CaseMark Structuring Fund Of Funds Vehicles
Designs fund-of-funds structures with layer-on-layer economics, allocation methodology, and portfolio construction guidelines.
When To Use
- Structuring a new fund-of-funds (FoF) vehicle investing across multiple underlying managers or funds
- Evaluating layered fee impact (management fee + carry at both FoF and underlying fund levels)
- Designing allocation methodology for capital deployment across a portfolio of sub-funds
- Analyzing existing FoF structures for economic efficiency, GP/LP alignment, or restructuring
- Building multi-manager or multi-strategy platform vehicles with shared economics
Inputs To Gather
- Vehicle parameters: Target fund size, investor base (institutional vs. HNW), domicile preference (Delaware LP, Cayman, Luxembourg) [VERIFY jurisdiction-specific entity requirements]
- Underlying fund universe: Target number of sub-funds, strategy types (PE, VC, credit, real assets), vintage year diversification goals
- Fee structure at FoF level: Proposed management fee rate, carry percentage, hurdle rate, catch-up provisions
- Underlying fund economics: Typical fee loads of target sub-funds (management fees, carried interest, transaction fees)
- Allocation policy: Concentration limits, diversification targets, commitment pacing schedule, over-commitment ratio
- LP terms: Side letter expectations, MFN provisions, co-investment rights, reporting cadence
- Regulatory constraints: Investment Company Act considerations, ERISA limits, tax pass-through requirements [VERIFY applicable exemptions]
Workflow
Define vehicle structure and domicile
- Select entity type (limited partnership, LLC, offshore feeder) based on investor tax profiles
- Determine whether a master-feeder, parallel fund, or single-entity structure fits the LP base
- Identify need for blocker entities for tax-exempt or non-US investors [VERIFY UBTI/ECI exposure]
- Map out GP entity, management company, and any advisory board governance
Model layered fee economics
- Calculate aggregate fee drag: FoF management fee + weighted-average underlying fund management fees
- Model total carried interest exposure at both layers under base, upside, and downside return scenarios
- Quantify net-to-LP return differential versus direct fund investing (the "cost of diversification")
- Evaluate fee offset or rebate mechanisms — pass-through of underlying fund fee breaks, portfolio company fee offsets
- Test whether FoF-level hurdle rate adequately protects LPs given double-layer carry
Design allocation and commitment methodology
- Set target allocation by strategy, geography, vintage year, and manager size
- Define over-commitment ratio (typically 1.2x–1.5x for PE FoFs) with cash flow modeling to avoid capital calls exceeding available capital
- Establish concentration limits per underlying fund (commonly 10–20% of FoF commitments)
- Build re-up and pacing framework — annual deployment targets, reserves for follow-on commitments
- Specify secondary market and co-investment allocation buckets if applicable
Draft portfolio construction guidelines
- Manager selection criteria: track record length, AUM thresholds, key-person requirements, operational due diligence standards
- Emerging manager allocation carve-out (if any), with distinct underwriting standards
- Liquidity management: cash reserve policy, credit facility sizing for bridging capital calls
- Conflict-of-interest policies for GP affiliates in the underlying portfolio
Structure LP terms and governance
- Define advisory committee composition, consent rights (related-party transactions, allocation policy changes)
- Draft side letter framework: fee discounts for anchor LPs, MFN election mechanics
- Co-investment policy: allocation priority, fee/carry terms on co-invest vehicles
- Reporting obligations: quarterly NAV, annual audited financials, underlying fund look-through reporting
- Key-person and cause events at the FoF GP level — triggers and consequences
Address regulatory and tax structuring
- Confirm Investment Company Act exemption path (Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7)) [VERIFY investor count and qualification]
- Assess ERISA "plan asset" exposure — whether underlying funds' VCOC/REOC exemptions flow through [VERIFY benefit plan investor percentage]
- Structure for tax efficiency: avoid entity-level taxation, manage UBTI for tax-exempt LPs, minimize withholding for non-US investors
- Evaluate state/local tax obligations and filing requirements [VERIFY nexus rules per jurisdiction]
Output
Deliver a FoF Structuring Report containing:
- Structure diagram: Visual map of FoF entity, GP, feeders/blockers, and underlying fund relationships
- Fee waterfall analysis: Side-by-side comparison of gross returns, FoF-level fees, underlying fund fees, and net-to-LP returns across scenarios
- Allocation framework: Target portfolio by strategy/geography/vintage with concentration limits and pacing schedule
- Over-commitment model: Cash flow projections showing commitment capacity versus available capital under stress scenarios
- Term sheet summary: Key FoF-level economic and governance terms in tabular format
- Regulatory checklist: Exemption analysis and compliance requirements with [VERIFY] flags for jurisdiction-dependent items
Quality Checks
- Confirm net-to-LP return projections account for all fee layers including organizational expenses and fund-level transaction costs
- Verify over-commitment model stress-tests accelerated capital calls and delayed distributions simultaneously
- Ensure allocation guidelines are internally consistent (percentages sum correctly, concentration limits don't conflict with minimum diversification targets)
- Check that GP clawback and FoF-level waterfall mechanics align — whole-fund vs. deal-by-deal at each layer
- Validate that regulatory exemption analysis reflects current investor composition, not just target composition [VERIFY]
- Confirm side letter MFN provisions don't inadvertently collapse the fee structure across all LPs
- Flag any underlying fund terms that restrict or condition FoF-level transfer, reporting, or co-investment rights