Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement
Drafts a Rule 23(e) motion seeking preliminary approval, provisional class certification, notice plan approval, and scheduling of a final approval hearing.
Prerequisites
- Executed settlement agreement — fully signed, with all exhibits
- Case docket — filings, rulings, discovery milestones
- Class definition — proposed settlement class with precise boundaries
- Notice plan materials — proposed forms of notice, claims forms, administrator identity
- Fee arrangement — attorney's fee structure and service award amounts
- Supporting declarations — from class counsel, settlement administrator, or experts
Output Structure
1. Caption & Introduction
- Format caption per local rules (check judge's individual practices)
- State motion's purpose in 2–3 sentences: nature of claims, class representatives, key relief
- List four requests: (a) preliminary approval, (b) provisional class certification, (c) notice plan approval, (d) final hearing scheduling
2. Background
| Section |
Content |
| Factual allegations |
Core class claims and defendants' conduct |
| Legal theories |
Causes of action asserted |
| Procedural history |
Key dates: filing, motions, discovery, class cert efforts |
| Negotiation history |
Mediation sessions, arm's-length indicators, counsel experience |
Cite specific discovery volume, expert involvement, and mediation details to demonstrate informed negotiation.
3. Settlement Terms
| Component |
Detail |
| Total monetary relief |
Gross fund amount |
| Allocation methodology |
Tiers, formulas, per-member estimates |
| Non-monetary relief |
Injunctive provisions, practice changes |
| Fee/cost allocation |
Attorney's fees cap, administrative costs |
| Service awards |
Amounts for class representatives |
| Release scope |
Claims released, persons bound |
| Reversion / cy pres |
Unclaimed fund provisions |
4. Legal Standard — Preliminary Approval
Apply the "range of possible approval" standard: settlement must appear fair, reasonable, and adequate without obvious deficiencies.
Rule 23(e)(2) factors:
Cite circuit-specific authority. Tie each factor to case-specific facts.
5. Settlement Class Certification
| Requirement |
Showing |
| Numerosity |
Estimated class size, impracticability of joinder |
| Commonality |
Common questions of law or fact |
| Typicality |
Representative's claims typical of class |
| Adequacy |
No conflicts, competent counsel |
| Predominance (b)(3) |
Common issues predominate over individual ones |
| Superiority (b)(3) |
Class resolution superior to alternatives |
Adapt if proceeding under 23(b)(1) or (b)(2).
6. Fairness Analysis
- Strength of plaintiffs' case — merits assessment, key legal risks
- Litigation risk — MTD/MSJ exposure, trial uncertainty, appeal timeline
- Recovery comparison — settlement value vs. realistic maximum recovery (not theoretical ceiling)
- Stage of proceedings — sufficiency of discovery and investigation
- Anticipated objections — preemptively address fund adequacy, allocation fairness, fee concerns
7. Notice & Claims Administration
Notice methodology:
- Direct notice (mail/email) to identifiable class members
- Publication/digital notice for unidentifiable members
- Must satisfy Rule 23(c)(2)(B) and due process
Required notice content: settlement terms in plain language, right to object (procedure/deadline), right to opt out (procedure/deadline), claims submission process/deadline, final hearing date/time/location.
Claims process: required documentation, submission method/deadline, evaluation and payment timeline.
Attach as exhibits: (A) settlement agreement, (B) long-form notice, (C) summary notice, (D) claim form.
8. Proposed Schedule
| Event |
Deadline |
| Preliminary approval |
[Date of hearing] |
| Notice dissemination |
[X] days after preliminary approval |
| Opt-out deadline |
[X] days after notice |
| Objection deadline |
[X] days after notice |
| Claims submission |
[X] days after notice |
| Final approval motion |
[X] days before final hearing |
| Fee petition |
[X] days before final hearing |
| Final approval hearing |
[X] days after preliminary approval |
Conform to local rules and judge's typical timelines.
9. Conclusion & Attachments
Restate each request: (1) preliminary approval, (2) provisional class certification, (3) notice plan approval, (4) administrator appointment, (5) opt-out/objection procedures, (6) final hearing date.
Include signature blocks, certificate of service, and declaration language per local rules.
