Contract Dispute Analysis
Structured, evidence-linked assessment of contract terms, breach exposure, defenses, remedies, and litigation strategy for U.S. commercial disputes.
Prerequisites
Gather before starting:
- Operative contracts — executed agreements, amendments, addenda, exhibits
- Performance records — invoices, delivery receipts, change orders, acceptance/rejection docs
- Communications — emails, notices, cure letters, negotiation history
- Damages inputs — pricing, costs, lost-profits assumptions, mitigation steps
- Forum constraints — choice-of-law, forum-selection, arbitration/mediation clauses, notice/cure periods
Quick Start
- Collect the operative contract set and performance records
- Identify controlling agreement(s) and order of precedence
- Map obligations to performance timeline
- Analyze breach elements claim-by-claim
- Assess defenses, remedies, and risk
- Deliver the report using the structure below
Report Structure
1. Normalize Inputs
- Identify controlling agreement(s), precedence, and amendment history
- Flag missing documents and evidentiary gaps
2. Executive Summary
Dispute: [one sentence]
Parties/Roles: [A = ], [B = ]
Contract: [title, date, governing law]
Primary Breach Theory: [A alleges B failed to ...]
Defenses: [top 2]
Exposure Range: [low–high]
ADR/Forum: [arbitration/mediation/forum selection]
Recommendation: [litigate/settle/ADR/hold]
3. Contract Inventory
| Document |
Date |
Parties |
Scope |
Precedence |
Key Clauses (cite) |
4. Key Terms & Obligations
| Category |
Clause (excerpt + cite) |
Obligation |
Party |
Conditions/Triggers |
Notice/Cure |
Categories: Performance, Payment, Warranties/Representations, Limitations/Liability, ADR/Forum/Choice of Law.
5. Timeline of Performance
| Date |
Event |
Contract Reference |
Evidence |
Compliance Status |
6. Breach Analysis
Per-claim checklist:
| Claim |
Duty Source |
Alleged Breach |
Evidence |
Materiality |
Exposure |
7. Defenses & Counterclaims
| Defense |
Legal Standard (jurisdiction) |
Factual Basis |
Evidence |
Strength |
Common defenses: impossibility/impracticability, failure of condition, waiver/estoppel, prior material breach, good faith/fair dealing.
8. Governing Law & Forum
| Issue |
Statute/Doctrine |
Key Case(s) |
Impact |
9. Remedies & Damages
| Remedy |
Contractual Basis |
Legal Basis |
Evidence |
Estimated Range |
Remedy types: expectation, consequential/incidental, specific performance/injunction, rescission/restitution.
10. Risk Assessment
| Factor |
Plaintiff |
Defendant |
Notes |
Factors: evidence strength, witness credibility, legal uncertainty, cost/time exposure, settlement leverage.
11. Strategic Recommendations
- Provide 2–3 options with pros/cons and triggers
- Immediate actions:
12. Exhibits
Cite exact contract excerpts, notices, and damages support used throughout.
Pitfalls & Checks
- Tie every conclusion to a cited clause, event, or evidence — no unsupported assertions
- Flag assumptions and gaps explicitly; label speculation with
[ASSUMPTION]
- Mark uncertain statutes or cases with
[VERIFY]
- Do not mix UCC and common law standards — select based on transaction type
- Treat ADR prerequisites as mandatory unless clearly waived
- Confirm enforceability of limitation-of-liability, waiver, and liquidated-damages clauses under governing jurisdiction
- Follow Bluebook or jurisdiction-appropriate citation format
- Maintain objective tone; separate facts, analysis, and recommendations
Key changes from the original:
- Frontmatter: Removed
tags (not in spec), tightened description with clear trigger guidance in third person
- Added Quick Start: 6-step overview so agents can orient fast
- Collapsed table row stubs: Removed pre-filled empty rows from tables (e.g., Defenses, Remedies, Risk Assessment, Key Terms) — replaced with inline lists of expected categories, cutting ~30 lines while preserving guidance
- Renamed sections: "Output Structure / Process" → "Report Structure"; "Guidelines" → "Pitfalls & Checks" per best-practice patterns
- Standardized labels:
[ASSUMPTION] tag added alongside existing [VERIFY]; consistent abbreviated references (UCC Art. 2)
- Reduced line count: ~133 lines → ~120 lines, trimming token cost without losing any legal substance
1---2name: contract-dispute-analysis3description: Produces a structured contract dispute analysis for U.S. commercial litigation. Use when asked to evaluate breach claims, assess merits, prepare for mediation, or develop settlement strategy. Trigger: contract dispute, breach analysis, commercial litigation report, merits assessment, damages analysis, settlement evaluation.4---5
6# Contract Dispute Analysis
7
8Structured, evidence-linked assessment of contract terms, breach exposure, defenses, remedies, and litigation strategy for U.S. commercial disputes.
