Building Tools

Building Tools

A tool is Celigo's first-class reusable building block. It encapsulates logic -- lookups, imports, transforms, branching -- behind a defined input and output contract. Build it once, use it everywhere: from Flows, APIs, AI Agents, MCP Servers, and other Tools.

Tool Concepts

Why tools exist: Without tools, users build the same lookup-transform-import patterns repeatedly across Flows, APIs, and Agents. Tools solve this by providing a governed, composable abstraction: one definition, many consumers, consistent behavior.

When to build a tool:

• You're building an MCP server -- MCP servers expose tools as endpoints; every piece of logic an MCP server offers must be a tool
• The same logic is needed by 2+ consumers (flows, APIs, agents, MCP servers) -- build once, call everywhere
• You want connection flexibility -- callers can pass different connections to the same tool definition
• You're composing smaller pieces -- tools can call other tools for nested orchestration

When NOT to build a tool:

• The logic is specific to one flow or API and won't be reused -- inline it as a lookup/import processor directly
• You need abstract/instance templating for multi-tenant patterns -- use abstract flows

Tool vs API: the split is how the work gets invoked. An API is reachable from outside Celigo over HTTP (a partner system, a customer-facing app). A tool is reachable only from inside Celigo (flow steps, AI agents, APIs, other tools). If a recipe must be reachable from both, build it as a tool and expose the tool behind an API endpoint -- the tool stays available to inside-Celigo consumers at the same time.

Tool vs flow: tools don't start themselves -- no schedule, no listeners, no flow runtime controls (proceedOnFailure and friends are the consumer's concern), and no abstract/instance layer (a tool is already the unit of reuse; per-environment variation is handled by the consumer-bound connection model). "Every night, do X" or "when a webhook arrives, do Y" is a flow -- the tool may be the thing the flow does.

Architecture:

Tool
+-- input         -- JSON Schema defining what callers send
+-- routers[]     -- processing pipeline
|   +-- branches[]
|       +-- pageProcessors[]  -- lookups (exports), imports, transfers
+-- output        -- schema, mappings, lookups, hooks defining what the tool returns

Routers hold branches, branches hold page processors. Use multiple branches when different inputs need different processing paths. Chain routers via nextRouterId for sequential processing stages. The special nextRouterId: "outputRouter" exits the tool and returns results.

Tool Execution Pipeline

When a tool is invoked:

1. Input received -- input data validated against the tool's JSON Schema (input)
2. Router evaluation -- routeRecordsUsing evaluates branch conditions (if multiple branches exist)
3. Branch selection -- matching branch processes the input
4. Page processors -- each processor executes sequentially (export lookups, import writes)
5. Response mapping -- responseMapping on each processor carries data to the next processor
6. Output mapping -- final output mapped according to the tool's output configuration (schema, mappings, lookups, hooks)
7. Return -- output returned to the caller (flow, API, AI agent, MCP server)

Execution mode depends on the caller:

• Called from a Flow -- runs in flow mode (batch-oriented, run console, error management)
• Called from an API -- runs in API mode (single request/response)
• Called from an AI Agent -- runs with agent context; agent maps connections to the tool
• Called from an MCP Server -- exposed as an MCP tool endpoint for external AI clients
• Called from another Tool -- nested execution within the parent tool's context

Connection model: Always bring-your-own-keys. The caller (flow, API, agent, MCP server) maps connections to the tool at configuration time. MCP Server overrides can swap connections per-server without modifying the tool.

Build order: Connection --> Export + Import --> Tool --> (consumer: Flow / API / Agent / MCP Server)

Concerns beyond the build steps:

• Response mapping -- extract fields from processor responses back into the record. Configured on pageProcessors[] entries within branches, but planned when building the processors. For lookups the response has data[] and errors[] (use data[0].fieldName for single results); for imports use _json.fieldName. Uses Transformation 1.0 syntax (extract/generate pairs)
• postResponseMap hook -- JavaScript processing after response mapping. Also on pageProcessors[] entries, but planned when building the processors

The Two Flavors of Lookup

"Lookup" refers to two different things in a tool. They live in different places and solve different problems:

• Branch page-processor lookups (pageProcessors[].type: "export") -- work-doing lookups inside a router branch that call an external system at runtime ("look up the customer in NetSuite by email"). The data isn't in the tool yet; the export fetches it, and a responseMapping pulls fields from the response onto the record so downstream branches and the output can see them. This is the same lookup primitive flows use -- same export resource, same response mapping, same postResponseMap hook.
• Output static lookup tables (output.lookups[]) -- declarative value-translation tables on the output stage. They reach no external system; they are fixed key/value maps defined inline (e.g. a map translating A to Active, I to Inactive, P to Pending, with a default). An output mappings[] entry references a table by its name (via lookupName) to translate a field value during output assembly.

Rule of thumb: external system, runtime call --> branch page-processor lookup. Translate one value into another via a fixed table --> output static lookup.

