Develop

Develop Skill

This skill covers the Development stage of the AI-DLC workflow: claiming Tasks, writing code, reporting progress, submitting for verification, and managing sessions for sub-agent observability.

Tool namespace: Chorus tools are exposed by the connected MCP server under a chorus__ prefix on OpenClaw (e.g. chorus__chorus_claim_task). Bare names are used below for readability — prepend chorus__ when invoking. See /chorus for the full rule.

Overview

Developer Agents take Tasks created by PM Agents (via /proposal) and turn them into working code. Each task follows:

claim --> in_progress --> report work --> self-check AC --> submit for verify --> reviewer --> Admin /review

For multi-task execution, dispatch one sub-agent per unblocked task with sessions_spawn (whole wave in one message), falling back to sequential waves (the main agent works tasks in dependency order) when sessions_spawn is unavailable or workers fail repeatedly — see Wave-Based Execution below.

Tools

Task Lifecycle:

Work Reporting:

Acceptance Criteria:

Session (sub-agents only — main agent skips these):

Sub-agents: always pass sessionUuid to chorus_update_task and chorus_report_work for attribution. Main agent / Team Lead: call these tools without sessionUuid — no session needed.

Shared tools (checkin, query, comment, search, notifications): see /chorus

Workflow

Step 1: Check In

chorus_checkin()

Review your persona, current assignments, and pending work counts.

Step 1.5: Manage Your Session (Sub-Agents Only)

Skip if you are the main agent.

OpenClaw difference: the Claude Code plugin auto-creates and auto-injects a sub-agent's session via a SubagentStart hook. OpenClaw does not run that hook. Session handling is manual: if you are a sub-agent and the host did not hand you a sessionUuid, create one yourself once at the start, keep it for all task operations, and close it when you finish.

# Create your own session (only if no sessionUuid was provided to you)
chorus_create_session({ name: "<descriptive-worker-name>" })
# -> keep the returned sessionUuid for every task call below

If the OpenClaw host did inject a sessionUuid into your prompt (some hosts forward parent context), reuse it instead of creating a new one. When in doubt, create one — duplicate idle sessions are harmless and auto-go-inactive after 1h.

Step 2: Find Work

chorus_get_available_tasks({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>" })

Or check existing assignments:

chorus_get_my_assignments()

Step 3: Claim a Task

chorus_get_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })  # Review first
chorus_claim_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })

Check: description, acceptance criteria, priority, story points, related proposal/documents.

Step 4: Gather Context

Each task and proposal includes a commentCount field — use it to decide which entities have discussions worth reading.

1. Read the task and identify dependencies:

   chorus_get_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
   

   Pay attention to dependsOn (upstream tasks) and commentCount.

2. Read task comments (contains previous work reports, progress, feedback):

   chorus_get_comments({ targetType: "task", targetUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
   

3. Review upstream dependency tasks — your work likely builds on theirs:

   chorus_get_task({ taskUuid: "<dependency-task-uuid>" })
   chorus_get_comments({ targetType: "task", targetUuid: "<dependency-task-uuid>" })
   

   Look for: files created, API contracts, interfaces, trade-offs.

4. Read the originating proposal for design intent:

   chorus_get_proposal({ proposalUuid: "<proposal-uuid>", section: "documents" })
   

   (chorus_get_proposal defaults to section: "basic" — just metadata + a draft index. Pass section: "documents" for the design docs, or section: "full" for docs + task drafts.)

5. Read project documents (PRD, tech design, ADR):

   chorus_get_documents({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>" })
   

Document update flow (OpenSpec mode): if the originating proposal description contains a line OpenSpec change slug: <slug>, the project's PRD / tech_design / spec Documents are mirrors of files under openspec/changes/<slug>/. To update such a Document (e.g. clarify an AC, fix a spec scenario before resubmitting), load the openspec-aware skill and follow §3.8: edit the local .md file first, then mirror it — prefer chorus mcp call … --arg-file content=<file>, falling back to the chorus-api.sh wrapper with json_encode_file when chorus is not on PATH — with chorus_check_response halting on error. (OpenClaw runs openspec-aware's detection inline — there is no SessionStart hook; see openspec-aware §1.)