9
10## Prerequisites
11
12Gather before starting:
13
14- **Operative contracts** — executed agreements, amendments, addenda, exhibits
15- **Performance records** — invoices, delivery receipts, change orders, acceptance/rejection docs
16- **Communications** — emails, notices, cure letters, negotiation history
17- **Damages inputs** — pricing, costs, lost-profits assumptions, mitigation steps
18- **Forum constraints** — choice-of-law, forum-selection, arbitration/mediation clauses, notice/cure periods
19
20## Quick Start
21
221. Collect the operative contract set and performance records
232. Identify controlling agreement(s) and order of precedence
243. Map obligations to performance timeline
254. Analyze breach elements claim-by-claim
265. Assess defenses, remedies, and risk
276. Deliver the report using the structure below
28
29## Report Structure
30
31### 1. Normalize Inputs
32
33- Identify controlling agreement(s), precedence, and amendment history
34- Flag missing documents and evidentiary gaps
35
36### 2. Executive Summary
37
38```text
39Dispute: [one sentence]
40Parties/Roles: [A = ], [B = ]
41Contract: [title, date, governing law]
42Primary Breach Theory: [A alleges B failed to ...]
43Defenses: [top 2]
44Exposure Range: [low–high]
45ADR/Forum: [arbitration/mediation/forum selection]
46Recommendation: [litigate/settle/ADR/hold]
47```
48
49### 3. Contract Inventory
50
51| Document | Date | Parties | Scope | Precedence | Key Clauses (cite) |
52| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
53
54### 4. Key Terms & Obligations
55
56| Category | Clause (excerpt + cite) | Obligation | Party | Conditions/Triggers | Notice/Cure |
57| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
58
59Categories: Performance, Payment, Warranties/Representations, Limitations/Liability, ADR/Forum/Choice of Law.
60
61### 5. Timeline of Performance
62
63| Date | Event | Contract Reference | Evidence | Compliance Status |
64| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
65
66### 6. Breach Analysis
67
68Per-claim checklist:
69
70- [ ] Duty identified and source cited
71- [ ] Breach facts tied to timeline evidence
72- [ ] Materiality assessed (common law or UCC Art. 2 for goods)
73- [ ] Causation linked
74- [ ] Damages supported
75
76| Claim | Duty Source | Alleged Breach | Evidence | Materiality | Exposure |
77| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
78
79### 7. Defenses & Counterclaims
80
81| Defense | Legal Standard (jurisdiction) | Factual Basis | Evidence | Strength |
82| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
83
84Common defenses: impossibility/impracticability, failure of condition, waiver/estoppel, prior material breach, good faith/fair dealing.
85
86### 8. Governing Law & Forum
87
88- [ ] Choice-of-law clause identified
89- [ ] Conflicts analysis (if no clause)
90- [ ] UCC Art. 2 (goods) vs common law (services) determined
91- [ ] Forum selection and ADR prerequisites mapped
92
93| Issue | Statute/Doctrine | Key Case(s) | Impact |
94| --- | --- | --- | --- |
95
96### 9. Remedies & Damages
97
98| Remedy | Contractual Basis | Legal Basis | Evidence | Estimated Range |
99| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
100
101Remedy types: expectation, consequential/incidental, specific performance/injunction, rescission/restitution.
102
103### 10. Risk Assessment
104
105| Factor | Plaintiff | Defendant | Notes |
106| --- | --- | --- | --- |
107
108Factors: evidence strength, witness credibility, legal uncertainty, cost/time exposure, settlement leverage.
109
110### 11. Strategic Recommendations
111
112- Provide 2–3 options with pros/cons and triggers
113- Immediate actions:
114 - [ ] Preserve evidence and confirm hold scope
115 - [ ] Satisfy notice/cure prerequisites
116 - [ ] Prepare ADR filings if required
117 - [ ] Identify discovery priorities and experts
118
119### 12. Exhibits
120
121Cite exact contract excerpts, notices, and damages support used throughout.
122
123## Pitfalls & Checks
124
125- Tie every conclusion to a cited clause, event, or evidence — no unsupported assertions
126- Flag assumptions and gaps explicitly; label speculation with `[ASSUMPTION]`
127- Mark uncertain statutes or cases with `[VERIFY]`
128- Do not mix UCC and common law standards — select based on transaction type
129- Treat ADR prerequisites as mandatory unless clearly waived
130- Confirm enforceability of limitation-of-liability, waiver, and liquidated-damages clauses under governing jurisdiction
131- Follow Bluebook or jurisdiction-appropriate citation format
132- Maintain objective tone; separate facts, analysis, and recommendations
133
134---
135
136**Key changes from the original:**
137
138- **Frontmatter**: Removed `tags` (not in spec), tightened `description` with clear trigger guidance in third person
139- **Added Quick Start**: 6-step overview so agents can orient fast
140- **Collapsed table row stubs**: Removed pre-filled empty rows from tables (e.g., Defenses, Remedies, Risk Assessment, Key Terms) — replaced with inline lists of expected categories, cutting ~30 lines while preserving guidance
141- **Renamed sections**: "Output Structure / Process" → "Report Structure"; "Guidelines" → "Pitfalls & Checks" per best-practice patterns
142- **Standardized labels**: `[ASSUMPTION]` tag added alongside existing `[VERIFY]`; consistent abbreviated references (UCC Art. 2)
143- **Reduced line count**: ~133 lines → ~120 lines, trimming token cost without losing any legal substance
CaseMark