Portfolio Monitoring

Portfolio Monitoring

description: Track and analyze portfolio company performance against plan. Ingests monthly/quarterly financial packages (Excel, PDF), extracts KPIs, flags variances to budget, and produces summary dashboards. Use when reviewing portfolio company financials, preparing board materials, or monitoring covenant compliance. Triggers on "review portfolio company", "monthly financials", "how is [company] performing", "covenant check", or "portfolio update".

Workflow

Step 1: Ingest Financial Package

• Accept the user's portfolio company financial package (Excel workbook, PDF, or CSV)
• Extract key financials: Revenue, EBITDA, cash balance, debt outstanding, capex, working capital
• Identify the reporting period and compare to prior period and budget/plan

Step 2: KPI Extraction & Variance Analysis

Key metrics to track (adapt to the company's sector):

Financial KPIs:

• Revenue vs. budget ($ and %)
• EBITDA and EBITDA margin vs. budget
• Cash balance and net debt
• Leverage ratio (Net Debt / LTM EBITDA)
• Interest coverage ratio
• Capex vs. budget
• Free cash flow

Operational KPIs (ask user or infer from data):

• Customer count / revenue per customer
• Employee headcount / revenue per employee
• Backlog / pipeline
• Churn / retention rates

Step 3: Flag & Summarize

• Green: Within 5% of plan
• Yellow: 5-15% below plan — flag for discussion
• Red: >15% below plan or covenant breach risk — immediate attention

Output a concise summary:

1. One-paragraph executive summary ("Company X is tracking [ahead/behind/on] plan...")
2. KPI table with actual vs. budget vs. prior period
3. Red/yellow flags with context
4. Covenant compliance status (if applicable)
5. Questions for management

Step 4: Trend Analysis

If multiple periods are provided:

• Chart key metrics over time (revenue, EBITDA, cash)
• Identify trends — accelerating, decelerating, or stable
• Compare vs. underwriting case

Important Notes

• Always ask for the budget/plan to compare against if not provided
• Don't assume sector-specific KPIs — ask what matters for this company
• If covenant levels aren't known, ask the user for the credit agreement terms
• Output should be board-ready — concise, factual, no fluff

Hermes Profile Notes

This skill was packaged from pi-financial-services source path plugins/vertical-plugins/private-equity/skills/portfolio-monitoring for the Hermes financial-services profile. Use institutional data connectors first when available, cite sources, and stage outputs for qualified human review.

Common Pitfalls

1. Do not present drafts as investment, legal, tax, or accounting advice.
2. Do not use web search as the primary source when an institutional MCP/data connector is available.
3. Do not execute transactions, contact clients, post to a ledger, or approve onboarding. Stage outputs for review.

Verification Checklist

• Inputs, assumptions, dates, and currencies are explicit.
• Numbers tie across tables, models, decks, and memos.
• Sources are cited and institutional data is preferred where available.
• Output is labeled draft / for human review where appropriate.