Parallel Plan

Parallel Plan

Overview

Use this skill as a lightweight implementation profile of manager-make-new-plan for current in-flight work. Its purpose is simple: do not try to do complex tasks alone; split into independent workstreams and use help. Keep the same core terminology (milestone/workstream/work package/patch), but reduce process weight so teams can start quickly. The ultimate goal is to reduce implementation wall time, not to maximize process, parallelism theater, or document volume.

Terminology Contract

• Milestone: short planning window for the current task.
• Workstream: parallel lane with one clear owner.
• Work package: assignment-sized chunk a single coder can finish.
• Patch: reviewable change set used for progress reporting.

Core Nudge

• If a task has 2 or more separable tracks, split it.
• If one person is becoming the bottleneck, split it.
• If independence is unclear, do prerequisite work first, then split the rest.
• Prefer asking for help early rather than debugging integration late.
• Judge every split by one question: will this reduce elapsed time to a correct implementation?

Relationship to Manager Planning

• manager-make-new-plan is the full manager-grade planning workflow.
• parallel-plan is the lightweight operational version for active execution.
• Use the same language and dependency discipline, but with less document overhead and faster dispatch.

Choose Execution Mode

• Decide between orchestration-only and real parallel execution.
• Choose the mode that minimizes elapsed time to a validated result.
• Use orchestration-only when environment limits prevent true concurrency. Still split into independent streams and write complete stream briefs.
• Use real parallel execution when streams can run at the same time in isolated sessions/worktrees or a single batched multi-task dispatch.
• If briefing, coordination, and merge overhead exceed likely time savings, do not parallelize.

Tooling and State

• Keep execution tooling non-prescriptive.
• Treat tmux as an optional helper, not a requirement.
• Accept any equivalent mechanism that provides true concurrent execution and isolation.
• Default to lightweight text artifacts for task state (stream briefs, stream reports, unified plan).
• Make the orchestrator choose report paths per run; do not hardcode a global fixed path.
• Use collision-safe naming for report paths (for example: run id + stream id + timestamp/random suffix).
• Prefer repo-local temp directories or other orchestrator-selected temp locations when practical.
• Add a task database (sqlite/Berkeley DB) only when cross-session resume or external query requirements are explicit.

Repo Agent Awareness

• Before assigning owners, inspect the repo-root agents/ directory if it exists.
• Treat those agents/*.md files as the available role catalog for this repo, not as decorative docs.
• Prefer assigning workstreams to actual available agent roles from that catalog.
• Read the agent files themselves before dispatch so role assignment reflects real capabilities and constraints, not just filenames.
• If the repo has no agents/ directory, fall back to generic owner labels.
• If the repo has both specialized and generic agents, prefer the most specialized agent that fits the stream.

In this repo, the currently available root agents and their intended uses are:

• orchestrator: split larger tasks into parallel subagents and synthesize outputs before code changes.
• parallelizer: coordinate parallel teams with messaging; good for active multi-stream execution.
• planner: write plans and docs only; never production code or tests.
• architect: approve or reject cross-cutting design changes and resolve design disputes.
• coder: implement production code from approved plans; no self-approval and no architectural redesign.
• integrator: merge completed work, resolve conflicts, and maintain branch stability.
• reviewer: read-only review and plan auditing; cannot modify production files.
• tester: create and run tests; only modify files under tests/.
• monitor: detect stalls, crashes, and deadlocks; read-only on code.
• scheduler: trigger recurring workflows and retries; not for implementation or diagnosis.
• maintainer: cleanup, lint maintenance, and index regeneration; not for feature work or architecture.

Workflow

1. Resolve shared prerequisites first.

• Identify shared contracts (types, interfaces, schemas, migration order).
• Execute shared prerequisites in the orchestrator main context.
• Complete shared prerequisites before parallel dispatch.

2. Define independent workstreams.

• Assign each stream a clear goal, scope boundary, and owned files/directories.
• Give each stream a named owner and, when available, an explicit agent role selected from the repo-root agents/ directory.
• Merge or re-scope any streams that would modify the same files.
• Prefer coder for production implementation streams.
• Prefer tester only for test work under tests/.
• Prefer reviewer for read-only code review, audit, and plan-conformance checks.
• Prefer integrator for merge sequencing, conflict resolution, and stabilization after streams complete.
• Prefer planner for documentation-only planning outputs.
• Prefer architect for streams that exist solely to settle a cross-cutting design decision.
• Prefer monitor for observing progress, stalls, and deadlocks rather than fixing code.
• Prefer scheduler only for recurring or retry-oriented coordination tasks.
• Prefer maintainer for cleanup, lint maintenance, and derived-index regeneration.
• Prefer the smallest number of streams that materially lowers wall time; more streams are not automatically better.

3. Dispatch correctly.

• For real parallel execution, launch streams concurrently in one batch dispatch or separate isolated sessions.
• Do not send stream tasks sequentially if true parallelism is required.

4. Enforce file-backed standardized stream outputs.

• Assign each stream an orchestrator-selected unique report path in the stream brief.
• Require each stream to write its full report only to the provided path.
• Require each stream to return only a compact handoff message with status, report path, validation status, and a short bullet summary.
• Require deep research streams to put full findings in report files and return only the compact handoff in chat.
• Reject stream responses that paste full reports or large logs inline.

5. Synthesize one ordered plan.

• Synthesize only after all stream validations pass; if any validation fails, stop and fix before synthesis.
• Read stream report files from orchestrator-assigned paths and merge them into one milestone execution sequence with checkpoints.
• Add integration risks, dependency notes, and fallback handling.

6. Gate before implementation.

• Confirm no unresolved cross-stream dependencies remain.
• Confirm each checkpoint has explicit verification commands.
• Confirm all expected stream report files exist and are readable before synthesis.

Lightweight Minimum Output

Use this minimum structure when speed matters:

1. Milestone objective (one paragraph)
2. Workstreams (owner, agent role if available, scope boundary, dependencies)
3. Work packages per workstream (small, assignable)
4. Patch plan (Patch 1, Patch 2, ...)
5. Checkpoints with verification commands

Do not skip dependency declarations. Milestone numbers are labels, not ordering. Ordering must be explicit through dependencies and gates.

Independence Rules

• Parallelize only streams that do not depend on each other in-flight outputs.
• Do not parallelize streams that edit the same files or the same mutable state.
• If independence is uncertain, serialize that portion.
• Prefer finishing dependency-establishing work first, then parallelizing the rest.
• Do not split work purely to keep more agents busy; idle agents are cheaper than merge-heavy fake parallelism.

Orchestrator Memory Rules

• Do not request full stream reports inline in orchestrator chat.
• Use file-path handoff first; read files on demand during synthesis.
• Default final handoffs to short bullet lists (3-6 bullets).
• Cap stream handoff size (for example, <=1 KB plus report path).
• Keep verbose command output and diagnostics inside report files, not in handoff messages.

Required Output Contract

Require this structure from each stream handoff message:

1. Status
2. Report file path
3. Summary (3-6 bullets)
4. Validation status (pass/fail)
5. Blocking issues (optional)

Require this structure inside each stream report file:

1. Assumptions
2. Decisions
3. Concrete next steps
4. Changed files
5. Validation performed

Then synthesize:

1. Ordered unified plan
2. Checkpoints with pass/fail criteria
3. Integration risks and mitigations

Templates

Use the reusable templates in references/parallel_plan_templates.md for:

• stream brief format
• compact stream handoff format
• stream report file format
• synthesis and checkpoint checklist
• anti-pattern checks for fake parallelism and memory overload