Creates trauma surgery documentation with injury severity scoring and damage control principles. Use when documenting trauma operations, calculating ISS, or recording damage control sequences.
Creates trauma surgery documentation with injury severity scoring and damage control principles.
Why This Skill Exists
Trauma is the leading cause of death for Americans under age 45, and trauma surgery documentation faces unique challenges: operations are emergent with no preoperative planning, patients often cannot provide history, injuries are frequently multi-system, and the documentation must simultaneously support clinical care, injury severity scoring (ISS), trauma registry reporting, and medicolegal defense. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) requires Level I and Level II trauma centers to maintain comprehensive trauma registries with standardized injury coding, and verification site reviews specifically examine documentation quality.
Damage control surgery — a staged approach where initial surgery controls hemorrhage and contamination, followed by ICU resuscitation and delayed definitive repair — requires meticulous documentation of each operative phase, the clinical rationale for staging, and the resuscitation endpoints between stages. Poor documentation leads to inaccurate ISS calculation (affecting trauma center verification, research, and benchmarking), coding errors, and medicolegal vulnerability in the high-litigation trauma environment.
Checkpoint A: Pre-Draft Intake (Mandatory)
What was the mechanism of injury (blunt, penetrating, blast, burn, other)? Default: [VERIFY — obtain from trauma team leader]
What were the prehospital vitals and GCS? Default: [VERIFY — obtain from EMS report]
What injuries were identified on primary and secondary survey? Default: [VERIFY]
Was the patient taken directly to the OR or was imaging obtained first? Default: [VERIFY]
Is this a damage control surgery (DCS) or definitive repair? Default: [VERIFY]
What is the patient's hemodynamic status and resuscitation status? Default: [VERIFY]
What blood products have been administered? Default: [VERIFY — from massive transfusion protocol record]
What is the trauma activation level (full, modified, consult)? Default: [VERIFY]
Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS)
Document each injury with its AIS code and severity:
AIS Severity
Description
Examples
1 — Minor
Superficial injury
Skin abrasion, minor contusion
2 — Moderate
Reversible injury, not life-threatening
Simple fracture, small pneumothorax
3 — Serious
Not immediately life-threatening, potential long-term sequelae
Open fracture, major hemothorax, bowel perforation
4 — Severe
Life-threatening, survival probable
Liver laceration Grade III-IV, flail chest with contusion
5 — Critical
Life-threatening, survival uncertain
Aortic injury, massive hepatic disruption, severe TBI
6 — Unsurvivable
Virtually unsurvivable
Decapitation, total body disruption
ISS Calculation
ISS uses the three most severely injured body regions (from six: head/neck, face, chest, abdomen/pelvic contents, extremities/pelvic girdle, external):
ISS = (highest AIS in region 1)² + (highest AIS in region 2)² + (highest AIS in region 3)²
ISS ranges: 1-75 (any single AIS 6 automatically = ISS 75)
ISS ≥16 = major trauma (associated with >10% mortality)
ISS ≥25 = severe trauma (associated with >25% mortality)
Document each injury, its AIS code, the body region, and the calculated ISS. This feeds directly into the trauma registry.
Step 2: Trauma Operative Report — Special Elements
In addition to standard operative report elements, trauma operative reports must include:
Indication Section
Mechanism and time of injury
Prehospital and ED vitals (include lowest SBP and GCS)
FAST exam results (positive/negative, which quadrant)
Imaging findings that prompted surgery (or documentation that patient was too unstable for imaging)
Hemodynamic status at decision to operate (e.g., "Pt remained hypotensive with SBP 70s despite 2 units pRBC; decision made for emergent exploratory laparotomy")
Findings Section (systematic exploration)
For exploratory laparotomy, document a complete systematic survey:
Structure
Finding
AIS Grade
Diaphragm (bilateral)
Intact / laceration with location
—
Liver
Intact / laceration grade (AAST grading)
—
Spleen
Intact / laceration grade (AAST grading)
—
Stomach
Intact / perforation location
—
Duodenum (Kocher maneuver)
Intact / injury
—
Small bowel (run entire length)
Intact / perforation / mesenteric injury
—
Colon (entire length)
Intact / perforation / devascularization
—
Rectum
Intact / injury
—
Kidneys (bilateral)
Intact / contusion / laceration
—
Bladder
Intact / rupture (intra vs. extraperitoneal)
—
Major vessels (aorta, IVC, iliac, mesenteric)
Intact / injury with type
—
Pelvis / retroperitoneum
Hematoma (zone I, II, or III) / expanding vs. stable
—
Document negative findings explicitly ("spleen was inspected and found intact") to confirm the survey was complete.
