PerCom Camera Ready
Use this after acceptance. PerCom papers publish in IEEE Xplore, so the camera-ready is an
IEEE production step with its own machinery — PDF eXpress compliance and the IEEE electronic
copyright (eCopyright) form — not just a formatting pass. Reopen the current camera-ready
instructions, the decision email, and the registration/presentation pages before advising.
Camera-ready audit
- De-anonymize completely: restore the author block, affiliations, ORCIDs, acknowledgements,
funding, and the real testbed/system/dataset names that double-blind review forced you to hide.
- Apply the final format: IEEEtran
\documentclass[10pt, conference, compsocconf]{IEEEtran},
within the current page budget (9+1) plus any camera-ready allowance the acceptance letter states.
- Complete IEEE Xplore metadata: title/abstract, author order and ORCIDs, and IEEE index
terms / keywords (and ACM CCS concepts if requested). Journal-grade metadata errors are harder
to fix after publication than they look.
- Pass PDF eXpress: validate the final PDF through IEEE PDF eXpress for Xplore-compatible fonts
and embedding; a PDF that fails eXpress will not be accepted for the proceedings.
- Complete the IEEE eCopyright form: the correct copyright/rights statement must appear on the
first page as the form dictates.
- Integrate reviewer-required changes faithfully — without strengthening claims beyond what was
evaluated in the (single-round) review.
- Permanentize open data: replace every anonymized dataset/code link with a public, licensed,
DOI-issuing archive, and update the availability statement to point at it.
- Confirm registration and in-person presentation: at least one author registers and presents;
remote/pre-recorded presentation is not permitted except in stated special circumstances.
De-anonymization sweep
| Anonymized at submission |
Restore at camera-ready |
Watch for |
| Author block, affiliations, ORCID |
Full, correctly ordered |
Wrong author order breaks the DOI citation |
| Testbed / system / dataset name |
Real name throughout text, figures, dataset |
A leftover placeholder in a caption or figure |
| Acknowledgements, funding |
Restored |
Grant numbers required by funders |
| Self-citations (third person) |
Natural first-person where it aids clarity |
Over-correcting and double-citing |
| Dataset/code link |
Public archive DOI (IEEE DataPort / Zenodo) |
The old anonymized URL surviving in a footnote |
| Sensor-rig / deployment photos |
Real photos if desired |
A face or building that needs consent to publish |
IEEE Xplore production checks
[Template] IEEEtran compsocconf, current revision; no manual margin/font edits; 10pt two-column
[Metadata] title, abstract, authors+ORCID, index terms/keywords entered and matching the PDF
[PDF eXpress] final PDF validated and Xplore-compatible (fonts embedded)
[eCopyright] IEEE electronic copyright form completed; correct rights line on the first page
[References] complete, consistent; DOIs where available; within the 1 reference page
[Figures] vector where possible; readable in print greyscale; captions self-contained
[Links] every dataset/code link resolves from a logged-out browser
Worked example: integrating a rebuttal-driven clarification
The reviewers asked you to make the cross-subject nature of the headline result explicit. Camera-
ready move: reorder §4.1 so the leave-one-subject-out F1 leads and the pooled number is clearly
secondary, restore the real system name in that table, point the availability statement at the
now-public IEEE DataPort dataset, and add the ORCID and index terms — without expanding the
claim beyond what the single review round evaluated.
Dataset-release handoff
The camera-ready and any dataset/artifact deposit are related but separate tasks. Do not let the
paper's availability statement promise more than the public dataset delivers: align the statement
with what you actually deposit (a de-identified dataset under an open license with a DOI), and note
honestly anything (raw video, re-identifiable traces) that stays restricted and why
(percom-reproducibility, percom-artifact-evaluation).
Hedged logistics
- Page allowances, metadata fields, PDF eXpress and eCopyright mechanics, and exact camera-ready
dates change each cycle; confirm against the decision email and current instructions rather than a
prior year. Whether a reproducibility-badge track runs is 待核实 per edition.
