How do I install the "grad Fama French" skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add charlieviettq/grad-fama-french in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is "grad Fama French" safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with "grad Fama French"?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is "grad Fama French" free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published "grad Fama French"?

charlieviettq (@charlieviettq) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

"grad Fama French" by charlieviettq

Name: "grad Fama French"
Author: charlieviettq

"grad Fama French"

"Apply the Fama-French three-factor model to decompose asset returns into market, size, and value factors. Use this skill when the user needs to explain cross-sectional return differences, evaluate fund performance beyond CAPM alpha, assess small-cap or value tilts in a portfolio, or when they ask 'why do small caps earn more', 'is value premium real', or 'what factors drive returns'.".

charlieviettq Updated Sep 17, 2026

File contents

Fama-French Three-Factor Model

Overview

Fama and French (1993) extended CAPM by adding two factors — size (SMB) and value (HML) — to explain cross-sectional variation in stock returns that CAPM alone cannot capture. The model shows that small-cap and high book-to-market stocks earn systematic premiums.

When to Use

Explaining why CAPM alpha is nonzero for certain portfolios
Evaluating fund manager skill after controlling for factor exposures
Constructing factor-tilted portfolios
Academic research on asset pricing anomalies

When NOT to Use

For fixed income or derivatives pricing (equity-focused factors)
When factor data is unavailable for the market in question
As a complete model — profitability and investment factors may also matter (five-factor)

Assumptions

IRON LAW: Single-factor models (CAPM) underestimate expected returns
for small-cap and value stocks. Size and value represent systematic
risk factors that command their own premia.

Key assumptions:

SMB and HML capture systematic risk, not mispricing
Factor premia are persistent across time periods and markets
Factors are constructed from observable, rebalanced portfolios

Methodology

Step 1 — Obtain Factor Data

Rm-Rf: market excess return
SMB (Small Minus Big): return of small-cap portfolio minus large-cap portfolio
HML (High Minus Low): return of high B/M portfolio minus low B/M portfolio

Step 2 — Run Time-Series Regression

Ri - Rf = ai + bi(Rm-Rf) + si(SMB) + hi(HML) + ei. See references/ for construction details.

Step 3 — Interpret Factor Loadings

bi: market sensitivity (same as CAPM beta)
si: size exposure (positive = small-cap tilt)
hi: value exposure (positive = value tilt, negative = growth tilt)

Step 4 — Evaluate Alpha

If alpha (ai) is statistically insignificant, returns are explained by factor exposures — no manager skill.

Output Format

## Fama-French Analysis: [Fund / Portfolio]

### Regression Results
| Factor | Loading | t-stat | Interpretation |
|--------|---------|--------|----------------|
| Market (Rm-Rf) | x.xx | x.xx | [market exposure] |
| SMB | x.xx | x.xx | [size tilt] |
| HML | x.xx | x.xx | [value tilt] |
| Alpha | x.xx% | x.xx | [skill or luck] |

### R-squared
- Three-factor R2: x% vs CAPM R2: x%

### Conclusions
- [Factor attribution summary]
- [Manager skill assessment]

Gotchas

Factor premia vary across countries and time periods — not guaranteed to persist
HML has weakened post-publication; some attribute this to arbitrage
Five-factor model (2015) adds profitability (RMW) and investment (CMA) — three-factor may be insufficient
Factor construction methodology matters; different breakpoints yield different results
High R-squared does not mean the model is "correct" — it means factors explain variance
Debate persists whether factors represent risk or mispricing

References

Fama, E. & French, K. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56.
Fama, E. & French, K. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1-22.
Fama, E. & French, K. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.

---name: grad-fama-frenchdescription: "Apply the Fama-French three-factor model to decompose asset returns into market, size, and value factors. Use this skill when the user needs to explain cross-sectional return differences, evaluate fund performance beyond CAPM alpha, assess small-cap or value tilts in a portfolio, or when they ask 'why do small caps earn more', 'is value premium real', or 'what factors drive returns'.".---# Fama-French Three-Factor Model## OverviewFama and French (1993) extended CAPM by adding two factors — size (SMB) and value (HML) — to explain cross-sectional variation in stock returns that CAPM alone cannot capture. The model shows that small-cap and high book-to-market stocks earn systematic premiums.## When to Use- Explaining why CAPM alpha is nonzero for certain portfolios- Evaluating fund manager skill after controlling for factor exposures- Constructing factor-tilted portfolios- Academic research on asset pricing anomalies## When NOT to Use- For fixed income or derivatives pricing (equity-focused factors)- When factor data is unavailable for the market in question- As a complete model — profitability and investment factors may also matter (five-factor)## Assumptions```IRON LAW: Single-factor models (CAPM) underestimate expected returnsfor small-cap and value stocks. Size and value represent systematicrisk factors that command their own premia.```Key assumptions:1. SMB and HML capture systematic risk, not mispricing2. Factor premia are persistent across time periods and markets3. Factors are constructed from observable, rebalanced portfolios## Methodology### Step 1 — Obtain Factor Data- Rm-Rf: market excess return- SMB (Small Minus Big): return of small-cap portfolio minus large-cap portfolio- HML (High Minus Low): return of high B/M portfolio minus low B/M portfolio### Step 2 — Run Time-Series RegressionRi - Rf = ai + bi(Rm-Rf) + si(SMB) + hi(HML) + ei. See `references/` for construction details.### Step 3 — Interpret Factor Loadings- bi: market sensitivity (same as CAPM beta)- si: size exposure (positive = small-cap tilt)- hi: value exposure (positive = value tilt, negative = growth tilt)### Step 4 — Evaluate AlphaIf alpha (ai) is statistically insignificant, returns are explained by factor exposures — no manager skill.## Output Format```markdown## Fama-French Analysis: [Fund / Portfolio]### Regression Results| Factor | Loading | t-stat | Interpretation ||--------|---------|--------|----------------|| Market (Rm-Rf) | x.xx | x.xx | [market exposure] || SMB | x.xx | x.xx | [size tilt] || HML | x.xx | x.xx | [value tilt] || Alpha | x.xx% | x.xx | [skill or luck] |### R-squared- Three-factor R2: x% vs CAPM R2: x%### Conclusions- [Factor attribution summary]- [Manager skill assessment]```## Gotchas- Factor premia vary across countries and time periods — not guaranteed to persist- HML has weakened post-publication; some attribute this to arbitrage- Five-factor model (2015) adds profitability (RMW) and investment (CMA) — three-factor may be insufficient- Factor construction methodology matters; different breakpoints yield different results- High R-squared does not mean the model is "correct" — it means factors explain variance- Debate persists whether factors represent risk or mispricing## References- Fama, E. & French, K. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. *Journal of Financial Economics*, 33(1), 3-56.- Fama, E. & French, K. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. *Journal of Financial Economics*, 116(1), 1-22.- Fama, E. & French, K. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. *Journal of Finance*, 47(2), 427-465.

Frequently asked questions