AAST Organ Injury Scale
Document organ injuries using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading:
Organ
Grade I
Grade II
Grade III
Grade IV
Grade V
Liver
Subcapsular hematoma <10% SA, laceration <1cm depth
Hematoma 10-50% SA, laceration 1-3 cm depth
Hematoma >50% SA, laceration >3 cm depth
Parenchymal disruption 25-75% of lobe
Parenchymal disruption >75% of lobe, juxtahepatic venous injury
Spleen
Subcapsular hematoma <10% SA, laceration <1 cm depth
Pack count documented at each phase (placed and removed)
MTP documented with product totals and ratios
TXA administration documented (timing relative to injury)
Resuscitation endpoints documented between DCS phases
Trauma registry data elements completed
ACS-COT PI filters screened and flagged cases identified
Guidelines
Document the decision to operate and the hemodynamic rationale — "taken to OR because of instability despite resuscitation" is legally stronger than "taken to OR for exploratory laparotomy."
Always document a complete systematic exploration, including negative findings. Failure to document examination of a structure may be interpreted as failure to examine it at all.
Use AAST organ injury grading for all solid and hollow viscus injuries — this is the standardized language for trauma registry coding and inter-institutional comparison.
For DCS, document the lethal triad parameters (temperature, pH/lactate, coagulation) at the time of the DCL decision and at each subsequent phase transition. This demonstrates the clinical rationale for staged surgery.
Count all packs placed during DCL and count all packs removed during re-exploration. Document these counts explicitly — a retained pack is a never event.
TXA must be administered within 3 hours of injury per CRASH-2 evidence. After 3 hours, TXA may increase mortality. Document the time of injury and the time of TXA administration.
Maintain a 1:1:1 ratio (pRBC:FFP:platelets) during massive transfusion per PROPPR trial evidence. Document the actual ratio achieved and any deviations with rationale.
1---2name: documenting-trauma-surgery3description: Creates trauma surgery documentation with injury severity scoring and damage control principles. Use when documenting trauma operations, calculating ISS, or recording damage control sequences.4---56# Documenting Trauma Surgery
78Creates trauma surgery documentation with injury severity scoring and damage control principles.
910## Why This Skill Exists
1112Trauma is the leading cause of death for Americans under age 45, and trauma surgery documentation faces unique challenges: operations are emergent with no preoperative planning, patients often cannot provide history, injuries are frequently multi-system, and the documentation must simultaneously support clinical care, injury severity scoring (ISS), trauma registry reporting, and medicolegal defense. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) requires Level I and Level II trauma centers to maintain comprehensive trauma registries with standardized injury coding, and verification site reviews specifically examine documentation quality.
1314Damage control surgery — a staged approach where initial surgery controls hemorrhage and contamination, followed by ICU resuscitation and delayed definitive repair — requires meticulous documentation of each operative phase, the clinical rationale for staging, and the resuscitation endpoints between stages. Poor documentation leads to inaccurate ISS calculation (affecting trauma center verification, research, and benchmarking), coding errors, and medicolegal vulnerability in the high-litigation trauma environment.