Consumer-Bound Connections

A tool never pins connections at design time -- the key difference from flows and APIs:

• A flow or API pins each of its own steps to a specific connection at build time -- the connection IDs are baked into the resource.
• A tool's lookups and imports declare the connections they need, and the consumer supplies the actual connection at bind time -- when the tool is added as a flow step, attached to an AI agent, exposed behind an API endpoint, or embedded in another tool.

The tool definition stays unchanged across every binding. The same tool can be bound with a sandbox NetSuite connection from one consumer and a production NetSuite connection from another, without forking. Mechanically, the tool's page processors reference underlying export and import resources that carry the connection; binding selects which connection records those resources use in that context. Because of this, knowing which connections a tool requires is part of its design -- those connections must already exist in the consumer's account before the tool can be bound and run there.

Quick Reference

Decision Matrix

Minimum Required Fields

Every tool needs at minimum: name, _integrationId, and an input.schema.

Which Schemas to Read

1. Always: request.yml (base fields for create/update)
2. Input config: input.yml (schema, transform, mockInput)
3. Output config: output.yml (mappings, lookups, hooks)
4. Pipeline config: router.yml (routing strategy, branches, page processors, response mapping)
5. Response shape: response.yml

Schema Index

All schemas are in references/schemas/:

• Base fields (create/update): request.yml
• Response shape: response.yml
• Input configuration: input.yml -- schema, transform, mockInput
• Output configuration: output.yml -- mappings, lookups, hooks
• Router and branch configuration: router.yml -- routing strategy, branches, page processors, response mapping

Related Skills

• configuring-exports > Quick Reference -- building lookup exports used as steps in the tool pipeline
• configuring-imports > Quick Reference -- building imports used as action steps in the tool pipeline
• building-flows > How to Build a Flow -- wiring tools into flow pipelines
• building-apis > Quick Reference -- exposing tools via API endpoints
• writing-scripts > Quick Reference -- script hooks on tool page processors
• writing-handlebars > Quick Reference -- dynamic expressions in request bodies, URIs, and field mappings
• configuring-filters > Quick Reference -- input filters on tool steps and router branches

How to Build a Tool

1. Determine the tool's purpose

What should this tool do when called? Define the inputs it expects and the processing steps it needs.

2. Identify the integration

Every tool belongs to an integration. Find or create the integration first.

celigo integrations list

3. Check for existing patterns

Before building from scratch, look at what already exists:

# Search your account (fast, uses local index)
celigo account search "<keyword>"

# Show what an existing tool uses (exports, imports, connections)
celigo account dependencies tool <id>

# Find orphaned resources that could be reused
celigo account lint

# Check if similar tools already exist
celigo tools list

# Search marketplace for pre-built integration templates
celigo templates marketplace

The account index auto-refreshes when stale (>4 hours). Force a fresh snapshot with celigo account snapshot.

Existing tools in the account are the best reference -- they show proven patterns for that specific customer's setup. Marketplace templates may provide a complete pre-built integration you can install rather than building from scratch.

4. Build the connections, exports, and imports

Tools reference exports and imports as page processors in router branches. Build bottom-up: connections first, then exports and imports that use those connections, then the tool that wires them together. See configuring-exports and configuring-imports.

5. Define the input schema

The input schema is a JSON Schema object describing what data the tool accepts. For MCP compatibility, the root schema must have type: "object".

6. Configure routing (if needed)

• No routing -- all inputs processed the same way; skip routers entirely
• Filter-based routing (routeRecordsUsing: "input_filters") -- declarative expression rules on each branch
• Script-based routing (routeRecordsUsing: "script") -- custom JavaScript function returns the branch name

7. Wire page processors into branches

Each branch contains pageProcessors[] -- an ordered list of exports (lookups) and imports (actions). Each processor has:

• type: "export" or "import"
• _exportId or _importId: reference to the resource
• responseMapping: extract fields from the processor response back into the record
• hooks.postResponseMap: optional script for post-processing
• proceedOnFailure: whether to continue if this step fails

8. Configure output

Output mappings transform the processed data into the tool's return value. Supports:

• mappings[] -- extract/generate field pairs (Celigo standard mapping format)
• lookups[] -- static key-value enrichment tables
• hooks.preMap / hooks.postMap -- script hooks before and after mapping

Output mappings and branch response mappings both shape data, but at different times. Branch responseMapping merges a processor's response onto the in-flight record so downstream branches and routers can use it. Output mappings assemble the tool's return value at the very end -- and they only see the final in-flight record, not raw processor responses. If a processor's response field must appear in the output, it needs a response mapping on that processor first.

9. Build the JSON

Reference the Schema Index for the exact fields needed. Use the Which Schemas to Read decision rule to determine which files to consult.

Refactoring Steps into a Tool

A user can ask to factor a contiguous chunk of steps out of an existing flow, API, or tool into a brand-new reusable tool. The parent keeps behaving as before, but the selected steps are replaced by a single tool-step -- a thin wrapper that maps the parent's data into the new tool's input and binds the connections it needs. When the parent is itself a tool, the new resource is a sub-tool and the operation is tool composition -- same mechanics.

