Joint Discovery Plan & Proposed Scheduling Order
Produces a court-ready Joint Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order reflecting FRCP 26(f) meet-and-confer results while protecting client interests.
Required Inputs
- Complaint, answer, amended pleadings — all claims, defenses, counterclaims
- Meet-and-confer details — date, participating attorneys
- Court information — court/division, case number, judge, local rules, standing orders
- Initial disclosures — if exchanged
- Existing court orders — CMC minutes, scheduling preferences, model templates
Workflow
1. Analyze Discovery Scope
For each claim/defense, identify:
- Elements requiring proof and key disputed facts
- Document types, custodians, and witness categories
- Proportionality under Rule 26(b)(1): importance of issues, amount in controversy, relative access, party resources
2. Draft Document Sections
| Section |
Contents |
| Caption & Introduction |
Court/division, case number, parties, cite to FRCP 26(f) or state equivalent, meet-and-confer date and counsel |
| Discovery Subjects & Scope |
Claim-by-claim discovery needs tied to legal elements and factual disputes |
| ESI Protocol |
Production formats, metadata, search terms, TAR/predictive coding, preservation |
| Privilege Procedures |
FRE 502(d) clawback, privilege log requirements, timing |
| Discovery Limitations |
Depositions, interrogatories, RFAs, time/geographic/custodian limits |
| Phased Discovery |
If warranted: threshold issues, liability/damages bifurcation, multi-defendant sequencing |
| Proposed Schedule |
All milestone deadlines in tabular format |
| Signature Blocks & Certificate of Service |
All counsel of record with bar numbers, firm, address, phone, email |
3. Set ESI Protocol
- Format: Native for spreadsheets/databases; searchable PDF or TIFF+load files for static documents
- Metadata: Author, recipient, dates created/modified, custodian, plus case-specific fields
- Email: Preserve threading and family relationships
- Search: Exchange proposed terms → validate against samples → refine precision/recall; specify TAR if used
- Preservation: Custodians, data sources (email, drives, cloud, mobile, social), time period, departing employee protocols
- Cost allocation: Burden-shifting for disproportionate costs, backup tapes, forensic imaging
- Deduplication: Global vs. custodian-level
4. Define Privilege Framework
| Element |
Provision |
| Clawback order |
FRE 502(d) — inadvertent production does not waive privilege |
| Clawback procedure |
Written notice with specificity + privilege basis → return/destroy within 5–10 business days |
| Receiving party duty |
Assert within 30 days or before use in deposition/filing |
| Privilege log fields |
Date, author, recipients, document type, subject description |
| Log timing |
30 days after each production (or rolling) |
| Categorical exclusions |
Consider post-litigation counsel-client and pure legal advice communications |
| Common interest/JDA |
Address if applicable |
5. Set Discovery Limitations
| Type |
Presumptive Limit |
Rule |
| Depositions per side |
10 (adjust for complexity) |
Rule 30(a)(2)(A)(i) |
| Deposition duration |
7 hours/deponent |
Rule 30(d)(1) |
| Interrogatories |
25 including subparts |
Rule 33(a)(1) |
| RFAs |
25–50 (stipulate) |
Rule 36 |
| Contention interrogatories |
Deferred until close of fact discovery |
— |
Include format (in-person/remote), location protocols, and cost allocation for reporters/videographers.
6. Build Proposed Schedule
Work backward from anticipated trial date:
| Milestone |
Guideline |
| Join parties |
+90–120 days from order |
| Amend pleadings |
+120–180 days |
| Fact discovery closes |
+9–12 months (moderate complexity) |
| Plaintiff expert reports |
+30–60 days after fact discovery |
| Defendant expert reports |
+60–90 days after plaintiff reports |
| Rebuttal expert reports |
+30–45 days after defendant reports |
| Expert depositions complete |
+30–45 days after final reports |
| Dispositive motions |
+30–45 days after expert discovery |
| Responses |
+21–30 days |
| Replies |
+14–21 days |
| Motions in limine / jury instructions |
–30–45 days before trial |
| Final pretrial conference |
–14–30 days before trial |
| Trial |
~18–24 months from order (moderate) |
Adjust for party count, document volume, expert count, jurisdictional constraints, court availability.
7. Add Modification Provisions
- Fact/expert extensions: by stipulation with court approval if they do not affect dispositive motion or trial dates
- Dispositive/trial changes: court approval, good cause required
- Meet-and-confer required before any modification request
- Optional status conferences at key intervals
8. Assess Phased Discovery
Consider phasing when:
- Jurisdictional or limitations issues are threshold
- Liability and damages are naturally bifurcated
- Multi-defendant cases have distinct factual tracks
- Sampling custodians can inform broader discovery scope
Specify clear phase triggers, transition procedures, and right to modify if phasing proves unworkable.
Pitfalls & Checks
- Cite FRCP 26(f) or state equivalent in introduction; confirm local rule and standing order compliance
- Ground every discovery subject in specific pleading allegations — no generic categories
- Use court-adoptable format ("IT IS HEREBY ORDERED" or separate proposed order)
- Number all paragraphs for easy reference
- Verify all deadlines are internally consistent and comply with local rules
- Check for model plans or templates required by the specific court/judge
- Include certificate of service compliant with applicable rules
- Tone: cooperative where appropriate, protective of client interests where necessary
1---2name: discovery-plan3description: Drafts Joint Discovery Plans and Proposed Scheduling Orders under FRCP 26(f) or state equivalents. Analyzes pleadings, court requirements, and case complexity to produce discovery timelines, ESI protocols, privilege procedures, and scheduling deadlines. Use when preparing Rule 26(f) reports, proposed scheduling orders, case management plans, or discovery frameworks after meet-and-confer.4---5
6# Joint Discovery Plan & Proposed Scheduling Order
7
8Produces a court-ready Joint Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order reflecting FRCP 26(f) meet-and-confer results while protecting client interests.
