IT Change Management Process
Change: {{ change_title }} Type: {{ change_type }} | Requested by: {{ requested_by }} Target Date: {{ target_date }} | Affected: {{ affected_services }}
Change Type Definitions
| Type | Description | Approval Required | Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Pre-approved, low-risk, routine | Pre-approved (no CAB) | 24 hours |
| Normal | Requires assessment and approval | CAB approval | 5 business days |
| Emergency | Critical fix, cannot wait for CAB | Emergency CAB (expedited) | ASAP |
Step 1 — Change Request Submission
- Complete change request form:
- Title: {{ change_title }}
- Description: detailed technical scope
- Business justification
- Affected services: {{ affected_services }}
- Requested implementation date: {{ target_date }}
- Expected duration
- Requestor: {{ requested_by }}
Step 2 — Risk Assessment
Impact & Risk Matrix
RISK ASSESSMENT
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Impact:
[ ] Low — Single user/non-critical system
[ ] Medium — Department or non-critical service
[ ] High — Organization-wide or business-critical service
[ ] Critical — Revenue-impacting or security-related
Probability of Failure:
[ ] Low — Routine, well-tested, done many times
[ ] Medium — Some complexity, tested but not routine
[ ] High — Complex, first-time, multiple dependencies
Risk Level = Impact x Probability:
[ ] Low Risk → Standard approval
[ ] Medium Risk → Manager + CAB approval
[ ] High Risk → CAB + Director approval
[ ] Critical Risk → CAB + VP/CTO approval
Pre-Implementation Checklist
- Change tested in non-production environment
- Rollback plan documented and tested
- Backup of affected systems completed or scheduled
- Communication plan prepared for affected users
- Maintenance window scheduled ({{ target_date }})
- On-call resources identified for implementation
Step 3 — Approval
Standard Change
- Verify change matches pre-approved standard change template
- Technical lead approval
- Proceed to implementation
Normal Change
- Technical review completed by peer
- Manager approval
- Submit to CAB for review
- CAB meeting date: ______
- CAB decision: [ ] Approved / [ ] Rejected / [ ] Deferred
- If rejected: document reason and required modifications
Emergency Change
- Emergency CAB (minimum: change manager + service owner)
- Verbal approval documented
- Formal documentation completed within 24 hours post-implementation
Step 4 — Implementation Plan
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Date/Time: {{ target_date }}
Duration: [estimated duration]
Implementer: {{ requested_by }}
Approver: [name]
PRE-IMPLEMENTATION:
[ ] Notify stakeholders
[ ] Verify backups completed
[ ] Confirm rollback plan ready
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS:
1. [Step 1 with expected duration]
2. [Step 2 with expected duration]
3. [Step 3 with expected duration]
VERIFICATION:
[ ] [Test 1 — expected result]
[ ] [Test 2 — expected result]
[ ] [Test 3 — expected result]
ROLLBACK TRIGGER:
If any verification fails or [specific condition],
execute rollback plan immediately.
ROLLBACK PLAN:
1. [Rollback step 1]
2. [Rollback step 2]
3. [Verify rollback successful]
Step 5 — Post-Implementation Review
- All verification tests passed
- No unexpected errors or degradation observed
- Monitor for 30 minutes (standard) / 2 hours (high risk) post-change
- Update CMDB if configuration items changed
- Notify stakeholders of successful completion
- If issues detected:
- Determine if rollback is needed
- Document issues and resolution
- Close change request in ITSM
- Record actual vs planned duration
- Document lessons learned (for non-standard changes)
Counter-Rationalizations
| Shortcut | Counter | Why |
|---|---|---|
| "We can skip some steps for this case" | Adapt the workflow steps, don't skip them | Skipped steps are where incidents and oversights originate |
| "The user seems to already know what to do" | Complete all workflow phases with the user | The workflow catches blind spots that experience alone misses |
| "This is a minor case, full process is overkill" | Scale the process down, don't turn it off | Minor cases become major when unstructured; the process scales, not disappears |
| "I'll fill in the details later" | Complete each section before moving on | Deferred details are forgotten; real-time capture is more accurate |
| "The template output isn't necessary" | Always produce the structured output format | Structured output enables comparison, audit trails, and handoff to other teams |
Output Format
Generate a change management report with:
- Change summary (title, type, risk level)
- Approval chain with timestamps
- Implementation result (success/rollback)
- Post-implementation status and observations