⛔ Do not call chorus_pm_update_document directly from the MCP harness with a hand-typed content field in OpenSpec mode. The local file is the source of truth; agent-typed content drifts and burns tokens (openspec-aware §2 Rule 1).

When the LAST task of an OpenSpec idea is verified, run the archive flow yourself (openspec-aware §3.9): run openspec archive <slug> --yes, then mirror each emitted openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md back via §3.8. OpenClaw has no PostToolUse hook to remind you — check after each verify whether the just-verified task was the last of its idea, and if so trigger the archive flow yourself.

Document update flow (spec-lite mode): if the originating proposal description contains a locator line Spec-lite: .chorus/specs/<slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<change-slug>/, the prd / tech_design / … Documents are persistent mirrors of the Chorus-typed docs in that dated change folder. Load the spec-lite skill. Locate the dated folder from the locator line (not by title/type). Edit those <type>.md files in place and update the capability's durable .chorus/specs/<slug>/spec.md in place too — but spec.md is never mirrored (local only, no ids). Tick - [ ] acceptance points, then re-mirror each edited dated-folder file via chorus mcp call chorus_pm_update_document … --arg-file content=.chorus/specs/<slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<change-slug>/<type>.md against its documentUuid (each update auto-increments the Document version = its modification history; chorus-api.sh mcp-tool … fallback when chorus not on PATH), with chorus_check_response halting on error. Git history is the audit trail (git log -- .chorus/specs/<slug>/) — no archive flow, no changelog section. (OpenClaw resolves the spec mode inline; see openspec-aware §1.)

In the no-OpenSpec, no-spec-lite fallback (no locator line, or resolved mode = free-form), edit the Document content directly via the existing MCP tool with no wrapper, no local file step.

Step 5: Start Working

Sub-agent: checkin to the task first:

chorus_session_checkin_task({ sessionUuid: "<session-uuid>", taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })

Then mark as in-progress:

# Sub-agent:
chorus_update_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>", status: "in_progress", sessionUuid: "<session-uuid>" })

# Main agent:
chorus_update_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>", status: "in_progress" })

Dependency enforcement: If this task has unresolved dependencies (dependsOn tasks not in done or closed), the call will be rejected with detailed blocker info. Use chorus_get_unblocked_tasks to find tasks you can start now.

Step 6: Report Progress

Report periodically with chorus_report_work. Include:

• What was completed
• Files created or modified
• Git commits and PRs
• Current status / remaining work
• Blockers or questions

chorus_report_work({
  taskUuid: "<task-uuid>",
  report: "Progress:\n- Created src/services/auth.service.ts\n- Commit: abc1234\n- Remaining: unit tests",
  sessionUuid: "<session-uuid>"
})

Report with status update when complete:

chorus_report_work({
  taskUuid: "<task-uuid>",
  report: "All implementation complete:\n- Files: ...\n- PR: https://github.com/org/repo/pull/42\n- All tests passing",
  status: "to_verify",
  sessionUuid: "<session-uuid>"
})

Step 7: Self-Check Acceptance Criteria

Before submitting, check structured acceptance criteria:

task = chorus_get_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })

# If task.acceptanceCriteriaItems is non-empty:
chorus_report_criteria_self_check({
  taskUuid: "<task-uuid>",
  criteria: [
    { uuid: "<criterion-uuid>", devStatus: "passed", devEvidence: "Unit tests cover this" },
    { uuid: "<criterion-uuid>", devStatus: "passed", devEvidence: "Verified manually" }
  ]
})

For required criteria, keep working until you can self-check as passed. Only use failed for optional criteria that are out of scope.