9
10## Required Inputs
11
121. **Complaint, answer, amended pleadings** — all claims, defenses, counterclaims
132. **Meet-and-confer details** — date, participating attorneys
143. **Court information** — court/division, case number, judge, local rules, standing orders
154. **Initial disclosures** — if exchanged
165. **Existing court orders** — CMC minutes, scheduling preferences, model templates
17
18## Workflow
19
20### 1. Analyze Discovery Scope
21
22For each claim/defense, identify:
23- Elements requiring proof and key disputed facts
24- Document types, custodians, and witness categories
25- Proportionality under Rule 26(b)(1): importance of issues, amount in controversy, relative access, party resources
26
27### 2. Draft Document Sections
28
29| Section | Contents |
30|---|---|
31| Caption & Introduction | Court/division, case number, parties, cite to FRCP 26(f) or state equivalent, meet-and-confer date and counsel |
32| Discovery Subjects & Scope | Claim-by-claim discovery needs tied to legal elements and factual disputes |
33| ESI Protocol | Production formats, metadata, search terms, TAR/predictive coding, preservation |
34| Privilege Procedures | FRE 502(d) clawback, privilege log requirements, timing |
35| Discovery Limitations | Depositions, interrogatories, RFAs, time/geographic/custodian limits |
36| Phased Discovery | If warranted: threshold issues, liability/damages bifurcation, multi-defendant sequencing |
37| Proposed Schedule | All milestone deadlines in tabular format |
38| Signature Blocks & Certificate of Service | All counsel of record with bar numbers, firm, address, phone, email |
39
40### 3. Set ESI Protocol
41
42- **Format**: Native for spreadsheets/databases; searchable PDF or TIFF+load files for static documents
43- **Metadata**: Author, recipient, dates created/modified, custodian, plus case-specific fields
44- **Email**: Preserve threading and family relationships
45- **Search**: Exchange proposed terms → validate against samples → refine precision/recall; specify TAR if used
46- **Preservation**: Custodians, data sources (email, drives, cloud, mobile, social), time period, departing employee protocols
47- **Cost allocation**: Burden-shifting for disproportionate costs, backup tapes, forensic imaging
48- **Deduplication**: Global vs. custodian-level
49
50### 4. Define Privilege Framework
51
52| Element | Provision |
53|---|---|
54| Clawback order | FRE 502(d) — inadvertent production does not waive privilege |
55| Clawback procedure | Written notice with specificity + privilege basis → return/destroy within 5–10 business days |
56| Receiving party duty | Assert within 30 days or before use in deposition/filing |
57| Privilege log fields | Date, author, recipients, document type, subject description |
58| Log timing | 30 days after each production (or rolling) |
59| Categorical exclusions | Consider post-litigation counsel-client and pure legal advice communications |
60| Common interest/JDA | Address if applicable |
61
62### 5. Set Discovery Limitations
63
64| Type | Presumptive Limit | Rule |
65|---|---|---|
66| Depositions per side | 10 (adjust for complexity) | Rule 30(a)(2)(A)(i) |
67| Deposition duration | 7 hours/deponent | Rule 30(d)(1) |
68| Interrogatories | 25 including subparts | Rule 33(a)(1) |
69| RFAs | 25–50 (stipulate) | Rule 36 |
70| Contention interrogatories | Deferred until close of fact discovery | — |
71
72Include format (in-person/remote), location protocols, and cost allocation for reporters/videographers.
73
74### 6. Build Proposed Schedule
75
76Work backward from anticipated trial date:
77
78| Milestone | Guideline |
79|---|---|
80| Join parties | +90–120 days from order |
81| Amend pleadings | +120–180 days |
82| Fact discovery closes | +9–12 months (moderate complexity) |
83| Plaintiff expert reports | +30–60 days after fact discovery |
84| Defendant expert reports | +60–90 days after plaintiff reports |
85| Rebuttal expert reports | +30–45 days after defendant reports |
86| Expert depositions complete | +30–45 days after final reports |
87| Dispositive motions | +30–45 days after expert discovery |
88| Responses | +21–30 days |
89| Replies | +14–21 days |
90| Motions in limine / jury instructions | –30–45 days before trial |
91| Final pretrial conference | –14–30 days before trial |
92| Trial | ~18–24 months from order (moderate) |
93
94Adjust for party count, document volume, expert count, jurisdictional constraints, court availability.
95
96### 7. Add Modification Provisions
97
98- Fact/expert extensions: by stipulation with court approval if they do not affect dispositive motion or trial dates
99- Dispositive/trial changes: court approval, good cause required
100- Meet-and-confer required before any modification request
101- Optional status conferences at key intervals
102
103### 8. Assess Phased Discovery
104
105Consider phasing when:
106- Jurisdictional or limitations issues are threshold
107- Liability and damages are naturally bifurcated
108- Multi-defendant cases have distinct factual tracks
109- Sampling custodians can inform broader discovery scope
110
111Specify clear phase triggers, transition procedures, and right to modify if phasing proves unworkable.
112
113## Pitfalls & Checks
114
115- Cite FRCP 26(f) or state equivalent in introduction; confirm local rule and standing order compliance
116- Ground every discovery subject in specific pleading allegations — no generic categories
117- Use court-adoptable format ("IT IS HEREBY ORDERED" or separate proposed order)
118- Number all paragraphs for easy reference
119- Verify all deadlines are internally consistent and comply with local rules
120- Check for model plans or templates required by the specific court/judge
121- Include certificate of service compliant with applicable rules
122- Tone: cooperative where appropriate, protective of client interests where necessary
CaseMark