1516---
1718## Checkpoint A: Pre-Draft Intake (Mandatory)
19201. What was the mechanism of injury (blunt, penetrating, blast, burn, other)? **Default: [VERIFY — obtain from trauma team leader]**
212. What were the prehospital vitals and GCS? **Default: [VERIFY — obtain from EMS report]**
223. What injuries were identified on primary and secondary survey? **Default: [VERIFY]**
234. Was the patient taken directly to the OR or was imaging obtained first? **Default: [VERIFY]**
245. Is this a damage control surgery (DCS) or definitive repair? **Default: [VERIFY]**
256. What is the patient's hemodynamic status and resuscitation status? **Default: [VERIFY]**
267. What blood products have been administered? **Default: [VERIFY — from massive transfusion protocol record]**
278. What is the trauma activation level (full, modified, consult)? **Default: [VERIFY]**
2829### Documents to Request
3031- EMS/prehospital report (mechanism, vitals, interventions)
32- Trauma team leader assessment
33- Primary and secondary survey documentation
34- FAST exam results
35- Imaging reports (chest X-ray, pelvic X-ray, CT pan-scan)
36- Massive transfusion protocol records
37- Anesthesia record
38- Prior operative reports (if staged DCS)
39- Trauma registry data collection form
4041---
4243## Step 1: Injury Documentation and AIS/ISS Scoring
4445### Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS)
4647Document each injury with its AIS code and severity:
4849| AIS Severity | Description | Examples |
50|---|---|---|
51| 1 — Minor | Superficial injury | Skin abrasion, minor contusion |
52| 2 — Moderate | Reversible injury, not life-threatening | Simple fracture, small pneumothorax |
53| 3 — Serious | Not immediately life-threatening, potential long-term sequelae | Open fracture, major hemothorax, bowel perforation |
54| 4 — Severe | Life-threatening, survival probable | Liver laceration Grade III-IV, flail chest with contusion |
55| 5 — Critical | Life-threatening, survival uncertain | Aortic injury, massive hepatic disruption, severe TBI |
56| 6 — Unsurvivable | Virtually unsurvivable | Decapitation, total body disruption |
5758### ISS Calculation
5960ISS uses the three most severely injured body regions (from six: head/neck, face, chest, abdomen/pelvic contents, extremities/pelvic girdle, external):
6162```
63ISS = (highest AIS in region 1)² + (highest AIS in region 2)² + (highest AIS in region 3)²
64```
6566**ISS ranges**: 1-75 (any single AIS 6 automatically = ISS 75)
67**ISS ≥16 = major trauma** (associated with >10% mortality)
68**ISS ≥25 = severe trauma** (associated with >25% mortality)
6970Document each injury, its AIS code, the body region, and the calculated ISS. This feeds directly into the trauma registry.
7172---
7374## Step 2: Trauma Operative Report — Special Elements
7576In addition to standard operative report elements, trauma operative reports must include:
7778### Indication Section
79- Mechanism and time of injury
80- Prehospital and ED vitals (include lowest SBP and GCS)
81- FAST exam results (positive/negative, which quadrant)
82- Imaging findings that prompted surgery (or documentation that patient was too unstable for imaging)
83- Hemodynamic status at decision to operate (e.g., "Pt remained hypotensive with SBP 70s despite 2 units pRBC; decision made for emergent exploratory laparotomy")
8485### Findings Section (systematic exploration)
8687For exploratory laparotomy, document a complete systematic survey:
8889| Structure | Finding | AIS Grade |
90|---|---|---|
91| Diaphragm (bilateral) | Intact / laceration with location | — |
92| Liver | Intact / laceration grade (AAST grading) | — |
93| Spleen | Intact / laceration grade (AAST grading) | — |
94| Stomach | Intact / perforation location | — |
95| Duodenum (Kocher maneuver) | Intact / injury | — |
96| Small bowel (run entire length) | Intact / perforation / mesenteric injury | — |
97| Colon (entire length) | Intact / perforation / devascularization | — |
98| Rectum | Intact / injury | — |
99| Kidneys (bilateral) | Intact / contusion / laceration | — |
100| Bladder | Intact / rupture (intra vs. extraperitoneal) | — |
101| Major vessels (aorta, IVC, iliac, mesenteric) | Intact / injury with type | — |
102| Pelvis / retroperitoneum | Hematoma (zone I, II, or III) / expanding vs. stable | — |
103104Document negative findings explicitly ("spleen was inspected and found intact") to confirm the survey was complete.
