Incident Commander Playbook
Incident: {{ incident_title }} Severity: {{ severity }} | IC: {{ ic_name }}
IC Core Responsibilities
The Incident Commander is the single decision-maker during an incident. The IC does NOT debug — the IC coordinates.
- Own the incident — you are the single point of authority
- Communicate — keep all stakeholders informed at regular intervals
- Delegate — assign roles and tasks, do not do the debugging yourself
- Decide — make escalation, rollback, and communication decisions
- Document — ensure the timeline is being captured
Role Assignments
Upon assuming IC, assign these roles immediately:
| Role | Responsibility | Assigned To |
|---|---|---|
| Incident Commander | Coordination, decisions, communication | {{ ic_name }} |
| Tech Lead | Technical investigation and mitigation | assign |
| Communications Lead | Customer/stakeholder updates | assign |
| Scribe | Timeline documentation | assign |
Phase 1 — Declaration (0-5 min)
- Confirm incident is real (not false alarm)
- Assign severity: {{ severity }}
- Open incident channel in Slack
- Post initial situation summary
- Assign Tech Lead, Comms Lead, Scribe
- Start incident timer
Initial Announcement Template:
INCIDENT DECLARED: {{ incident_title }}
Severity: {{ severity }}
IC: {{ ic_name }}
Status: Investigating
Impact: [describe user impact]
Bridge: [link to call/channel]
Next update in: 15 minutes
Phase 2 — Investigation (5-30 min)
- Tech Lead reports initial findings
- Identify blast radius (which services, which users)
- Check recent deployments, config changes, and dependency status
- Determine if rollback is viable
- Decide: mitigate vs. fix-forward vs. rollback
Communication Cadence:
| Severity | Update Frequency | Stakeholder Notification |
|---|---|---|
| SEV1 | Every 15 minutes | Exec team, all engineering |
| SEV2 | Every 30 minutes | Engineering leadership |
| SEV3 | Every 60 minutes | Team leads |
Phase 3 — Mitigation (30 min+)
- Mitigation action identified and approved by IC
- Communicate mitigation plan before executing
- Execute mitigation (rollback, scaling, failover, hotfix)
- Verify mitigation effectiveness with monitoring
- Update status page and stakeholders
Escalation Decision Framework:
Escalate severity if ANY of these are true:
- Mitigation attempt failed
- Blast radius is expanding
- Impact duration exceeds MTTR target for current severity
- Customer-reported impact increasing
- Root cause unknown after 30 minutes (SEV1) or 60 minutes (SEV2)
Phase 4 — Resolution
- Confirm service restored to normal operation
- Monitoring shows metrics returned to baseline
- Update status page to "Resolved"
- Post final update to incident channel
- Schedule post-incident review within 48 hours
- Thank the response team
Resolution Announcement Template:
INCIDENT RESOLVED: {{ incident_title }}
Duration: [total time]
Impact: [summary of user impact]
Root cause: [brief description]
Mitigation: [what was done]
Post-incident review: [scheduled date/time]
Phase 5 — Handoff (if IC rotation needed)
- Brief incoming IC on current status, timeline, and open actions
- Introduce incoming IC to the bridge/channel
- Transfer all role assignments
- Outgoing IC remains available for questions for 30 minutes
IC Anti-Patterns to Avoid
- Do NOT debug — delegate to Tech Lead
- Do NOT go silent — communicate even when there is no new information
- Do NOT skip updates — stakeholders assume the worst in silence
- Do NOT make unilateral changes — announce actions before executing
- Do NOT let the incident run without a timer — track duration actively
Counter-Rationalizations
| Shortcut | Counter | Why |
|---|---|---|
| "We can skip some steps for this case" | Adapt the workflow steps, don't skip them | Skipped steps are where incidents and oversights originate |
| "The user seems to already know what to do" | Complete all workflow phases with the user | The workflow catches blind spots that experience alone misses |
| "This is a minor case, full process is overkill" | Scale the process down, don't turn it off | Minor cases become major when unstructured; the process scales, not disappears |
| "I'll fill in the details later" | Complete each section before moving on | Deferred details are forgotten; real-time capture is more accurate |
| "The template output isn't necessary" | Always produce the structured output format | Structured output enables comparison, audit trails, and handoff to other teams |