Use for the final preflight before submitting a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript via Sage Track — word target, abstract, keywords, masking, SAGE Harvard referencing, ethics statement, and ORCID. Runs the checklist; it does not draft content.
The last gate before upload. NM&S submits through Sage Track at
mc.manuscriptcentral.com/nms. This skill is a mechanical preflight: format, length, masking, and the
ethics/data statements that an anonymous, ethics-attentive interdisciplinary journal expects. Verify
every upload-field prompt on the live SAGE author-instructions page because details can change,
especially across the 2026 editorial transition. As of 2026-06-22, Steve Jones is stepping down as
Editor in June 2026 and the successor Editor(s) had not yet been publicly announced — treat all
editor-specific guidance as live-check material and confirm the current masthead before submitting.
When to trigger
The manuscript is written and analyses are final; you are about to upload
Doing a final masking, length, and policy compliance sweep
Assembling the file set Sage Track will ask for
Hard preflight checklist
Word target 8,000 — all text including notes, references, tables, and charts. Submissions
more than a few hundred words over the target are not considered. Report your count.
Abstract 150 words, unstructured, stating purpose, approach, and findings.
Keywords — at least 4, after the abstract.
Masked for anonymous review — no author names, affiliations, acknowledgments, or
self-identifying phrasing in the manuscript; provide a separate title page. You may self-cite
without naming yourself. (Confirm current masking format on the live page.)
Figures/tables legible, self-contained, and counted toward the word target.
File set (typical Sage Track; confirm at upload)
File
Contents
Anonymized manuscript
masked, with abstract, keywords, body, references, tables/figures
Title page (separate)
authors, affiliations, acknowledgments, funding, corresponding-author contact, word count
Figures (if separate)
high-resolution, captioned
Supplementary (if any)
clearly limited; not a dumping ground to evade the word target
Cover letter (if invited)
brief fit statement; not required to argue the whole case
Volatile specifics to verify
Confirm Sage Track upload fields, optional open-access fee details, and the current masthead on the
live SAGE pages. See ../../resources/official-source-map.md
for the 2026-06-20 official-source baseline.
Worked micro-example (illustrative)
Preflight on a digital-ethnography paper:
- Count: 8,240 words incl. refs/tables → over target; cut a redundant quote table + trim lit review.
- Masking: removed "in our prior fieldwork (Author 2023)" → "in prior fieldwork (Author 2023)".
- Ethics statement: IRB ref + paraphrased-quotes note added; ToS for scraped posts disclosed.
- Data statement: "Coding scheme + code available; identifiable data withheld per consent and platform ToS."
- Result: within target, masked, ethics + data statements present → ready for Sage Track.
Calibration anchors
The word target is all-inclusive and firm. References and tables count; being a few hundred over
can mean no review.
Mask before you upload. One self-identifying phrase can compromise anonymous review.
Ethics + data statements are not optional polish at an online-data journal — write them deliberately.
Anti-patterns
Submitting over the word target because "tables shouldn't count" (they do)
An unmasked manuscript or a forgotten self-identifying acknowledgment
Mixed or non-SAGE-Harvard references
No research-ethics or data-availability statement on a platform-data study
Trusting remembered limits instead of the live page during the editorial transition
Output format
【Length】words incl. notes/refs/tables vs. 8,000 target [count]
【Abstract / keywords】150 words / ≥4 keywords? [Y/N]
【Masked】no identifying info; separate title page? [Y/N]
【Referencing】SAGE Harvard, consistent? [Y/N]
【Ethics + data statements】present and accurate? [Y/N]
【Live check】Sage Track fields, OA choices, and masthead checked? [Y/N]
【Next】newms-rebuttal (after a decision)
Supplementary resources
templates/checklist.md — the copy-paste submission preflight checklist
1---2name: newms-submission3description: Use for the final preflight before submitting a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript via Sage Track — word target, abstract, keywords, masking, SAGE Harvard referencing, ethics statement, and ORCID. Runs the checklist; it does not draft content.4---56# Submission Preflight (newms-submission)78The last gate before upload. NM&S submits through **Sage Track** at9`mc.manuscriptcentral.com/nms`. This skill is a mechanical preflight: format, length, masking, and the10ethics/data statements that an anonymous, ethics-attentive interdisciplinary journal expects. **Verify11every upload-field prompt on the live SAGE author-instructions page** because details can change,12especially across the 2026 editorial transition. As of 2026-06-22, **Steve Jones is stepping down as13Editor in June 2026 and the successor Editor(s) had not yet been publicly announced** — treat