VIS Topic Selection
Decide the venue and the area before drafting. IEEE VIS is the flagship of the visualization
community, and since 2021 it is a single unified conference whose full papers are IEEE TVCG
journal articles across six areas. Two routing questions matter: is this a visualization
paper at all (versus HCI, graphics, or ML), and which of the six areas is its primary home.
A technically strong paper whose real lesson is about a model, a rendering primitive, or an
interaction unrelated to seeing data is respected and then rejected as out of scope.
Is it a visualization paper?
VIS rewards contributions about how people visually represent, interact with, and reason about
data. The test: if you removed the visual-representation-and-task core, is there still a paper?
If the contribution is a machine-learning model whose visualization is incidental, or a rendering
technique with no data-analysis task, or an interaction study with no visual-encoding question, a
sibling venue fits better. If the heart is the encoding, the perception, the analytic workflow, or
the visualization system, it is a VIS paper.
Choosing among the six areas (the primary-area decision)
| Your contribution's center |
Primary area |
| Theory, models, or empirical/perceptual studies establishing visualization foundations |
Theoretical & Empirical |
| An application or design study solving a real domain problem with visualization |
Applications |
| Building visualization systems, rendering algorithms, or alternate I/O modalities |
Systems & Rendering |
| Designing visual representations and interaction techniques for data/users/tasks |
Representations & Interaction |
| Algorithms that transform data to enable effective visual mapping |
Data Transformations |
| Integrated human-machine analytic workflows, decision support, ML-in-the-loop |
Analytics & Decisions |
Your primary area determines the Area Paper Chair and the reviewer pool, so choose the area whose
community will best appreciate the contribution — not merely the one that mentions your keywords.
When a paper spans two areas, pick the one carrying the primary contribution and use keywords to
signal the secondary.
Sibling-venue routing table
| Signal in your project |
Better home |
Why |
| Core visualization contribution, evidence ready, next VIS deadline works |
IEEE VIS |
The flagship; TVCG journal publication across the six areas |
| Equally strong but the European cycle lands sooner, or the topic skews European |
EuroVis / CGF |
Sibling visualization venue; different calendar, Computer Graphics Forum publication |
| Regional fit or the Pacific cycle is nearer |
PacificVis |
Sibling regional visualization venue |
| The heart is interaction/usability with no visual-encoding question |
CHI / UIST |
HCI venues; the contribution is interaction, not visualization |
| The heart is rendering/geometry with no data-analysis task |
SIGGRAPH / graphics venue |
Graphics contribution, not visualization |
| The study is too long/nuanced for the 9-page budget, or you want a journal-first path |
IEEE TVCG (journal track) |
The same journal, entered directly rather than through the VIS call |
Contribution shapes VIS rewards
- New visual encoding or interaction technique — a representation or interaction that lets people
do an analysis task better, justified perceptually and evaluated (the UpSet lineage).
- System / toolkit — an integration that changes how visualizations are built or used, shown in
real use (the D3 lineage).
- Perceptual / empirical study — a controlled result about how people read visualizations that
changes design practice (the "what makes a visualization memorable?" lineage).
- Design study — a real domain problem solved with visualization and reflected into transferable
lessons (the design-study-methodology lineage).
- Model / theory / methodology — a framework that improves how the field designs or evaluates
(the nested-model lineage) — the "foundations" the venue is built on.
The remove-the-visualization and re-label tests
Two quick tests sharpen a borderline verdict:
- Remove-the-visualization test: if you deleted the visual-representation-and-task core, is there
still a contribution? If the model or the renderer is the whole paper, route to ML or graphics.
- Re-label test: could this be submitted to CHI or SIGGRAPH unchanged and read as native there?
If its heart is interaction usability or rendering, route accordingly; VIS rewards the
data-representation-and-reasoning framing.
Evidence maturity, without the ladder cliché
Fit is necessary but not sufficient: the same idea sits at different doors depending on how far the
evidence has come. An encoding idea with a sketch but no study is a poster or short paper; a system
demonstrated only on data you chose needs a real study or expert use before the full-paper track; a
study too deep for the 9-page budget may belong in the TVCG journal track first. Submitting one step
early earns a "promising, but..." and costs a full annual cycle.
Decision procedure
[Is-it-VIS] remove the visual-representation-and-task core -> still a paper? no => VIS; yes => reroute
[Contribution type] technique / system / perceptual-study / design-study / model
[Primary area] map the contribution's center to one of the six areas
[Sibling check] interaction-only -> CHI/UIST; rendering-only -> SIGGRAPH; European/Pacific cycle -> EuroVis/PacificVis
[Length check] too long for 9+2? -> consider the TVCG journal track
[Verdict] IEEE VIS (area X) / sibling venue / journal-first, with a one-line reason
Run this before the writing skills; a wrong venue or area decision wastes every later step. When the
verdict is VIS, continue with vis-workflow for the calendar and vis-writing-style for the paper
shape.
