Check

Check a plugin

Run the checks. Read what came back. Do not summarise another tool's output into your own words; the wording is theirs and so is the fix.

bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/run-checks.sh <plugin-dir>

Add --strict to fail on warnings as well as errors.

Exit codes: 0 everything was examined and clean, 1 at least one check found something, 2 bad arguments, 3 nothing failed but something could not be looked at. Three is not a soft pass: a machine without the claude CLI lands there, because the first-party validator did not run.

What runs

The runner prints each tool's output verbatim and then a summary table. It does not filter or rewrite anything.

The agent validator has two known behaviours. It stops at the first finding, so a short report is not a clean file, and it reports a missing model or color as an error when both are optional. Do not act on those two. After fixing what it names, run it again rather than treating one pass as a full list.

Two plugin-dev scripts are deliberately not run. validate-hook-schema.sh crashes on the standard hooks.json shape, and validate-settings.sh reads a settings file rather than a plugin. The runner says so where they would have run.

What our three checks are for, and what they refuse to do

They exist because of one test: does the check encode a fact Anthropic can change? If it does, it is not here, however useful it looks. Hook event names, model tiers, reserved marketplace names, manifest key allowlists, character caps and enum members are all facts with an owner, and a check that writes one down is wrong the day the owner changes it. That is what the plugin this replaced spent 54 rule identifiers and 121 checkable items doing.

What is left is structure and self-consistency, which cannot go stale:

• E-series, external components. The same defect that hard-errors inline in plugin.json passes clean in an external file. Three monitor entries with a repeated name inline give "Found 1 error"; the identical content at ./config/monitors.json gives "Validation passed with warnings" and exit 0. So: does the declared path resolve, does it stay inside the plugin, does the file parse, does it repeat a key, do two entries collide on an identifier. Nothing about which fields belong in it.
• S-series, self-consistency. The same entry granted and denied in one frontmatter block. A frontmatter fence that is not on line one, so the whole block is inert. An execution line inside a fenced example, which the loader runs anyway — this is why plugin-dev:command-development cannot be invoked at all in a repository without an npm test script.
• P-series, containment. An absolute home path, a credential, a personal address, on their way to a public marketplace.

When a check says UNCHECKED

That is not a pass. It means the check could not look: the CLI is absent, python3 or PyYAML is missing, or there was nothing of that kind to read. The summary counts it separately from both PASS and FAIL, and the run exits 3 rather than 0 when nothing ran at all. A false all-clear is worse than silence.

Output

Prints to stdout. Writes nothing.