ITCS Submission
Run this audit before uploading to the ITCS HotCRP site. ITCS papers publish open access in
LIPIcs and are reviewed lightweight double-blind with no rebuttal, so the submitted PDF has
to be complete, self-defending, and correctly anonymized on the first and only try. Every rule
below was read from the ITCS 2026/2025 calls on 2026-07-09 via search renderings of the
itcs2026.hotcrp.com and itcs-conf.org URLs (see
../../resources/official-source-map.md); treat them as
a one-cycle snapshot and reopen the live call first.
The two-step deadline
ITCS separates the abstract/registration from the full-paper submission, and the abstract
cutoff is earlier:
- Abstract / registration locks title, abstract, authors, and conflicts (ITCS 2026:
4 September 2025, 7:59:59 PM EDT). The abstract drives PC bidding — register the real
title and abstract, not a placeholder.
- Full-paper submission uploads the anonymized PDF with complete proofs (ITCS 2026:
6 September 2025, 7:59:59 PM EDT). Miss the registration and no submission slot exists.
Format and page policy
- Single column, font size at least 11 point. Beyond that, the submission call imposes no
hard formatting template and no hard page limit (the LIPIcs
lipics-v2021 class is a
camera-ready requirement, not a submission one — see
itcs-camera-ready).
- First-10-pages merits window. It is strongly recommended that the first ~10 pages give a
clear presentation of the paper's merits, significance, innovations, and place in the
literature. Reviewers judge the idea from this window; do not bury it (see
itcs-writing-style).
- Complete proofs of all central claims must be included, in an appendix if needed. "Proof
omitted" or "see the full version" for a load-bearing claim is a substantive defect, not a
formatting one (see
itcs-supplementary).
Lightweight double-blind sweep
ITCS anonymity is lightweight: hide the authors in the PDF, but keep the references honest
and allow a public full version. The leak surface is narrower than an empirical venue's (no code,
no data), but real:
# Mechanical pass on the submission PDF
pdfinfo paper.pdf | grep -Ei 'author|creator|producer' # scrub metadata identity
pdftotext paper.pdf - | grep -nEi 'thank|acknowledg|grant|supported by|our (previous|prior|earlier) (work|paper)' | head
pdftotext paper.pdf - | grep -nEi '\\bwe (previously|earlier) (showed|proved)\\b' | head
- Remove author names, affiliations, emails, and acknowledgements/funding lines from the PDF.
- Neutralize first-person self-reference: rewrite "in our prior work [12]" as a third-person
"[Author, YEAR] showed." Do not anonymize or remove the reference itself — the reference
list stays intact (see
itcs-related-work).
- A public arXiv/ECCC/ePrint full version is allowed and encouraged; you need not delay it for
anonymity. Just keep the submitted PDF blinded.
Prior-publication and dual-submission check
- The result must not be published, presented, or under submission at another archival
conference. Papers accepted to ITCS should not then go to another archival conference.
- Simultaneous submission to a journal is allowed — a distinctive ITCS latitude; a journal
version in parallel is fine.
- Confirm the exact current wording each cycle; the archival/non-archival boundary and any
workshop carve-outs are cycle-volatile.
Desk-risk triage
| Finding at audit time |
Severity |
Real fix |
| Central claim lacks a complete proof |
Substantive reject-grade |
Add the full proof (appendix); do not defer to the preprint |
| Merits not legible within ~10 pages |
High |
Restructure so model+motivation+results come first |
| Author identity in PDF metadata/acknowledgements |
Anonymity violation |
Scrub metadata; remove acknowledgements/funding |
| First-person self-citation ("our prior [12]") |
Anonymity leak |
Rewrite in third person; keep the reference |
| References anonymized/removed |
Breaks the lightweight rule; reads evasive |
Restore normal citations |
| Abstract/authors not registered by the earlier cutoff |
No submission slot |
Nothing fixes this post-deadline — calendar it now |
| Result already at another archival venue |
Dual-submission violation |
Withdraw or reroute; journal parallel is OK |
| Font < 11pt or multi-column |
Formatting non-compliance |
Recompile single-column, >= 11pt |
Final-week order of operations
- Freeze the model and definitions early; proofs can be polished, the framing cannot churn.