1---2name: vis-topic-selection3description: Use when deciding whether a project belongs at IEEE VIS or should be routed to EuroVis, PacificVis, CHI, a graphics venue, or the IEEE TVCG journal track, and when choosing among the six VIS areas (Theoretical & Empirical, Applications, Systems & Rendering, Representations & Interaction, Data Transformations, Analytics & Decisions) by contribution type and evidence maturity.4---56# VIS Topic Selection78Decide the venue and the area before drafting. IEEE VIS is the flagship of the visualization9community, and since 2021 it is a **single unified conference** whose full papers are **IEEE TVCG10journal articles** across **six areas**. Two routing questions matter: **is this a visualization11paper at all** (versus HCI, graphics, or ML), and **which of the six areas** is its primary home.12A technically strong paper whose real lesson is about a model, a rendering primitive, or an13interaction unrelated to seeing data is respected and then rejected as out of scope.1415## Is it a visualization paper?1617VIS rewards contributions about **how people visually represent, interact with, and reason about18data**. The test: if you removed the *visual-representation-and-task* core, is there still a paper?19If the contribution is a machine-learning model whose visualization is incidental, or a rendering20technique with no data-analysis task, or an interaction study with no visual-encoding question, a21sibling venue fits better. If the heart is the encoding, the perception, the analytic workflow, or22the visualization system, it is a VIS paper.2324## Choosing among the six areas (the primary-area decision)2526| Your contribution's center | Primary area |27|---|---|28| Theory, models, or empirical/perceptual studies establishing visualization foundations | **Theoretical & Empirical** |29| An application or design study solving a real domain problem with visualization | **Applications** |30| Building visualization systems, rendering algorithms, or alternate I/O modalities | **Systems & Rendering** |31| Designing visual representations and interaction techniques for data/users/tasks | **Representations & Interaction** |32| Algorithms that transform data to enable effective visual mapping | **Data Transformations** |33| Integrated human-machine analytic workflows, decision support, ML-in-the-loop | **Analytics & Decisions** |3435Your primary area determines the Area Paper Chair and the reviewer pool, so choose the area whose36community will best appreciate the contribution — not merely the one that mentions your keywords.37When a paper spans two areas, pick the one carrying the **primary** contribution and use keywords to38signal the secondary.3940## Sibling-venue routing table4142| Signal in your project | Better home | Why |43|---|---|---|44| Core visualization contribution, evidence ready, next VIS deadline works | **IEEE VIS** | The flagship; TVCG journal publication across the six areas |45| Equally strong but the European cycle lands sooner, or the topic skews European | **EuroVis / CGF** | Sibling visualization venue; different calendar, Computer Graphics Forum publication |46| Regional fit or the Pacific cycle is nearer | **PacificVis** | Sibling regional visualization venue |47| The heart is interaction/usability with no visual-encoding question | **CHI / UIST** | HCI venues; the contribution is interaction, not visualization |48| The heart is rendering/geometry with no data-analysis task | **SIGGRAPH / graphics venue** | Graphics contribution, not visualization |49| The study is too long/nuanced for the 9-page budget, or you want a journal-first path | **IEEE TVCG (journal track)** | The same journal, entered directly rather than through the VIS call |5051## Contribution shapes VIS rewards5253- **New visual encoding or interaction technique** — a representation or interaction that lets people54 do an analysis task better, justified perceptually and evaluated (the UpSet lineage).55- **System / toolkit** — an integration that changes how visualizations are built or used, shown in56 real use (the D3 lineage).57- **Perceptual / empirical study** — a controlled result about how people read visualizations that58 changes design practice (the "what makes a visualization memorable?" lineage).59- **Design study** — a real domain problem solved with visualization and reflected into transferable60 lessons (the design-study-methodology lineage).61- **Model / theory / methodology** — a framework that improves how the field designs or evaluates62 (the nested-model lineage) — the "foundations" the venue is built on.6364## The remove-the-visualization and re-label tests6566Two quick tests sharpen a borderline verdict:6768- **Remove-the-visualization test:** if you deleted the visual-representation-and-task core, is there69 still a contribution? If the model or the renderer is the whole paper, route to ML or graphics.70- **Re-label test:** could this be submitted to CHI or SIGGRAPH unchanged and read as native there?71 If its heart is interaction usability or rendering, route accordingly; VIS rewards the72 data-representation-and-reasoning framing.7374## Evidence maturity, without the ladder cliché7576Fit is necessary but not sufficient: the same idea sits at different doors depending on how far the77evidence has come. An encoding idea with a sketch but no study is a poster or short paper; a system78demonstrated only on data you chose needs a real study or expert use before the full-paper track; a79study too deep for the 9-page budget may belong in the TVCG journal track first. Submitting one step80early earns a "promising, but..." and costs a full annual cycle.8182## Decision procedure8384```text85[Is-it-VIS] remove the visual-representation-and-task core -> still a paper? no => VIS; yes => reroute86[Contribution type] technique / system / perceptual-study / design-study / model87[Primary area] map the contribution's center to one of the six areas88[Sibling check] interaction-only -> CHI/UIST; rendering-only -> SIGGRAPH; European/Pacific cycle -> EuroVis/PacificVis89[Length check] too long for 9+2? -> consider the TVCG journal track90[Verdict] IEEE VIS (area X) / sibling venue / journal-first, with a one-line reason91```9293Run this before the writing skills; a wrong venue or area decision wastes every later step. When the94verdict is VIS, continue with `vis-workflow` for the calendar and `vis-writing-style` for the paper95shape.
brycewang-stanford