Output format
[Camera-ready status] ready / needs fixes / blocked
[De-anonymization] author block / system name / acks / links restored? yes/no
[IEEE metadata] ORCID / index terms / eCopyright / PDF eXpress passed? yes/no
[Reviewer-change map] <required change -> final edit, no scope creep>
[Open data] anonymized links replaced by DOI archive? yes/no
[Remaining owner] <person -> task>
1---2name: percom-camera-ready3description: Use when preparing an accepted IEEE PerCom paper for its IEEE Xplore camera-ready, covering de-anonymization, the IEEEtran compsocconf template and page budget, IEEE Xplore metadata (PDF eXpress, eCopyright, ORCID, index terms), integrating reviewer-required changes without scope creep, permanentizing the dataset links, and IEEE production checks.4---56# PerCom Camera Ready78Use this after acceptance. PerCom papers publish in **IEEE Xplore**, so the camera-ready is an9**IEEE production step** with its own machinery — PDF eXpress compliance and the IEEE electronic10copyright (eCopyright) form — not just a formatting pass. Reopen the current camera-ready11instructions, the decision email, and the registration/presentation pages before advising.1213## Camera-ready audit1415- **De-anonymize completely:** restore the author block, affiliations, ORCIDs, acknowledgements,16 funding, and the real testbed/system/dataset names that double-blind review forced you to hide.17- **Apply the final format:** IEEEtran `\documentclass[10pt, conference, compsocconf]{IEEEtran}`,18 within the current page budget (9+1) plus any camera-ready allowance the acceptance letter states.19- **Complete IEEE Xplore metadata:** title/abstract, author order and ORCIDs, and **IEEE index20 terms / keywords** (and ACM CCS concepts if requested). Journal-grade metadata errors are harder21 to fix after publication than they look.22- **Pass PDF eXpress:** validate the final PDF through IEEE PDF eXpress for Xplore-compatible fonts23 and embedding; a PDF that fails eXpress will not be accepted for the proceedings.24- **Complete the IEEE eCopyright form:** the correct copyright/rights statement must appear on the25 first page as the form dictates.26- **Integrate reviewer-required changes** faithfully — without strengthening claims beyond what was27 evaluated in the (single-round) review.28- **Permanentize open data:** replace every anonymized dataset/code link with a public, licensed,29 DOI-issuing archive, and update the availability statement to point at it.30- **Confirm registration and in-person presentation:** at least one author registers and presents;31 remote/pre-recorded presentation is not permitted except in stated special circumstances.3233## De-anonymization sweep3435| Anonymized at submission | Restore at camera-ready | Watch for |36|---|---|---|37| Author block, affiliations, ORCID | Full, correctly ordered | Wrong author order breaks the DOI citation |38| Testbed / system / dataset name | Real name throughout text, figures, dataset | A leftover placeholder in a caption or figure |39| Acknowledgements, funding | Restored | Grant numbers required by funders |40| Self-citations (third person) | Natural first-person where it aids clarity | Over-correcting and double-citing |41| Dataset/code link | Public archive DOI (IEEE DataPort / Zenodo) | The old anonymized URL surviving in a footnote |42| Sensor-rig / deployment photos | Real photos if desired | A face or building that needs consent to publish |4344## IEEE Xplore production checks4546```text47[Template] IEEEtran compsocconf, current revision; no manual margin/font edits; 10pt two-column48[Metadata] title, abstract, authors+ORCID, index terms/keywords entered and matching the PDF49[PDF eXpress] final PDF validated and Xplore-compatible (fonts embedded)50[eCopyright] IEEE electronic copyright form completed; correct rights line on the first page51[References] complete, consistent; DOIs where available; within the 1 reference page52[Figures] vector where possible; readable in print greyscale; captions self-contained53[Links] every dataset/code link resolves from a logged-out browser54```5556## Worked example: integrating a rebuttal-driven clarification5758The reviewers asked you to make the cross-subject nature of the headline result explicit. Camera-59ready move: reorder §4.1 so the leave-one-subject-out F1 leads and the pooled number is clearly60secondary, restore the real system name in that table, point the availability statement at the61now-public IEEE DataPort dataset, and add the ORCID and index terms — **without** expanding the62claim beyond what the single review round evaluated.6364## Dataset-release handoff6566The camera-ready and any dataset/artifact deposit are related but separate tasks. Do not let the67paper's availability statement promise more than the public dataset delivers: align the statement68with what you actually deposit (a de-identified dataset under an open license with a DOI), and note69honestly anything (raw video, re-identifiable traces) that stays restricted and why70(`percom-reproducibility`, `percom-artifact-evaluation`).7172## Hedged logistics7374- Page allowances, metadata fields, PDF eXpress and eCopyright mechanics, and exact camera-ready75 dates change each cycle; confirm against the decision email and current instructions rather than a76 prior year. Whether a reproducibility-badge track runs is **待核实** per edition.7778## Output format7980```text81[Camera-ready status] ready / needs fixes / blocked82[De-anonymization] author block / system name / acks / links restored? yes/no83[IEEE metadata] ORCID / index terms / eCopyright / PDF eXpress passed? yes/no84[Reviewer-change map] <required change -> final edit, no scope creep>85[Open data] anonymized links replaced by DOI archive? yes/no86[Remaining owner] <person -> task>87```
brycewang-stanford