- Register title/abstract/authors/conflicts before the earlier registration cutoff.
- Run the proof-completeness pass: every central claim fully proved in the PDF.
- Run the mechanical anonymity checks on the final PDF (metadata + self-reference).
- Post the full version to arXiv/ECCC/ePrint if desired (allowed); keep the submission blinded.
- Fill every HotCRP field — topics, conflicts for every coauthor's institution and recent
collaborators — a day early; late conflicts are the classic midnight failure.
- Re-download the uploaded PDF and read the first 10 pages cold to confirm the idea lands.
Reverify each cycle
- The two cutoff dates and their timezone (EDT/AoE).
- Whether the current call still runs no rebuttal and lightweight double-blind.
- The exact prior-publication/dual-submission wording and any generative-AI-disclosure rule.
- That there is still no hard page limit and the 11pt/single-column format holds.
Output format
[ITCS submission status] ready / blocked / needs work
[Registration] title/abstract/authors/conflicts locked by the earlier deadline? yes/no
[Format] single-column, >= 11pt? merits legible within ~10 pages? yes/no
[Proofs] every central claim fully proved IN the PDF (not only the preprint)? yes/no
[Anonymity] metadata clean, self-cites neutralized, references intact? yes/no
[Prior publication] not at another archival venue (journal parallel OK)? yes/no
[Fix queue] <ordered, with owners and dates before the early-September cutoff>
1---2name: itcs-submission3description: Use when auditing an ITCS submission for HotCRP readiness — the early-September abstract-then-paper deadlines, single-column >= 11pt format with no hard page limit, the first-10-pages merits window, complete proofs of all central claims, the lightweight double-blind sweep, and the archival-prior-publication check.4---56# ITCS Submission78Run this audit before uploading to the ITCS HotCRP site. ITCS papers publish **open access in9LIPIcs** and are reviewed **lightweight double-blind with no rebuttal**, so the submitted PDF has10to be complete, self-defending, and correctly anonymized on the first and only try. Every rule11below was read from the ITCS 2026/2025 calls on 2026-07-09 via search renderings of the12`itcs2026.hotcrp.com` and `itcs-conf.org` URLs (see13[`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md)); treat them as14a one-cycle snapshot and reopen the live call first.1516## The two-step deadline1718ITCS separates the **abstract/registration** from the **full-paper submission**, and the abstract19cutoff is *earlier*:2021- **Abstract / registration** locks title, abstract, authors, and conflicts (ITCS 2026:22 **4 September 2025**, 7:59:59 PM EDT). The abstract drives PC bidding — register the *real*23 title and abstract, not a placeholder.24- **Full-paper submission** uploads the anonymized PDF with complete proofs (ITCS 2026:25 **6 September 2025**, 7:59:59 PM EDT). Miss the registration and no submission slot exists.2627## Format and page policy2829- **Single column, font size at least 11 point.** Beyond that, the submission call imposes **no30 hard formatting template** and **no hard page limit** (the LIPIcs `lipics-v2021` class is a31 *camera-ready* requirement, not a submission one — see32 [`itcs-camera-ready`](../itcs-camera-ready/SKILL.md)).33- **First-10-pages merits window.** It is strongly recommended that the first ~10 pages give a34 clear presentation of the paper's merits, significance, innovations, and place in the35 literature. Reviewers judge the idea from this window; do not bury it (see36 [`itcs-writing-style`](../itcs-writing-style/SKILL.md)).37- **Complete proofs of all central claims** must be included, in an appendix if needed. "Proof38 omitted" or "see the full version" for a load-bearing claim is a substantive defect, not a39 formatting one (see [`itcs-supplementary`](../itcs-supplementary/SKILL.md)).4041## Lightweight double-blind sweep4243ITCS anonymity is **lightweight**: hide the authors *in the PDF*, but keep the references honest44and allow a public full version. The leak surface is narrower than an empirical