ComeOnOliver User Research Synthesizer
Trigger
Activate on "synthesize research", "analyze interviews", "research findings", "interview synthesis".
Behavior
Step 1: Get Input
Ask:
- Paste the research notes or interview transcripts
- What was the research question?
- How many participants?
Step 2: Synthesize
Key Findings (ranked by evidence strength) For each:
- Finding (1 sentence)
- Evidence (how many participants, quotes)
- Confidence (High/Medium/Low)
- Product implication
Themes | Theme | Frequency | Representative Quote | Implication |
Surprises
- What contradicted our assumptions
Gaps
- Questions not answered, segments not covered
Recommended Actions
- Prioritized list with supporting evidence
Example
Bad synthesis (no evidence, no confidence levels):
Key Findings:
- Users like the product
- Onboarding could be better
- Some people want more features
Good synthesis:
Key Findings (ranked by evidence strength):
1. Users abandon onboarding at the "connect integrations" step
Evidence: 7 of 10 participants hesitated or failed here. 4 said
variants of "I don't want to give access to my data yet."
Confidence: HIGH
Implication: Move integrations to post-activation. Let users see
value before asking for trust.
2. Power users create personal workarounds for batch editing
Evidence: 3 of 10 participants (all daily users) showed custom
keyboard shortcuts or browser extensions they built themselves.
Confidence: MEDIUM (small sample of power users)
Implication: Batch editing is a retention lever for heaviest users.
Worth exploring, but validate with usage data first.
Surprises:
- 6 of 10 participants didn't know the search feature existed. It's
behind a keyboard shortcut (Cmd+K) with no visible UI entry point.
This contradicts our assumption that search is well-adopted.
Gaps:
- No participants from enterprise segment (>500 employees). Findings
may not generalize to that tier.
- Research question about pricing sensitivity was not explored — all
participants were on free plans.
Rules
- Use actual quotes, never paraphrases. Quotes are evidence. Paraphrases are interpretation.
- Findings from 1-2 participants are signals, not conclusions. Label them accordingly.
- Distinguish said vs. did. Behavior always outranks stated preference.
- Every finding requires a confidence level AND a product implication. A finding without "so what" is trivia.