This operation is user-driven only. Trigger phrases: "refactor", "factor out", "extract", "turn this into a tool", "make this part reusable", "pull these steps out as their own tool". It is never something to propose unprompted -- reuse decisions belong to the user, and the operation creates real Celigo records and can mutate shared resources.

How it works:

1. The named steps are resolved to a contiguous selection with a single entry and a single exit (a valid tool topology).
2. The new tool's input and output schemas are designed against the real record shapes flowing through that boundary.
3. The wrapper is built for the parent to point at, then the parent is rewritten to remove the selected steps and splice in the new tool-step.

Entry and exit nodes never move. A flow's trigger steps, an API's request/response bookends, and a tool's input/output nodes are stripped from the selection regardless of whether the user included them -- only the body between them becomes the new tool.

No resources are cloned. The new tool's page processors reference the SAME export/import IDs the parent used inline. If those underlying exports/imports are then updated to fit the new tool's input/output shape, the change propagates to every other consumer of those resources (other flows, APIs, tools, MCP servers) -- a platform-wide invariant, not a refactor-specific effect.

Refactoring cannot be undone. There is no programmatic inverse; inlining a tool back into its parent is not supported. If the user regrets a refactor, cleanup is manual: delete the new tool and its wrapper, then restore the parent to its previous configuration. Refactor one parent at a time -- factoring steps from several parents into one shared tool is not a single operation.

CLI Commands

# CRUD
celigo tools list
celigo tools get <id>
celigo tools create < tool.json
celigo tools update <id> < tool.json
celigo tools set <id> key=value [key2=value2 ...]
celigo tools delete <id>

# Manage page processors
celigo tools add-processor <id> <exportOrImportId> [--router <routerId>] [--branch <branchName>] [-y]
celigo tools remove-processor <id> <exportOrImportId> [--router <routerId>] [--branch <branchName>] [-y]

# Test run
celigo tools test-run <id>
celigo tools test-run-step-results <id> <runId> <exportOrImportId>
celigo tools test-run-step-logs <id> <runId> <exportOrImportId>

# Debug (requires debug enabled on the underlying export/import)
celigo tools debug-requests <id> <exportOrImportId> [--since <minutes>]
celigo tools debug-request-detail <id> <exportOrImportId> <key>

# Discovery
celigo account search "<keyword>"
celigo templates marketplace

Pre-Submit Checklist

Required (all tools)

• name is set
• _integrationId references a valid integration
• input.schema is defined with type: "object" at root (required for MCP compatibility)

Pipeline

• All _exportId / _importId references in page processors point to existing resources
• Connections for referenced exports/imports are online
• Router IDs are unique within the tool
• All branches merge back to output node (no dangling branches)
• Last branch in chain uses nextRouterId: "outputRouter" to exit the tool

Cross-resource consistency

• If response mapping needed: configured on pageProcessors[] entries within branches
• If routing used: routeRecordsUsing and branch filters/scripts are configured correctly
• If tool is for MCP: tool name is unique across all tool and API entries in the MCP server

Gotchas

1. PUT erases omitted fields. Always GET first, modify, then PUT. The set command handles this.
2. Router IDs must be unique within the tool. Branch nextRouterId must reference a real router id or the special "outputRouter" terminal value.
3. No dangling branches. All branches must merge back to the output node. A dangling branch causes a configuration error at execution time, even if no record takes that path.
4. Do not include routeRecordsTo or routeRecordsUsing on routers unless needed. If either is present, the API may also require a top-level dataType field, triggering validation errors. Omit both for simple tools -- the API defaults correctly.
5. Tools cannot be deleted while in use. Check "Used by" dependencies first (flows, APIs, agents, MCP servers referencing the tool).
6. add-processor auto-creates a router. If the tool has no routers, the command creates a default router with one branch. Otherwise it targets the first router's first branch by default -- use --router and --branch to target a specific location.
7. Tool names must be unique in the MCP Server. The name field in tools[] on the MCP Server must be unique across all tool AND api entries in that server.
8. Debug logging is on the export/import, not the tool. Use celigo exports enable-debug or celigo imports enable-debug on the resources referenced by page processors, then use celigo tools debug-requests to view the logs scoped to the tool.
9. Test run results may be base64-encoded. The CLI auto-decodes these, but raw API responses need manual decoding.
10. Two different things are called "lookup." A branch page-processor lookup (pageProcessors[].type: "export") calls an external system at runtime; an output static lookup table (output.lookups[]) is a fixed value-translation map that reaches nothing. They live in different parts of the tool and are not interchangeable.
11. Refactoring steps into a tool cannot be undone. There is no programmatic inline-back; cleanup is manual (delete the new tool and its wrapper, then restore the parent). The operation is user-driven only -- never initiate it unprompted, and it can update shared exports/imports that other consumers also use.

Common Errors