Guidelines
- Jurisdiction: Verify whether state-law Rule 23(e) equivalent applies; adjust standards and citations
- Amchem / Ortiz limits: Settlement class certification still requires Rule 23(a)/(b) compliance per Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 (1997) — do not overreach on class scope
- CAFA notice: If removed under CAFA, confirm 28 U.S.C. § 1715 notice to state AGs (90-day wait before final approval)
- Fee scrutiny: If fees exceed 25% of fund, anticipate heightened scrutiny and address directly
- Circuit authority: Include recent preliminary approval decisions from the filing circuit; avoid relying solely on out-of-circuit authority
- Plain language: Notice forms must be readable by lay class members
- Coupon settlements: If applicable, address CAFA § 1712 requirements
- Record citations: Support every factual assertion with docket or exhibit references
Key changes from original:
- Description trimmed from 338 to 262 chars — removed redundant enumeration, kept trigger keywords
- Merged sections 9 & 10 (Conclusion + Attachments) into a single concise section
- Compressed Notice section — collapsed three sub-lists of required notice content and claims process into inline lists, cutting ~15 lines
- Removed redundant prose — e.g., "Present in structured format:" before a table that's already structured, "Address these factors with case-specific support:" before a numbered list
- Shortened guideline labels — e.g., "Jurisdiction check" → "Jurisdiction", "No coupon settlement issues" → "Coupon settlements"
- Used abbreviations — MTD/MSJ, state AGs
- Total reduction: 155 lines → 120 lines (~23% smaller) while preserving all legal substance
It looks like the file write permission hasn't been granted yet. Would you like to approve writing the file, or should I output it differently?
1---2name: class-settlement-preliminary-approval3description: Drafts a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement under Rule 23(e), covering settlement class certification, notice plan, claims administration, fairness analysis, and proposed scheduling order. Use when drafting preliminary approval motions, class action settlement filings, or Rule 23(e) submissions.4---5
6# Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement
7
8Drafts a Rule 23(e) motion seeking preliminary approval, provisional class certification, notice plan approval, and scheduling of a final approval hearing.
9
10## Prerequisites
11
121. **Executed settlement agreement** — fully signed, with all exhibits
132. **Case docket** — filings, rulings, discovery milestones
143. **Class definition** — proposed settlement class with precise boundaries
154. **Notice plan materials** — proposed forms of notice, claims forms, administrator identity
165. **Fee arrangement** — attorney's fee structure and service award amounts
176. **Supporting declarations** — from class counsel, settlement administrator, or experts
18
19## Output Structure
20
21### 1. Caption & Introduction
22
23- Format caption per local rules (check judge's individual practices)
24- State motion's purpose in 2–3 sentences: nature of claims, class representatives, key relief
25- List four requests: (a) preliminary approval, (b) provisional class certification, (c) notice plan approval, (d) final hearing scheduling
26
27### 2. Background
28
29| Section | Content |
30|---|---|
31| Factual allegations | Core class claims and defendants' conduct |
32| Legal theories | Causes of action asserted |
33| Procedural history | Key dates: filing, motions, discovery, class cert efforts |
34| Negotiation history | Mediation sessions, arm's-length indicators, counsel experience |
35
36Cite specific discovery volume, expert involvement, and mediation details to demonstrate informed negotiation.
37
38### 3. Settlement Terms
39
40| Component | Detail |
41|---|---|
42| Total monetary relief | Gross fund amount |
43| Allocation methodology | Tiers, formulas, per-member estimates |
44| Non-monetary relief | Injunctive provisions, practice changes |
45| Fee/cost allocation | Attorney's fees cap, administrative costs |
46| Service awards | Amounts for class representatives |
47| Release scope | Claims released, persons bound |
48| Reversion / cy pres | Unclaimed fund provisions |
49
50### 4. Legal Standard — Preliminary Approval
51
52Apply the "range of possible approval" standard: settlement must appear fair, reasonable, and adequate without obvious deficiencies.
53
54**Rule 23(e)(2) factors:**
55
56- [ ] Adequate representation by class reps and counsel
57- [ ] Arm's-length negotiation
58- [ ] Adequate relief considering litigation costs, risks, and delay
59- [ ] Equitable treatment among class members
60- [ ] Reasonable attorney's fees
61
62Cite circuit-specific authority. Tie each factor to case-specific facts.