Step 8: Submit for Verification

Sub-agents — checkout first:

chorus_session_checkout_task({ sessionUuid: "<session-uuid>", taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })

Then submit:

chorus_submit_for_verify({
  taskUuid: "<task-uuid>",
  summary: "Implemented auth feature:\n- Added login/logout endpoints\n- JWT middleware\n- 95% test coverage\n- All AC self-checked (3/3 passed)"
})

to_verify does NOT unblock downstream tasks — only done (after admin verification) does.

Step 8.5: Run the Task Reviewer (inline — no hook on OpenClaw)

OpenClaw difference: the Claude Code plugin relies on a PostToolUse hook to inject a "spawn the reviewer" reminder after chorus_submit_for_verify. OpenClaw has no such hook. Run the reviewer step inline, right here, immediately after submitting. Do not wait for an injected reminder.

Obtain an independent VERDICT before the task is verified:

1. Preferred — spawn a reviewer sub-agent. Use the OpenClaw sessions_spawn tool to spawn a sub-agent whose task tells it to invoke the /task-reviewer skill (bundled with this plugin) against the task, then wait for it (poll the subagents tool or use sessions_yield — do NOT detach; you need the VERDICT before proceeding). The sub-agent inherits the plugin skills, so /task-reviewer is available to it; that skill is read-only (read-only bash for tests/build allowed) and posts a VERDICT: comment on the task. Example task prompt:

   Run the /task-reviewer skill to verify taskUuid <uuid>. Read the task, its AC, the proposal documents, and the code; run the project's tests; verify each AC independently; post your VERDICT comment on the task when done.

2. Fallback — review it yourself. If sessions_spawn is unavailable on your host (spawning disabled by policy), perform the review yourself as a focused, read-only pass following the /task-reviewer skill's procedure: read chorus_get_task, chorus_get_comments, the originating proposal and its documents; read the code that implements each AC (do not trust the developer summary); run the project's test/build commands; verify each acceptance criterion independently. Then record the result yourself via chorus_add_comment ending with a VERDICT: line (PASS / PASS WITH NOTES / FAIL). Do NOT modify project files during this pass — it is review-only (read-only bash for tests/build is fine). Use the same BLOCKER vs NOTE classification the /task-reviewer skill defines.

3. Read the VERDICT and act:

   chorus_get_comments({ targetType: "task", targetUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
   

   Find THIS round's VERDICT: comment — the one posted after your dispatch, not an older round's:

   • VERDICT: PASS — All AC verified, no issues. Proceed to admin verification.
   • VERDICT: PASS WITH NOTES — All AC verified, minor notes. Proceed to admin verification (notes are non-blocking).
   • VERDICT: FAIL — BLOCKERs found. Do NOT verify. Fix the BLOCKERs listed in the reviewer's comment, then resubmit (Step 9).

If no new VERDICT: comment appears after the reviewer returns, check what it did post. A comment reporting that the round limit was reached, or any other explicit refusal to review, is a deliberate escalation to a human: STOP — do not respawn, do not self-review, do not post a VERDICT of your own. If it posted nothing at all, respawn it ONCE, telling it to stay within its turn budget and reserve its last turns for the VERDICT, then apply this same check again to what the retry posts. An explicit refusal from the retry still means STOP; only a second true silence lets you fall back to reviewing manually (Step 8.5 fallback) and post the VERDICT yourself. Absence is never a PASS.

Final code-review gateway (after the Idea's LAST task is verified): when the task you just verified is the last task of its idea-rooted proposal, the feature is about to ship — run the ship-time code-review gateway before declaring the Idea done. Inline (no hook on OpenClaw), same mechanism as Step 8.5: spawn a sub-agent via sessions_spawn whose task tells it to invoke the /code-reviewer skill against the idea (pass the ideaUuid + round number), and wait for it; fallback is a read-only self-review following the /code-reviewer procedure. It reviews the Idea's aggregate code change (cross-task integration, architecture, security, regression, feature-level coverage) and posts one VERDICT: comment on the idea. PASS / PASS WITH NOTES → ship; FAIL → fix via the quick-dev workflow (/quick-dev): chorus_create_tasks with proposalUuid set to the current approved proposal so the fix tasks attach to it (do not reopen old tasks). Group related small BLOCKERs into one cohesive task by default; split only materially large or independently testable fixes. Each fix task must self-check its acceptance criteria and pass independent task review plus admin verification. Re-run the gateway only after every fix task is successfully done; if there is a failed or cancelled fix task, stop and escalate instead. Advisory/behavioral. Run it before any idea-completion report.

