Nightly Code Complexity Reduction
The caller provides pre-computed context:
- Package manager (
npm,yarn, orbun) - Current thresholds (cognitiveComplexity, maxLinesPerFunction from eslint.thresholds.json)
- Proposed thresholds (each metric decreased toward target minimums)
- Metrics being reduced (which metrics are above target)
Instructions
Update eslint.thresholds.json with the proposed new threshold values (do NOT change the maxLines threshold)
Run the project's lint script with the provided package manager (e.g.,
npm run lint,yarn lint, orbun run lint) to find functions that violate the new stricter thresholdsBefore editing, check each violating file's total line count (
wc -l). If a file is within 20 lines of itsmax-linesESLint limit (typically 300), extract helpers into a separate companion file (e.g.,fooHelpers.ts) instead of adding them to the same file. Extracting functions into the same file adds net lines and can create new max-lines violations.Fix violations one file at a time. Read only the specific function that violates — do not pre-read all files upfront. Fix it, then move to the next.
For cognitive complexity violations: use early returns, extract helper functions, replace conditionals with lookup tables
For max-lines-per-function violations: split large functions, extract helper functions, separate concerns
After each file edit, run the project's formatter with the provided package manager (e.g.,
npm run format,yarn format, orbun run format) to ensure line counts reflect the final formatted state before moving on. Do not reach for a barenpx prettier: when the binary is absentnpxsilently installs and executes whatever the registry currently publishes under that name, which is an unpinned dependency introduced by a formatting step. If the project has no format script, run the lockfile-pinned binary directly (./node_modules/.bin/prettier --write <file>)Re-run the lint script with the provided package manager to verify all violations are resolved (both the target metric AND max-lines)
Run the project's typecheck script with the provided package manager to catch type errors early — same reasoning as step 7, so
npm run typecheck/yarn typecheck/bun run typecheck, falling back to./node_modules/.bin/tsc --noEmitrather thannpx tsc:case "$PACKAGE_MANAGER" in npm) runner=(npm run) ;; yarn) runner=(yarn) ;; bun) runner=(bun run) ;; *) echo "unsupported package manager: $PACKAGE_MANAGER" >&2; exit 2 ;; esac status=0 "${runner[@]}" typecheck >tsc.log 2>&1 || status=$? head -n 30 tsc.log; echo "exit=$status"Capture the status before the pipe — a pipeline reports its LAST stage's exit code, and
headalways succeeds, sotsc --noEmit | head -30reads as clean however many errors it printed (falsifiable-checks, pager-shadowed status).|| status=$?rather than; status=$?: underset -ethe;form exits before the assignment, so the failure is never reported at all. If there are type errors, fix them now — do NOT wait until the commit step. Pre-commit hooks run type checking, and discovering errors at commit time wastes turns.Run the project's test script with the provided package manager (e.g.,
npm run test,yarn test, orbun run test) to verify no tests are broken by the refactoringCommit all changes (refactored code + updated eslint.thresholds.json) with conventional commit messages
Create a PR with
gh pr createwith a title like "refactor: reduce code complexity: [metrics being reduced]" summarizing the changes