ckorhonen Reflect Skills
The portfolio manager. Where reflect learns from one session, this skill
looks across your recent session history, finds what keeps going wrong, and
treats your installed skills as the fix surface: install one, write one,
sharpen one, or delete one.
Step 1 — Discover and scan session logs
Find recent transcripts with the bundled scanner (resolve scripts/
relative to this skill's directory):
python3 scripts/scan_sessions.py --days 14
It searches the standard local locations when present — Claude Code
(~/.claude/projects/*/) and Codex (~/.codex/sessions,
~/.codex/archived_sessions) — plus any --root you pass, and aggregates
across sessions: tool-error counts, repeated error signatures, and the
noisiest tools. Treat its output as a map; open specific transcripts only
to confirm a pattern, and never copy raw transcript text, secrets, or
personal message content into any durable file.
Privacy rule: session logs are sensitive. Read locally, summarize patterns, discard specifics.
Step 2 — Cluster into failure patterns
Group what the scan surfaces into named patterns with counts, e.g.:
- "Agent hand-rolls PDF text extraction, fails, retries — 4 sessions"
- "Same 3-step deploy sequence reconstructed from scratch — 6 sessions"
- "Skill X never fired despite 5 sessions doing exactly its job"
- "Skill Y fired on unrelated requests twice and derailed the turn"
A pattern needs at least 2–3 independent sightings; single incidents go
back to reflect's observation ledger, not here.
Step 3 — Resolve each pattern via the portfolio
For each pattern, pick the cheapest fix that addresses it, in this order:
Fix an existing local skill. Under-triggering is usually a vague description — rewrite it with exact symptoms, error messages, and "use when" conditions. Over-triggering usually needs "do not use for..." exclusions.
Install an ecosystem skill. Search before authoring:
npx skills find <pattern keywords>If a well-maintained skill matches, propose installing it (
npx skills add <owner/repo@skill>) rather than writing a duplicate. Prefer skills whose scope matches the pattern narrowly.Create a new skill. When the pattern is real, recurring, and nothing exists: author it following the ecosystem format (directory +
SKILL.md, symptom-rich description). House it in the project for project patterns, user-level for cross-project ones.Remove or merge. A skill that repeatedly misfires, duplicates another, or addresses a tool that no longer exists is context cost with no return. Propose removal with the evidence; delete only on approval.
If the fix is a rule, command, or script rather than a skill, hand the
finding to the reflect taxonomy instead of forcing it into this lane.
Step 4 — Record and report
Log outcomes to .reflect/applied.md (project-level fixes) or
~/.reflect/applied.md (user-level), same ledger format as reflect.
Installs and removals are always proposed unless the user pre-approved
portfolio changes for the run.
## Skill Portfolio Review
Scanned: n sessions over n days (n Claude Code, n Codex)
**Patterns found** (with sightings)
| Pattern | Sessions | Resolution | Status |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
**Portfolio changes** — modified n, created n, install-proposed n,
removal-proposed n
**Healthy** — patterns checked with no action needed
Boundaries
- Installing and removing skills changes what runs on every future session: propose with evidence, apply on approval.
- Modifying descriptions of skills you (the reflect family) previously created is fair game; modifying hand-written or third-party skills is propose-only.
- Never send transcript content anywhere external — ecosystem search queries are keywords, not log excerpts.