46- **No single author may appear on more than 9 papers** in a cycle — check co-author load early.47- Answer the dual-submission attestation honestly: the same work may not be under review at48 another conference or journal simultaneously.4950## Desk-reject and triage table5152| Trigger | Severity at ICASSP | Repair window |53|---|---|---|54| Fifth page carrying content beyond references/acks/ethics | Desk reject | None after deadline |55| Template tampering caught by PDF eXpress | Desk reject | None |56| Missing author list (single-blind requires it) | Non-compliant submission | Only before deadline |57| Missing Compliance-with-Ethical-Standards statement | Compliance flag | Only before deadline |58| Author on more than 9 papers | Enforced cap | Withdraw one before deadline |59| Dual submission to another venue | Integrity violation | None |6061## Final 72 hours, in order62631. Rebuild the PDF from a clean clone; confirm the paper-kit template version is current and64 PDF eXpress passes.652. Confirm the author block, affiliations, and page-5 acknowledgements/ethics statement are66 present and correct — the single-blind checklist.673. Verify every figure is legible at print resolution and no float pushes past four pages.684. Set EDICS and the CMS abstract to match the PDF; declare all co-authors and their conflicts.695. Upload, download what CMS stored, and read *that* file end to end.7071## Track choice before you submit7273- **Standard track** — 4+1 pages, TPC review, proceedings in IEEE Xplore.74- **OJSP-ICASSP** — 8+1 pages, reviewed by the Open Journal of Signal Processing board, open-access75 publication, presented but not in the proceedings (earlier pre-registration deadline).76- **SPS-journal presentation** — present a recently accepted SPS-journal paper, not re-reviewed,77 not in proceedings.7879Confirm each track's separate deadline in the current call; see `icassp-workflow`.8081## Output format8283```text84[Submission verdict] ready / fixable / not ready85[Format] 4+1 compliance, template integrity, PDF eXpress result86[Single-blind] author list present, affiliations, page-5 acks/ethics87[Metadata] EDICS, abstract match, author list, dual-submission answer, 9-paper cap88[Track] standard / OJSP-ICASSP / journal-presentation / grand-challenge89[Blockers] <ordered list>90```9192## Currency note9394The 4+1 format, single-blind policy, CMS portal, and 9-paper cap were checked 2026-07-09 against95ICASSP 2026 (Barcelona) renderings (see `../../resources/official-source-map.md`). Every value is96cycle-specific; the ICASSP 2027 Toronto cycle publishes its own kit and calendar — re-open it.