Step 9: Handle Review Feedback

If the reviewer returns FAIL, or the task is reopened after verification:

All acceptance criteria are reset to pending when a task is reopened.

1. Check feedback:

   chorus_get_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
   chorus_get_comments({ targetType: "task", targetUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
   

2. Fix every BLOCKER listed in the reviewer's FAIL comment.
3. Checkin again (sub-agent), fix issues, report fixes, resubmit, and re-run the reviewer (Step 8.5).

Step 10: Task Complete

Once Admin verifies (status: done), move to the next available task (back to Step 2).

Step 11: Idea Completion Report (advisory)

If the task you just self-verified was the LAST one of its Idea (every Task across every approved Proposal is now done/closed) and you have document:write, offer to call chorus_create_report. On OpenClaw, ask the user as a plain-text prompt (e.g. "This was the last task of the idea. Want me to write a completion report? Reply yes/no.") — there is no AskUserQuestion primitive. The call requires title (a short report title) plus content; content's parameter description carries the three-section template (## Summary / ## Decisions / ## Follow-ups). Skip on decline.

Session (Sub-Agents Only)

OpenClaw difference: session lifecycle is manual on OpenClaw. The Claude Code plugin automates creation, heartbeat, and cleanup via hooks; OpenClaw does not run those hooks. A sub-agent therefore manages its own session:

1. chorus_create_session({ name }) — once at the start, unless the host already gave you a sessionUuid
2. chorus_session_checkin_task({ sessionUuid, taskUuid }) — before starting work on each task
3. Pass sessionUuid to chorus_update_task and chorus_report_work for attribution
4. chorus_session_checkout_task({ sessionUuid, taskUuid }) — when done with each task
5. chorus_close_session({ sessionUuid }) — when the sub-agent finishes (no hook closes it for you)

To keep a long-running session visible/active, send chorus_session_heartbeat({ sessionUuid }) periodically (any session-touching tool also refreshes it).

Main agent / Team Lead: no session needed — call tools without sessionUuid.

Wave-Based Execution on OpenClaw

OpenClaw difference: there is no team or group object to create. Parallelism, where available, comes from dispatching one sub-agent per unblocked task with OpenClaw's own sessions_spawn tool, issuing the whole wave in a single message — see §"Optional: sub-agent dispatch" below, which also covers the manual session instructions workers need (no SubagentStart hook here). When sessions_spawn is unavailable or workers fail repeatedly, you (the main agent) execute tasks sequentially in dependency order. That is slower but completes the same pipeline.

Sequential wave loop (fallback, always safe)

loop:
  # 1. Find ready tasks (all dependencies done/closed)
  unblocked = chorus_get_unblocked_tasks({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>" })

  if no unblocked tasks and all tasks done/closed:
    break  # All complete

  if no unblocked tasks but some remain (not done):
    break with escalation note  # stuck — likely a failed review blocking the DAG

  # 2. Work each unblocked task yourself, in order:
  for each task in unblocked:
    chorus_claim_task({ taskUuid: task.uuid })
    chorus_update_task({ taskUuid: task.uuid, status: "in_progress" })
    # ... read context, implement, run tests (Steps 4-7) ...
    chorus_report_work({ taskUuid: task.uuid, report: "...", status: "to_verify" })
    chorus_report_criteria_self_check({ taskUuid: task.uuid, criteria: [...] })
    chorus_submit_for_verify({ taskUuid: task.uuid, summary: "..." })
    # Step 8.5: run the task-reviewer inline; act on its VERDICT
    # If you have task:admin, verify the task to "done" (this unblocks dependents)

  # 3. Loop — chorus_get_unblocked_tasks now returns the next wave

Critical: to_verify does NOT resolve dependencies — only done or closed does. A task must be verified to done (by an Admin, or by you if you hold task:admin) before its dependents become unblocked. If you lack task:admin, submit each task for verify and ask the project's admin to verify between waves, then re-run chorus_get_unblocked_tasks.