venue's (no code,45no data), but real:4647```bash48# Mechanical pass on the submission PDF49pdfinfo paper.pdf | grep -Ei 'author|creator|producer' # scrub metadata identity50pdftotext paper.pdf - | grep -nEi 'thank|acknowledg|grant|supported by|our (previous|prior|earlier) (work|paper)' | head51pdftotext paper.pdf - | grep -nEi '\\bwe (previously|earlier) (showed|proved)\\b' | head52```5354- **Remove** author names, affiliations, emails, and acknowledgements/funding lines from the PDF.55- **Neutralize first-person self-reference:** rewrite "in our prior work [12]" as a third-person56 "[Author, YEAR] showed." Do **not** anonymize or remove the reference itself — the reference57 list stays intact (see [`itcs-related-work`](../itcs-related-work/SKILL.md)).58- **A public arXiv/ECCC/ePrint full version is allowed** and encouraged; you need not delay it for59 anonymity. Just keep the *submitted* PDF blinded.6061## Prior-publication and dual-submission check6263- The result must **not** be published, presented, or under submission at another **archival**64 conference. Papers accepted to ITCS should not then go to another archival conference.65- **Simultaneous submission to a journal is allowed** — a distinctive ITCS latitude; a journal66 version in parallel is fine.67- Confirm the exact current wording each cycle; the archival/non-archival boundary and any68 workshop carve-outs are cycle-volatile.6970## Desk-risk triage7172| Finding at audit time | Severity | Real fix |73|---|---|---|74| Central claim lacks a complete proof | Substantive reject-grade | Add the full proof (appendix); do not defer to the preprint |75| Merits not legible within ~10 pages | High | Restructure so model+motivation+results come first |76| Author identity in PDF metadata/acknowledgements | Anonymity violation | Scrub metadata; remove acknowledgements/funding |77| First-person self-citation ("our prior [12]") | Anonymity leak | Rewrite in third person; keep the reference |78| References anonymized/removed | Breaks the lightweight rule; reads evasive | Restore normal citations |79| Abstract/authors not registered by the earlier cutoff | No submission slot | Nothing fixes this post-deadline — calendar it now |80| Result already at another archival venue | Dual-submission violation | Withdraw or reroute; journal parallel is OK |81| Font < 11pt or multi-column | Formatting non-compliance | Recompile single-column, >= 11pt |8283## Final-week order of operations84851. Freeze the model and definitions early; proofs can be polished, the framing cannot churn.862. Register title/abstract/authors/conflicts before the earlier registration cutoff.873. Run the proof-completeness pass: every central claim fully proved *in the PDF*.884. Run the mechanical anonymity checks on the **final** PDF (metadata + self-reference).895. Post the full version to arXiv/ECCC/ePrint if desired (allowed); keep the submission blinded.906. Fill every HotCRP field — topics, conflicts for every coauthor's institution and recent91 collaborators — a day early; late conflicts are the classic midnight failure.927. Re-download the uploaded PDF and read the first 10 pages cold to confirm the idea lands.9394## Reverify each cycle9596- The two cutoff dates and their timezone (EDT/AoE).97- Whether the current call still runs **no rebuttal** and lightweight double-blind.98- The exact prior-publication/dual-submission wording and any generative-AI-disclosure rule.99- That there is still no hard page limit and the 11pt/single-column format holds.100101## Output format102103```text104[ITCS submission status] ready / blocked / needs work105[Registration] title/abstract/authors/conflicts locked by the earlier deadline? yes/no106[Format] single-column, >= 11pt? merits legible within ~10 pages? yes/no107[Proofs] every central claim fully proved IN the PDF (not only the preprint)? yes/no108[Anonymity] metadata clean, self-cites neutralized, references intact? yes/no109[Prior publication] not at another archival venue (journal parallel OK)? yes/no110[Fix queue] <ordered, with owners and dates before the early-September cutoff>111```