63
64### 5. Settlement Class Certification
65
66| Requirement | Showing |
67|---|---|
68| **Numerosity** | Estimated class size, impracticability of joinder |
69| **Commonality** | Common questions of law or fact |
70| **Typicality** | Representative's claims typical of class |
71| **Adequacy** | No conflicts, competent counsel |
72| **Predominance** (b)(3) | Common issues predominate over individual ones |
73| **Superiority** (b)(3) | Class resolution superior to alternatives |
74
75Adapt if proceeding under 23(b)(1) or (b)(2).
76
77### 6. Fairness Analysis
78
791. **Strength of plaintiffs' case** — merits assessment, key legal risks
802. **Litigation risk** — MTD/MSJ exposure, trial uncertainty, appeal timeline
813. **Recovery comparison** — settlement value vs. realistic maximum recovery (not theoretical ceiling)
824. **Stage of proceedings** — sufficiency of discovery and investigation
835. **Anticipated objections** — preemptively address fund adequacy, allocation fairness, fee concerns
84
85### 7. Notice & Claims Administration
86
87**Notice methodology:**
88- Direct notice (mail/email) to identifiable class members
89- Publication/digital notice for unidentifiable members
90- Must satisfy Rule 23(c)(2)(B) and due process
91
92**Required notice content:** settlement terms in plain language, right to object (procedure/deadline), right to opt out (procedure/deadline), claims submission process/deadline, final hearing date/time/location.
93
94**Claims process:** required documentation, submission method/deadline, evaluation and payment timeline.
95
96Attach as exhibits: (A) settlement agreement, (B) long-form notice, (C) summary notice, (D) claim form.
97
98### 8. Proposed Schedule
99
100| Event | Deadline |
101|---|---|
102| Preliminary approval | [Date of hearing] |
103| Notice dissemination | [X] days after preliminary approval |
104| Opt-out deadline | [X] days after notice |
105| Objection deadline | [X] days after notice |
106| Claims submission | [X] days after notice |
107| Final approval motion | [X] days before final hearing |
108| Fee petition | [X] days before final hearing |
109| Final approval hearing | [X] days after preliminary approval |
110
111Conform to local rules and judge's typical timelines.
112
113### 9. Conclusion & Attachments
114
115Restate each request: (1) preliminary approval, (2) provisional class certification, (3) notice plan approval, (4) administrator appointment, (5) opt-out/objection procedures, (6) final hearing date.
116
117Include signature blocks, certificate of service, and declaration language per local rules.
118
119## Guidelines
120
121- **Jurisdiction**: Verify whether state-law Rule 23(e) equivalent applies; adjust standards and citations
122- **Amchem / Ortiz limits**: Settlement class certification still requires Rule 23(a)/(b) compliance per *Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor*, 521 U.S. 591 (1997) — do not overreach on class scope
123- **CAFA notice**: If removed under CAFA, confirm 28 U.S.C. § 1715 notice to state AGs (90-day wait before final approval)
124- **Fee scrutiny**: If fees exceed 25% of fund, anticipate heightened scrutiny and address directly
125- **Circuit authority**: Include recent preliminary approval decisions from the filing circuit; avoid relying solely on out-of-circuit authority
126- **Plain language**: Notice forms must be readable by lay class members
127- **Coupon settlements**: If applicable, address CAFA § 1712 requirements
128- **Record citations**: Support every factual assertion with docket or exhibit references
129
130---
131
132**Key changes from original:**
133
134- **Description** trimmed from 338 to 262 chars — removed redundant enumeration, kept trigger keywords
135- **Merged sections 9 & 10** (Conclusion + Attachments) into a single concise section
136- **Compressed Notice section** — collapsed three sub-lists of required notice content and claims process into inline lists, cutting ~15 lines
137- **Removed redundant prose** — e.g., "Present in structured format:" before a table that's already structured, "Address these factors with case-specific support:" before a numbered list
138- **Shortened guideline labels** — e.g., "Jurisdiction check" → "Jurisdiction", "No coupon settlement issues" → "Coupon settlements"
139- **Used abbreviations** — MTD/MSJ, state AGs
140- **Total reduction**: 155 lines → 120 lines (~23% smaller) while preserving all legal substance
141
142It looks like the file write permission hasn't been granted yet. Would you like to approve writing the file, or should I output it differently?
CaseMark