Lisa Product Walkthrough

Live Product Walkthrough

Reading a PRD or a mock without seeing the current product produces tickets that misjudge the change. This skill defines how to evaluate the live product before planning tickets, so the work is grounded in what actually exists today.

How you drive the product is owned by the use-the-product core skill — it detects the product type (web / API / game / CLI / IaC), resolves the target environment and its mutation policy from .lisa.config.json, and discovers the project's personas. A walkthrough is read-leaning: prefer the policy's read-only actions, and only mutate when both the policy allows it (full) and a flow genuinely can't be understood without it. This skill adds the planning lens below.

When to invoke

Always run a walkthrough when the work touches user-facing surfaces:

• The PRD describes a change to an existing screen, flow, or interaction
• The PRD adds something next to existing functionality (entry points, navigation, related surfaces)
• A mock or prototype implies a re-style or re-flow of something currently shipped
• The change is a "bug" framed as a fix to current behavior — you must see the current behavior before reasoning about the fix

Skip when the work is purely internal (type-only, doc-only) or affects a surface that does not yet exist in production / dev.

1. Plan the walkthrough

Before driving anything, list the surfaces the change will touch:

• Which screens/routes/endpoints are involved (current and new)?
• Which user roles need to be exercised (admin / customer / etc.)?
• Which states matter (signed-out, signed-in, empty, populated, error, loading)?
• For a DOM web app, which viewports matter (desktop always; mobile when responsive)?

Write this list down. If you can't, the PRD is too vague — note it as a coverage smell and surface it as an Open Question on the resulting ticket.

2. Drive the current product

Invoke use-the-product to detect the type, resolve the environment + mutation policy, and discover personas — then drive the surfaces from step 1 through its per-type playbook (browser for DOM, curl for an API, canvas+input for a game, cdk synth/diff for IaC). Capture evidence as you go: for a DOM app, a browser_snapshot (accessibility tree — best for reasoning) and a browser_take_screenshot (visual) per surface and per state, plus browser_console_messages / browser_network_requests after interactions; for an API, representative request/response pairs; for a game, screenshots of each state. If the project defines personas, walk the surfaces as the relevant archetype(s).

When the resolved DOM environment is non-production with mutation policy full and the configured Kane provider passes lisa kane probe, use-the-product may delegate the bounded journey to lisa-kane-browser. Extract its screenshot, HAR/network, console, and result artifacts into the normal Current Product evidence. Never use the expiring Test Manager link as the only evidence. A walkthrough that resolves read-only stays on a directly controlled browser backend during the initial Kane rollout.

Honor the mutation gate: on a read-only env, observe without submitting; never walk a forbidden env (production defaults to forbidden). Treat console errors, 4xx/5xx, and unexpected calls as findings.

3. Record findings

For every walkthrough, record:

• What exists today: a short prose description of the current flow, the components/endpoints in use (identify them from the snapshot/routes where you can), and the states observed.
• What the PRD changes: explicit delta — added / removed / modified surfaces, new/removed states.
• Existing-component reuse candidates: components or endpoints in the current product that could absorb the new behavior (see lisa-tracker-source-artifacts §7).
• Design-vs-current-product divergence: where the mock/prototype materially diverges from what's shipped. Each divergence is a discussion item, not an automatic rebuild (see lisa-tracker-source-artifacts §3).
• Coverage smells: states the PRD doesn't address that exist today (e.g. the mock shows the empty state but ignores the populated state 90% of users see).
• Behavioral surprises: anything that doesn't match the PRD's assumptions about current behavior — usually the most valuable findings, because they invalidate parts of the PRD.

4. Attach evidence and close

Capture evidence so the originating ticket / Notion comment / PRD review can reference it. Close the session when done (browser_close for a browser) — walkthroughs are short, focused, and one-shot.

• For PRD intake: include a "Current Product" comment on the Notion PRD with the findings prose and inline screenshots alongside each affected surface.
• For ticket creation: include the findings under ## Current Product in the ticket description (Story or Epic). Reference screenshots as remote links or attachments.
• For change-impact analysis: produce a short report; the consuming skill decides where it lands.

Findings format

Use this structure when emitting walkthrough findings, so consuming skills can splice them into tickets / comments unchanged. The ## Current Product heading matches what lisa-jira-write-ticket Phase 4e expects to inherit — keep the heading exact.

## Current Product

**Environment**: <target> as <account/role> (<mutation level>)
**Explored as**: <persona(s) or "generic representative user">
**Viewports exercised**: Desktop 1512×768, Mobile 375×812   (DOM web only)

### Surfaces walked
1. <route/endpoint/screen> — <one-line current behavior>
2. <route/endpoint/screen> — <one-line current behavior>

### What exists today
<2-4 sentence prose summary of the current flow and components/endpoints in use>

### Delta vs. PRD
- ADDED: <new surface/state from PRD>
- MODIFIED: <existing surface, with the change>
- REMOVED: <existing surface PRD removes>
- UNCHANGED-BUT-IMPACTED: <existing surface PRD doesn't mention but will be affected>

### Existing-component reuse candidates
- <component / endpoint / screen> — could absorb <new behavior>

### Design-vs-current-product divergence
- <mock or prototype reference> diverges from <current surface> in: <specific dimension>
- Recommendation: <reuse / new build / discussion>

### Coverage smells & behavioral surprises
- <smell or surprise>

### Evidence
- <list of screenshots/snapshots/request-response pairs, with captions>

Rules

• Walk before you write. If the work touches existing user-facing surfaces and the walkthrough wasn't done, the resulting ticket is missing context — don't ship it.
• Never walk a forbidden environment (production is forbidden by default). Use dev/staging per the exploration config, and default to read-only for a planning walkthrough.
• Treat console errors and unexpected network calls as findings — they often reveal undocumented behavior the PRD assumes is fine.
• Findings drive ## Open Questions on tickets, not silent assumptions. If the current product contradicts the PRD, surface it as a BLOCKER.
• This skill captures observations; it does not edit the tracker or the PRD. Consuming skills decide where findings land.