105106### AAST Organ Injury Scale
107108Document organ injuries using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading:
109110| Organ | Grade I | Grade II | Grade III | Grade IV | Grade V |
111|---|---|---|---|---|---|
112| Liver | Subcapsular hematoma <10% SA, laceration <1cm depth | Hematoma 10-50% SA, laceration 1-3 cm depth | Hematoma >50% SA, laceration >3 cm depth | Parenchymal disruption 25-75% of lobe | Parenchymal disruption >75% of lobe, juxtahepatic venous injury |
113| Spleen | Subcapsular hematoma <10% SA, laceration <1 cm depth | Hematoma 10-50% SA, laceration 1-3 cm depth | Hematoma >50% SA, laceration >3 cm depth | Laceration involving segmental/hilar vessels, devascularization >25% | Shattered spleen, hilar vascular injury devascularizing spleen |
114115---
116117## Step 3: Damage Control Surgery Documentation
118119When a damage control approach is used, document each phase:
120121### Phase 1: Damage Control Laparotomy (DCL)
122123Document the lethal triad status at the time of DCL decision:
124- **Hypothermia**: Core temperature <35°C
125- **Acidosis**: pH <7.2, base deficit >6, lactate >4 mmol/L
126- **Coagulopathy**: INR >1.5, PTT >60s, fibrinogen <100, clinical non-surgical bleeding
127128Document the DCL objectives achieved:
129- [ ] Hemorrhage controlled (method: packing, ligation, shunt, clamp)
130- [ ] Contamination controlled (method: stapled resection, suture repair, drainage)
131- [ ] Temporary abdominal closure (TAC) method (negative pressure dressing, Bogota bag, vacuum-pack)
132- [ ] Time in OR
133- [ ] Blood products administered intraoperatively (pRBC, FFP, platelets, cryo, TXA)
134- [ ] EBL
135- [ ] Packs placed (number, location)
136- [ ] Plan for return to OR (expected timing: 24-72 hours)
137138### Phase 2: ICU Resuscitation
139140Document resuscitation targets between DCS stages:
141- Temperature >36°C
142- pH >7.25, lactate trending down
143- INR <1.5, fibrinogen >150
144- Base deficit improving
145- Hemodynamic stability (off or weaning vasopressors)
146- Urine output >0.5 mL/kg/h
147148### Phase 3: Definitive Surgery (Planned Re-Exploration)
149150Document as a separate operative report:
151- Pack removal (number and condition — any retained packs is a never event)
152- Definitive organ repair or resection
153- Anastomosis creation (or diversion decision with rationale)
154- Definitive abdominal wall closure (or reason for leaving open with closure plan)
155156---
157158## Step 4: Massive Transfusion Protocol Documentation
159160Document MTP activation and products administered:
161162| Time | pRBC | FFP | Platelets | Cryo | Calcium | TXA |
163|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
164| 0-15 min | 4 units | 4 units | 1 apheresis | 10 units | 1g CaCl | 1g bolus |
165| 15-30 min | 4 units | 4 units | — | — | 1g CaCl | — |
166| 30-60 min | 2 units | 2 units | 1 apheresis | — | — | 1g infusion |
167| **Total** | **10** | **10** | **2** | **10** | **2g** | **2g** |
168169Document:
170- Time MTP was activated and by whom
171- Ratio of pRBC:FFP:Platelets (target 1:1:1 per PROPPR trial)
172- TXA administration (must be given within 3 hours of injury per CRASH-2 trial)
173- Serial point-of-care labs (TEG/ROTEM if available, or CBC/INR/fibrinogen Q30min)
174- MTP termination time and reason
175176---
177178## Step 5: Trauma Registry and Quality Reporting
179180Ensure documentation supports:
1811821. **Trauma registry data elements**: Mechanism, prehospital data, ED vitals, injury AIS codes, ISS, procedures, complications, LOS, disposition, mortality
1832. **ACS-COT Performance Improvement (PI) filters**: Cases that trigger mandatory PI review:
184 - Trauma death
185 - ICU stay >3 days
186 - Unplanned return to OR
187 - Missed injury identified after initial evaluation
188 - Transfer to higher level of care
1893. **TQIP (Trauma Quality Improvement Program)**: National benchmarking data — accurate ISS and outcome coding is essential
1904. **State trauma registry reporting**: Required in most states, with specific data fields and submission timelines
191192---
193194## Checkpoint B: Post-Draft Alignment (Mandatory)
