Business Logic Entry Point Domain Entity Payload Types

Domain Entity Payload Types for Business Logic Entry Points

Goal

When a business-logic entry point returns domain-entity data, the payload type must be the domain-entity type itself.

Do not transform or map a domain entity into another return payload type at the business-logic entry point. If the payload is meant to carry a Customer, return Customer. If it is meant to carry several Order entities, return a collection of Order. Keep the domain-entity type intact.

This rule applies to the payload type, not merely to the runtime value. The return signature must expose the domain-entity type directly.

What Counts as In Scope

Apply this skill to code that does one or more of these things:

• defines the success payload of a business-logic entry point
• defines a ...QueryHandlerSuccess or ...CommandHandlerSuccess type that carries domain-entity data
• maps domain entities into intermediate payload types at business-logic boundaries
• returns one or more domain entities from business logic
• introduces DTO, view-model, projection, response-model, or similar wrapper types where the payload is supposed to contain domain-entity data

Domain Entity Payload Rule

1. Use the domain-entity type directly whenever the payload contains domain-entity data.

   • Return Customer, not CustomerPayload.
   • Return Order, not OrderDto.
   • Return List<Order> or Order[], not OrderListItem[], when the payload is meant to contain domain entities.

2. Do not map domain entities into alternate payload types at business-logic entry points.

   • Do not introduce conversion layers whose only purpose is to reshape domain-entity data before returning it from business logic.
   • Keep entity-to-payload mapping out of the business-logic entry point when the intended payload is the entity itself.

3. Keep wrapper success types aligned with the entity rule.

   • If a ...QueryHandlerSuccess or ...CommandHandlerSuccess type contains domain-entity data, its relevant fields must use the domain-entity type directly.
   • Use collections, optionals, or other container types around the domain-entity type only when the business result truly requires that shape.

4. Preserve other entry-point rules.

   • If another rule requires a non-create command handler to return the project's empty equivalent, keep that rule.
   • If another rule allows a create command handler to return only created IDs, keep that rule.
   • Apply this skill only in the cases where the entry point is supposed to return domain-entity data.

Detection Workflow

1. Identify whether the payload is meant to contain domain-entity data.

   • Check the business meaning of the returned value.
   • Determine whether the caller is receiving actual entities from the domain layer rather than identifiers or non-entity summaries.

2. Inspect the declared return types.

   • Look for payload wrappers, DTOs, response models, projections, or other types inserted between the business-logic entry point and the domain entity.
   • Check whether those types merely duplicate the entity shape or rename fields without changing the business meaning.

3. Trace mapping code.

   • Look for toDto, toPayload, toResponse, fromEntity, or similar conversions at the business-logic entry point.
   • Treat entity-to-payload mapping at that boundary as a violation when the payload is intended to contain domain-entity data.

Writing or Changing Business-Logic Payloads

1. Start from the business result.

   • Decide whether the entry point is supposed to return domain entities, entity IDs, or some other business result.
   • Apply this skill only when the result should contain domain-entity data.

2. Use the entity type directly in the return signature.

   • If one entity is returned, use the entity type directly.
   • If several entities are returned, use a collection of that entity type.
   • If the payload is wrapped in a success type, put the entity type directly inside that wrapper.

3. Remove redundant mapping.

   • Delete or avoid payload types that only mirror the entity shape for the business-logic boundary.
   • Delete or avoid conversion code that only repackages the entity without changing the intended business result.

4. Keep the domain meaning intact.

   • Preserve the entity's type, identity, and behavior contract as represented by the domain layer.
   • Do not flatten or rename entity fields merely to satisfy a business-logic return payload shape.

Examples

Use this:

type FindCustomerByIdQueryHandlerSuccess = {
  customer: Customer
}

Not this:

type CustomerPayload = {
  id: CustomerId
  name: string
}

type FindCustomerByIdQueryHandlerSuccess = {
  customer: CustomerPayload
}

Use this:

type ListOrdersQueryHandlerSuccess = {
  orders: Order[]
}

Not this:

type OrderListItem = {
  id: OrderId
  total: Money
}

type ListOrdersQueryHandlerSuccess = {
  orders: OrderListItem[]
}

Review Questions

When reading or reviewing code, ask:

• Is this entry point supposed to return domain-entity data?
• If so, does the payload type use the domain-entity type directly?
• Is there any DTO, payload type, response model, or mapping layer inserted without changing the intended business result?
• Would removing the mapping leave the business meaning unchanged?
• Does this code violate another entry-point rule, such as returning only IDs for create commands?

If the answer is yes, apply this skill.

Report the Outcome

When finishing the task:

• state which business-logic entry points were identified or changed
• state which payload fields now use domain-entity types directly
• state which redundant payload types or mappings were removed or avoided
• state any other entry-point rule that still constrained the final return shape