all14editor-specific guidance as live-check material and confirm the current masthead before submitting.1516## When to trigger1718- The manuscript is written and analyses are final; you are about to upload19- Doing a final masking, length, and policy compliance sweep20- Assembling the file set Sage Track will ask for2122## Hard preflight checklist2324- [ ] **Word target 8,000** — *all text including notes, references, tables, and charts*. Submissions25 more than a few hundred words over the target are not considered. Report your count.26- [ ] **Abstract 150 words**, unstructured, stating purpose, approach, and findings.27- [ ] **Keywords — at least 4**, after the abstract.28- [ ] **Masked for anonymous review** — no author names, affiliations, acknowledgments, or29 self-identifying phrasing in the manuscript; provide a separate title page. You may self-cite30 without naming yourself. (Confirm current masking format on the live page.)31- [ ] **SAGE Harvard referencing** — author-date in text, alphabetical reference list; consistent.32- [ ] **Research-ethics statement** — IRB/ethics approval, consent, anonymization, and (if used) scraping33 method/ToS handled per `newms-transparency-and-data`.34- [ ] **Data-availability statement** — what is/ isn't shared and why, consistent with consent/ToS.35- [ ] **ORCID ID** for the submitting author; coauthors should link ORCID IDs before acceptance.36- [ ] **Exhibits anonymized** — screenshots redacted, quotes reverse-search-resistant.37- [ ] **Figures/tables** legible, self-contained, and counted toward the word target.3839## File set (typical Sage Track; confirm at upload)4041| File | Contents |42|------|----------|43| Anonymized manuscript | masked, with abstract, keywords, body, references, tables/figures |44| Title page (separate) | authors, affiliations, acknowledgments, funding, corresponding-author contact, word count |45| Figures (if separate) | high-resolution, captioned |46| Supplementary (if any) | clearly limited; not a dumping ground to evade the word target |47| Cover letter (if invited) | brief fit statement; not required to argue the whole case |4849## Volatile specifics to verify5051Confirm Sage Track upload fields, optional open-access fee details, and the current masthead on the52live SAGE pages. See [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md)53for the 2026-06-20 official-source baseline.5455## Worked micro-example (illustrative)5657```58Preflight on a digital-ethnography paper:59- Count: 8,240 words incl. refs/tables → over target; cut a redundant quote table + trim lit review.60- Masking: removed "in our prior fieldwork (Author 2023)" → "in prior fieldwork (Author 2023)".61- Ethics statement: IRB ref + paraphrased-quotes note added; ToS for scraped posts disclosed.62- Data statement: "Coding scheme + code available; identifiable data withheld per consent and platform ToS."63- Result: within target, masked, ethics + data statements present → ready for Sage Track.64```6566## Calibration anchors6768- **The word target is all-inclusive and firm.** References and tables count; being a few hundred over69 can mean no review.70- **Mask before you upload.** One self-identifying phrase can compromise anonymous review.71- **Ethics + data statements are not optional polish** at an online-data journal — write them deliberately.7273## Anti-patterns7475- Submitting over the word target because "tables shouldn't count" (they do)76- An unmasked manuscript or a forgotten self-identifying acknowledgment77- Mixed or non-SAGE-Harvard references78- No research-ethics or data-availability statement on a platform-data study79- Trusting remembered limits instead of the live page during the editorial transition8081## Output format8283```84【Length】words incl. notes/refs/tables vs. 8,000 target [count]85【Abstract / keywords】150 words / ≥4 keywords? [Y/N]86【Masked】no identifying info; separate title page? [Y/N]87【Referencing】SAGE Harvard, consistent? [Y/N]88【Ethics + data statements】present and accurate? [Y/N]89【Live check】Sage Track fields, OA choices, and masthead checked? [Y/N]90【Next】newms-rebuttal (after a decision)91```9293## Supplementary resources9495- [`templates/checklist.md`](templates/checklist.md) — the copy-paste submission preflight checklist96- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — portal, limits, masking, referencing facts
Run npx skillmds@latest add brycewang-stanford/newms-submission in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.
Use for the final preflight before submitting a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript via Sage Track — word target, abstract, keywords, masking, SAGE Harvard referencing, ethics statement, and ORCID. Runs the checklist; it does not draft content. It is listed under Docs & Writing on SkillMD.
This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Capability flags: docs only. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.
This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.
Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.
brycewang-stanford (@brycewang-stanford) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.