Writing AI Conference Papers — Skill Router
This skill packages the community handbook "Writing AI Conference Papers: A Handbook for Beginners" so it can be applied directly to a user's manuscript. The full source text lives under reference/ and is the authoritative content — do not rely on memory; load the relevant reference section before advising.
reference/handbook.md— the complete handbook (idea → framework → introduction → related work → readability → defensibility → checklists → review/appendix).reference/not-good-ideas.md— patterns of research ideas that tend to fail review (compute-overwhelming, hyperparameter tuning, minor tweaks, incremental designs, weak evaluation, "ultimate" methods).
Routing protocol
Every time this skill is invoked:
Identify the task axis from the request and map it to the handbook section(s):
- "Is my idea worth doing?" / topic selection / novelty worry →
reference/handbook.md§"Build a Paper from Scratch → Find the Core Idea" andreference/not-good-ideas.md. - Paper structure / outline / framework → §"Construct the Framework".
- Introduction drafting or rewriting → §"Write an Introduction".
- Related work → §"Describe the Related Work".
- Make it clearer / reviewers misunderstand / writing quality → §"Readability Improvement" (Logical Strength, Defensibility, Shorten Confusion Time, Information Density, Detail Checklist).
- Deadline crunch / final pass → §"Appendix → Checklist for the Last Few Hours".
- Anticipating or answering reviews / rebuttal → §"Appendix → Common Negative Review Comments" and §"If the Paper is Not Accepted".
- Venue choice / timeline → §"Appendix → AI Conference List" and §"AI Paper Production and Publication".
- "Is my idea worth doing?" / topic selection / novelty worry →
Read the matched section(s) from
reference/in full before responding. Quote or paraphrase the handbook's concrete advice; do not invent rules it does not state.Apply it to the user's material. When the user provides a draft, claim, idea, or section, diagnose it against the handbook's principles (logical strength, defensibility, confusion time, information density) and produce specific, actionable edits — not generic writing tips.
Stay honest about scope. This handbook is opinionated guidance aimed at beginners writing AI conference papers. It does not replace the target venue's official formatting/policy requirements; flag when the user should consult the call-for-papers.
Style of help
- Be concrete and example-driven, mirroring the handbook's tone.
- When critiquing an idea, name the failure pattern from
not-good-ideas.mdif one applies, then suggest how to strengthen it. - When editing prose, preserve the author's technical meaning and contribution while fixing structure, clarity, and defensibility.