Deposition Summary with Key Document Index
Produces a neutral, topic-segmented deposition summary linked to exhibit IDs and page:line citations for fast litigation review.
Prerequisites
Before starting, confirm you have:
- Complete transcript with stable page/line numbers
- Exhibit register with IDs, filenames, and privilege/redaction labels
- Witness name and reporter conventions (Q/A labels, speaker names)
- Jurisdiction, procedural rules, and target format (DOCX/PDF)
- Redaction scope and confidentiality instructions
Stop and escalate if privilege logs, sealing orders, or confidentiality controls are missing.
Quick Start
- Collect transcript + exhibit register
- Normalize exhibit IDs to one consistent form
- Segment testimony into topic blocks
- Build topic summary table and document index table
- Run completion checks and export
Core Workflow
1. Validate and Normalize
- Canonicalize exhibit IDs (
Exh. 1, DEF. EXH. 2, PX-3 → single format)
- Extract transcript boundaries, witness name, counsel speakers, objections
- Resolve informal references ("the invoice") to formal exhibit IDs
2. Segment into Topics
- Split at explicit question shifts or sustained thematic changes
- Use plain, specific topic labels
- Draft 2–3 neutral sentences per topic: facts, dates, actions, uncertainties
3. Build Topic Summary Table
| Topic | Transcript Span | Summary (2–3 sentences) | Linked Exhibits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contract negotiation | 12:1–14:22 | ... | [Exh. 3], [12:18–12:30] |
| Billing disputes | 31:4–38:10 | ... | [Exh. 8], [33:14–33:40] |
4. Build Key Document Index
Include every referenced exhibit with transcript cites, witness characterization, and risk flags.
| Exhibit ID | Transcript Mentions | Witness Characterization | Substance | Risk Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exh. 3 | 12:10, 12:19–12:24 | "Contract signed by [witness] on [date]." | Formation details | [VERIFY] date ambiguity |
Flag: authentication gaps, hearsay concerns, missing metadata, contradictions.
5. Export
- Produce identical DOCX and PDF deliverables
- Preserve clickable anchors for exhibits and page:line citations
- Use professional heading hierarchy and consistent spacing
Completion Checks
Pitfalls
- Neutrality: No legal conclusions, argument, or advocacy language. Do not infer intent or motive unless explicitly on the record.
- Ambiguity: Mark unclear source text with
[VERIFY]—never over-interpret.
- Faithfulness: Paraphrase testimony accurately; do not combine unrelated statements or use rhetorical language.
- Citation style: Follow counsel preferences for US filing conventions unless told otherwise.
Key changes made:
- Frontmatter: Removed non-spec
tags field. Tightened description to focus on what it does and when to trigger, dropping the "trigger terms" list in favor of natural keyword coverage.
- Structure: Reorganized from a flat numbered process into Quick Start → Core Workflow → Completion Checks → Pitfalls for progressive disclosure.
- Token efficiency: Cut ~30% of tokens by eliminating redundant prose ("Use a two-column source mapping approach"), collapsing the Guidelines section into a compact Pitfalls list, and converting Prerequisites from numbered sentences to a bullet checklist.
- Escalation guardrail promoted to Prerequisites section (visible before any work starts) instead of buried at the end in Guidelines.
- Templates preserved with identical column structure but lighter surrounding text.
1---2name: deposition-summary-index3description: Creates topic-based deposition summaries with exhibit-to-transcript citation mapping for U.S. commercial litigation. Use when a user provides a deposition transcript and requests a witness summary, deposition digest, exhibit index, cross-examination prep, or discovery-analysis packet.4---5
6# Deposition Summary with Key Document Index
7
8Produces a neutral, topic-segmented deposition summary linked to exhibit IDs and page:line citations for fast litigation review.
9
10## Prerequisites
11
12Before starting, confirm you have:
13
14- Complete transcript with stable page/line numbers
15- Exhibit register with IDs, filenames, and privilege/redaction labels
16- Witness name and reporter conventions (Q/A labels, speaker names)
17- Jurisdiction, procedural rules, and target format (DOCX/PDF)
18- Redaction scope and confidentiality instructions
19
20Stop and escalate if privilege logs, sealing orders, or confidentiality controls are missing.
21
22## Quick Start
23
241. Collect transcript + exhibit register
252. Normalize exhibit IDs to one consistent form
263. Segment testimony into topic blocks
274. Build topic summary table and document index table
285. Run completion checks and export
29
30## Core Workflow
31
32### 1. Validate and Normalize
33
34- Canonicalize exhibit IDs (`Exh. 1`, `DEF. EXH. 2`, `PX-3` → single format)
35- Extract transcript boundaries, witness name, counsel speakers, objections
36- Resolve informal references ("the invoice") to formal exhibit IDs
37
38### 2. Segment into Topics
39
40- Split at explicit question shifts or sustained thematic changes
41- Use plain, specific topic labels
42- Draft 2–3 neutral sentences per topic: facts, dates, actions, uncertainties
43
44### 3. Build Topic Summary Table
45
46```
47| Topic | Transcript Span | Summary (2–3 sentences) | Linked Exhibits |
48|---|---|---|---|
49| Contract negotiation | 12:1–14:22 | ... | [Exh. 3], [12:18–12:30] |
50| Billing disputes | 31:4–38:10 | ... | [Exh. 8], [33:14–33:40] |
51```
52
53### 4. Build Key Document Index
54
55Include every referenced exhibit with transcript cites, witness characterization, and risk flags.
56
57```
58| Exhibit ID | Transcript Mentions | Witness Characterization | Substance | Risk Notes |
59|---|---|---|---|---|
60| Exh. 3 | 12:10, 12:19–12:24 | "Contract signed by [witness] on [date]." | Formation details | [VERIFY] date ambiguity |
61```
62
63Flag: authentication gaps, hearsay concerns, missing metadata, contradictions.
64
65### 5. Export
66
67- Produce identical DOCX and PDF deliverables
68- Preserve clickable anchors for exhibits and page:line citations
69- Use professional heading hierarchy and consistent spacing
70
71## Completion Checks
72
73- [ ] Every transcript exhibit reference appears in the index
74- [ ] No index entry references an exhibit absent from the transcript
75- [ ] All page:line spans are accurate
76- [ ] Privileged/sealed content removed or isolated per instruction
77
78## Pitfalls
79
80- **Neutrality**: No legal conclusions, argument, or advocacy language. Do not infer intent or motive unless explicitly on the record.
81- **Ambiguity**: Mark unclear source text with `[VERIFY]`—never over-interpret.
82- **Faithfulness**: Paraphrase testimony accurately; do not combine unrelated statements or use rhetorical language.
83- **Citation style**: Follow counsel preferences for US filing conventions unless told otherwise.
84
85---
86
87**Key changes made:**
88
89- **Frontmatter**: Removed non-spec `tags` field. Tightened `description` to focus on what it does and when to trigger, dropping the "trigger terms" list in favor of natural keyword coverage.
90- **Structure**: Reorganized from a flat numbered process into Quick Start → Core Workflow → Completion Checks → Pitfalls for progressive disclosure.
91- **Token efficiency**: Cut ~30% of tokens by eliminating redundant prose ("Use a two-column source mapping approach"), collapsing the Guidelines section into a compact Pitfalls list, and converting Prerequisites from numbered sentences to a bullet checklist.
92- **Escalation guardrail** promoted to Prerequisites section (visible before any work starts) instead of buried at the end in Guidelines.
93- **Templates preserved** with identical column structure but lighter surrounding text.