1951961. Are all injuries documented with AAST grading and AIS codes for ISS calculation?
1972. Does the operative report include systematic survey documentation (all structures evaluated)?
1983. For DCS cases, are all phases documented separately with resuscitation targets and endpoints?
1994. Is the MTP documented with products, ratios, and timing?
2005. Are trauma registry data elements complete and PI filters identified?
201202---
203204## Quality Audit
205206- [ ] Mechanism of injury documented with time of injury
207- [ ] Prehospital vitals and GCS documented from EMS report
208- [ ] FAST exam results documented
209- [ ] All injuries listed with AAST grading (organ injuries) and AIS codes
210- [ ] ISS calculated and documented
211- [ ] Systematic surgical exploration documented with negative findings
212- [ ] AAST organ injury grades match operative findings
213- [ ] DCS decision rationale documented (lethal triad indicators)
214- [ ] Each DCS phase has a separate operative report
215- [ ] Pack count documented at each phase (placed and removed)
216- [ ] MTP documented with product totals and ratios
217- [ ] TXA administration documented (timing relative to injury)
218- [ ] Resuscitation endpoints documented between DCS phases
219- [ ] Trauma registry data elements completed
220- [ ] ACS-COT PI filters screened and flagged cases identified
221222---
223224## Guidelines
2252261. Document the decision to operate and the hemodynamic rationale — "taken to OR because of instability despite resuscitation" is legally stronger than "taken to OR for exploratory laparotomy."
2272. Always document a complete systematic exploration, including negative findings. Failure to document examination of a structure may be interpreted as failure to examine it at all.
2283. Use AAST organ injury grading for all solid and hollow viscus injuries — this is the standardized language for trauma registry coding and inter-institutional comparison.
2294. For DCS, document the lethal triad parameters (temperature, pH/lactate, coagulation) at the time of the DCL decision and at each subsequent phase transition. This demonstrates the clinical rationale for staged surgery.
2305. Count all packs placed during DCL and count all packs removed during re-exploration. Document these counts explicitly — a retained pack is a never event.
2316. TXA must be administered within 3 hours of injury per CRASH-2 evidence. After 3 hours, TXA may increase mortality. Document the time of injury and the time of TXA administration.
2327. Maintain a 1:1:1 ratio (pRBC:FFP:platelets) during massive transfusion per PROPPR trial evidence. Document the actual ratio achieved and any deviations with rationale.
Run npx skillmds@latest add casemark/documenting-trauma-surgery in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.
Creates trauma surgery documentation with injury severity scoring and damage control principles. Use when documenting trauma operations, calculating ISS, or recording damage control sequences. It is listed under Docs & Writing on SkillMD.
This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Independent scanners report: SkillSpector: PASS, Skill Scanner: PASS. Capability flags: docs only. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.
This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.
Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.
CaseMark (@casemark) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.