Parallel form: to run a wave in parallel, dispatch one sub-agent per unblocked task in a single message (sessions_spawn) instead of the serial for loop above, then wait for the wave and verify. Everything else in the loop is unchanged.

Optional: sub-agent dispatch

If your OpenClaw host does support spawning worker sub-agents (sessions_spawn), you may hand each a task — one per unblocked task, all dispatched in one message so the wave runs in parallel. Because there is no SubagentStart hook, the worker prompt must include the manual session instructions explicitly:

Your Chorus task UUID: <task-uuid>
Project UUID: <project-uuid>

Session handling is MANUAL on OpenClaw:
1. chorus_create_session({ name: "<worker-name>" }) -> keep the sessionUuid
2. chorus_session_checkin_task({ sessionUuid, taskUuid })
3. chorus_update_task({ taskUuid, status: "in_progress", sessionUuid })
4. implement, then chorus_report_work({ ..., sessionUuid })
5. chorus_report_criteria_self_check({ taskUuid, criteria: [...] })
6. chorus_session_checkout_task({ sessionUuid, taskUuid })
7. chorus_submit_for_verify({ taskUuid, summary })
8. chorus_close_session({ sessionUuid })

The main agent still owns review + verification between waves.

MCP Access for Sub-Agents

If you dispatch sub-agents, ensure they can reach the Chorus MCP server — the plugin config (and therefore the chorus__* tools) must be available in the sub-agent's environment, and the API key must carry the needed permissions.

Troubleshooting

Work Report Best Practices

Good report (enables session continuity):

Implemented password reset flow:

Files created/modified:
- src/services/auth.service.ts (new)
- src/app/api/auth/reset/route.ts (new)
- tests/auth/reset.test.ts (new)

Git:
- Commit: a1b2c3d "feat: password reset flow"
- PR: https://github.com/org/repo/pull/15

Implementation details:
- POST /api/auth/reset-request: sends email with token
- Token expires after 1 hour, single-use
- Rate limiting: 3 requests/hour/email
- 12 new tests, all passing

Acceptance criteria:
- [x] User can request reset via email
- [x] Reset link expires after 1 hour
- [x] Rate limiting prevents abuse

Bad report: Done.

Tips

• Read task comments first — they contain previous work reports for session continuity
• Check upstream dependencies — read dependsOn tasks and their comments for interfaces/APIs
• Read the originating proposal — understand design rationale and task DAG
• Use commentCount — skip fetching comments on entities with count 0
• Report progress frequently — include file paths, commits, and PRs
• Write detailed submit summaries — Admin needs them to verify
• Always run the reviewer inline after submit (Step 8.5) — OpenClaw has no hook to remind you
• Sessions are manual on OpenClaw — create, checkin/checkout, and close your own session as a sub-agent
• If blocked, add a comment and consider releasing the task
• One task at a time: finish or release before claiming another

When to Release a Task

Release if:

• You can't complete it (missing knowledge, blocked)
• A higher-priority task needs attention
• You won't finish in a reasonable timeframe

chorus_release_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
chorus_add_comment({ targetType: "task", targetUuid: "<task-uuid>", content: "Releasing: reason..." })

Next

• After submitting for verification, an Admin reviews using /review
• Human "Yolo" wake: a yolo_requested wake (the human clicked Yolo on the idea-detail panel) means: drive the WHOLE idea to done via the yolo skill (the full-auto AI-DLC pipeline), not just the execute stage — read the idea's current state and resume from whatever phase it is in. It is stage-adaptive, and it must never merge or push a PR without explicit human approval.
• For platform overview and shared tools, see /chorus