UI Eng Vision Orchestrator

UI Engineering Vision Orchestrator: Meta-Skill Instructions

This meta-skill acts as the central coordinator for modernizing legacy Chrome DevTools views into declarative UI.Widget components based on lit-html, managing a multi-pass sequential CL pipeline to ensure each code modification is small, testable, and highly reviewable.

Refer to ui_engineering.md for general principles.

🛑 Critical Constraints & Forbidden Actions

1. NEVER Break the Build: Code must compile and tests must pass at all steps. If you change a class API or method signature, you MUST update its usage in the same CL to maintain stability.
2. Strict Intermediate Stability: Do not leave the code in a broken state between passes.
3. No Beautification of Adjacent Code: Do NOT fix unrelated typos, formatting issues, or lint warnings in code you aren't actively migrating.
4. No Monolithic Refactors: Do NOT batch Lit conversion and Widget Promotion in the same pass. Keep CLs small and focused.

1. Migration Philosophy & Plan-Validate-Execute Pattern

1. The Plan-Validate-Execute Principle: For each target file, the orchestrator must first generate a structured migration_plan.md listing the exact transformations, file targets, and subskills allocated for each pass.
2. User Acceptance Gate: The orchestrator must halt execution and present the migration plan to the user. No code modification, subskill loading, or CL staging can occur until the user explicitly accepts the plan.
3. No Assumptions on Inheritance: Do not assume the class hierarchy in a file matches older patterns or generic examples. Always perform a structure analysis of the active file first and adapt the plan to the actual, current code.
4. Hybrid Files/Multiple Classes: Files may contain multiple classes in different states of modernization (e.g., one partially migrated class and one fully legacy class). If the file being migrated contains several classes, the migration needs to be done separately for each class, starting with the leaves and going up the dependency chain. Propose modifications only for classes with actual violations.
5. Coupling Analysis: Always check the integration files (e.g., sidebar files, parent panel files) where the target class is instantiated to see if there are any direct .element or .contentElement couplings. If found, include the decoupling of these references in the plan.
6. Neighboring Component Reference: Inspect neighboring modernized files of the same archetype (e.g., DOMStorageItemsView.ts or KeyValueStorageItemsView.ts for storage-like components) to find proven patterns for toolbar and data-grid configurations.
7. The Narrow Bridge Principle: Keep code modifications tightly scoped to a single responsibility per CL. Do not combine technology migrations (e.g., converting imperative DOM to Lit-html) with base class refactoring in the same diff.
8. Strict Intermediate Stability: The code must compile and work correctly, and all tests must pass after each step. You MUST update usages if you change APIs.
9. Establish Comprehensive Guardrails First: Ensure both logic tests (verifying presenter interactions and state updates) and screenshot tests (verifying layout/styling) exist before rewriting code. If coverage is missing, scaffold it first.
10. Pre-flight Clarification: Before starting, verify if the task is underspecified or ambiguous. If so, point this out and ask for clarifications before proceeding.
11. Step Sizing & Complexity Assessment: Assess the complexity of each step beforehand. Aim for intermediate steps that involve changing or adding roughly 300 lines of code. If a step is predicted to be too complex, break it down into smaller substeps. The agent must stop and report back after each step or substep to allow verification.
12. Context Hygiene via Subagents: To keep the main conversation context clean and focused on high-level orchestration, prefer delegating intense execution tasks (like running tests, debugging compilations, or processing independent classes in parallel) to specialized subagents.

2. Multi-Pass Execution Lifecycle

Plan Generation (Gated)

• Actions:
  1. Verify if the task is underspecified or ambiguous. If so, ask for clarifications first.
  2. Scan the target file to determine size, complexity, legacy elements (e.g., ReportView, ToolbarButton, DataGrid, TreeOutline), and actual class inheritance. Deconstruct the file mentally (or in the plan) into Business Logic (state, event handlers) and Rendering Logic (DOM creation, CSS classes). Reference code elements by Name (not line numbers) to ensure the plan remains valid as the codebase evolves. Check if the class dependencies have been migrated to the ui eng vision or not. If the file contains multiple classes, plan the migration separately for each class, starting with the leaves and going up the dependency chain.
  3. Check the files depending on this file, to understand how the code in this file is being used.
  4. Dynamic Ordering Decision: Determine whether to run Logic Consolidation first or Local lit-html rendering first:
     • Option A (Logic First): Choose this if the component has a complex, nested state model or highly coupled event-handlers. Consolidating the state variables and defining the ViewInput interface first provides a clean data contract, making the subsequent template conversion highly deterministic.
     • Option B (Technology First): Choose this if the component has a relatively simple state flow but massive, deeply nested imperative DOM construction. Converting the layout to declarative Lit templates first (using temporary inline or local state) makes it much easier to isolate and group the remaining state updates afterward.
  5. Generate a migration_plan.md using the Structured Plan Template below.
  6. Halt execution and print the formatted plan in Markdown to the chat. Wait for user approval.

📝 Structured Plan Template

The plan you generate MUST follow this structure:

# Migration Plan: [FileName.ts]

## 📊 Current State
- **Hybrid File**: [Yes/No]
- **Classes Found**: [ClassA, ClassB]
- **Strategy Selection**: [Option A (Logic First) | Option B (Tech First)]

## 🛠️ Passes Checklist
- [ ] **Pass 0: Baseline & Safety Scaffolding**
  - Assigned to: `ui-eng-vision-test-scaffolder`
- [ ] **Pass 1: Logic Consolidation**
  - Assigned to: `ui-eng-vision-logic-consolidator`
- [ ] **Pass 2: Lit-HTML Rendering**
  - Assigned to: `ui-eng-vision-local-lit-renderer`
- [ ] **Pass 3: Widget Promotion**
  - Assigned to: `ui-eng-vision-widget-promoter`

Baseline & Safety Scaffolding

• Trigger Condition: User explicitly says "I accept the plan" or equivalent.
• Subskill to Import/Delegate: ui-eng-vision-test-scaffolder (Delegate to a subagent to encapsulate verbose test logs)
• Actions:
  1. Verify existing test coverage. Propose and add missing logic tests for interactions and screenshot tests for visual validation to avoid regressions.
  2. Pay extra attention not to skip this step.

Logic Consolidation

• Trigger Condition: Baseline tests green (or respective previous pass staged).
• Subskill to Import/Delegate: ui-eng-vision-logic-consolidator (Delegate to a subagent to maintain focus)
• Actions:
  1. Extract manual elements, constructor DOM configurations, and imperative updates into private update helper methods with structured state-passing.

Local Lit-HTML Rendering (Technology Migration)

• Trigger Condition: Previous pass staged.
• Subskill to Import/Delegate: ui-eng-vision-local-lit-renderer (Delegate to a subagent for isolated template generation)
• Actions:
  1. Migrate imperative elements to declarative templates (using component mapping rules defined inside the subskill) and render them locally within the existing view.

Widget Promotion (Architectural Bridge)

• Trigger Condition: Both local template rendering and logic consolidation staged.
• Subskill to Import/Delegate: ui-eng-vision-widget-promoter (Delegate to a subagent for final architectural cleanup)
• Actions:
  1. Promote view classes to modern UI.Widget classes, hook up performUpdate() delegates, export the default view layout, and clean up legacy wrappers.