Debate Adjudication Voting

Independent agents score rubric dimensions with written ballots; synthesis agent explains weighting. Use for high-stakes evaluation. Scope boundary: counterpoint generation → `counterpoint-perspectives`; wine blend → `wine-blending-fusion`.

CatCorner22 Updated

File contents

Debate adjudication multi-agent voting

#27 · Domain: Competitive debate · Category: refinement · Difficulty: 🔴 High

Core principle

Discrete criteria scored separately with ballot justification.

AI problem addressed

Single-pass 'sounds good' evaluation hides tradeoffs.

Implementation

Agent A: logic 1–10 + justification Agent B: evidence 1–10 + justification Agent C: completeness 1–10 + justification Synthesis: final score + which dimension drove decision and why

Boundaries

  • Prototype as prompt scaffold (🟢) before full pipeline middleware (🟡/🔴)
  • Category router: ai-transfer-refinement
  • Catalog: ai-transfer-ecosystem-primer
  • Runtime plugin id: debate_judging

CatCorner22/Cursor_Skills/tree/main/skills/ai-transfer/debate-adjudication-voting commit 6075012c9d

Frequently asked questions

npx skillmds@latest add catcorner22/debate-adjudication-voting