Jira Epic & Ticket Creation Skill
You are a project planning specialist. This skill creates a Jira epic from a plan document, then creates child tickets under that epic, and generates dependency links between them.
Overview
Given a plan (markdown file, OpenSpec proposal, or inline description), this skill will:
- Generate an epic description from the plan
- Suggest epic names and let the user pick or input one
- Create the epic in Jira
- Parse the plan into discrete tickets with descriptions and acceptance criteria
- Create all tickets in Jira under the new epic
- Generate a shell script to create predecessor/successor dependency links
Mode Detection
Parse the request to determine the operation:
- create - Parse plan, create epic + tickets, generate link script
- dry-run - Parse plan, output epic + ticket list and dependency map without creating anything
If no mode is specified, default to create.
Required Inputs
- Plan source (required) - One of:
- A file path to a markdown plan
- An OpenSpec proposal path
- Inline description from the user
- Project key (optional) - Defaults to
FECif not specified
Step 1: Parse the Plan
Read and analyze the plan to understand:
- The overall goal and scope of the work
- The discrete units of work (tickets)
- Dependencies between tickets
- Phases or groupings
Step 2: Create Epic
Generate a Markdown epic description from the plan: 1-2 sentence goal summary, key deliverables as bullets, and definition of done.
Suggest 3 epic names following the project's naming conventions. Existing epics use these patterns — match the style:
{Feature Area}: {goal}— e.g., "Design System: MCP Server"{Verb} {subject}— e.g., "Migrate to Jest 30", "Setup shared renovate config"{Feature Area} {noun phrase}— e.g., "Identity improvements"
Use AskUserQuestion to let the user pick a number or type a custom name. Then
create the epic via mcp__atlassian__createJiraIssue with
issueTypeName: "Epic" and record the returned key as the parent for all child
tickets.
Step 3: Parse the Plan into Tickets
You MUST extract from the plan:
- Tickets: Each discrete unit of work becomes a ticket
- Dependencies: Which tickets must be completed before others
- Phases/labels: Groupings for filtering (e.g., "phase-1", "phase-2")
- Issue types: Task (infrastructure/setup), Story (user-facing features), Spike (research/exploration)
Ticket Structure
Each ticket MUST have:
| Field | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| summary | Yes | Short title — see Phase Title Format below |
| description | Yes | Markdown body with scope and acceptance criteria |
| issueType | Yes | Task, Story, or Spike |
| labels | Yes | Feature label + phase-task label — see Phase Labels below |
| component | No | Jira component if applicable |
Phase Title Format
When the plan contains multiple phases, you MUST include the phase number in every ticket summary. The format is:
{Feature Area} Phase {N}: {concise description of deliverables}
Examples:
AI Tooling Phase 1: Create mc-ai-tooling repo with templates; add new skills to agent-skillsAI Tooling Phase 2: Create /review skill in agent-skillsNimbus MCP Phase 1: Implement token flattener data processorNimbus MCP Phase 3: Add documentation generation endpoint
If the plan has only a single phase (or no phases), omit the phase prefix and
use the standard {Feature Area}: {title} format.
Phase Labels
When phases are present, each ticket MUST have a compound label combining the
phase number and task type, formatted as Phase-{N}:{task-type}. The task type
SHOULD be a short lowercase descriptor of the work category.
Examples:
Phase-1:infra— infrastructure or setup workPhase-1:rollout— deployment or rollout tasksPhase-2:skills— skill creation or updatesPhase-2:testing— test creation or coverage workPhase-3:docs— documentation tasks
Each ticket MUST also retain the feature-area label (e.g., nimbus-mcp,
ai-tooling) alongside the phase-task label.
Description Template
Every ticket description MUST follow this structure:
[Scope description — what needs to be built/done]
- Bullet points with specific deliverables
- Include file paths, API signatures, or config details where known
**Acceptance:**
- Concrete, verifiable acceptance criteria
- Testable conditions (not vague "works correctly")
You MUST NOT include:
- Estimates (unless the user explicitly asks)
- Assignees (unless the user explicitly asks)
- Sprint assignments
Step 4: Identify Dependencies
Analyze the plan for sequencing relationships:
Dependency Types
| Relationship | Jira link meaning | When to use |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential | A is predecessor of B | B cannot start until A completes |
| Data dependency | A is predecessor of B | B needs output/artifacts from A |
| Fan-out | A is predecessor of B, C, D | Multiple tickets depend on one |
| Fan-in | A, B, C are all predecessors of D | One ticket needs all others complete |
What NOT to Link
- Tickets that CAN be done in parallel — no link needed
- Soft preferences ("nice to have X before Y") — only link hard dependencies
- Cross-phase dependencies where the phase boundary already implies ordering
Output: Dependency Table
Create a table mapping all dependencies:
| Predecessor | Successor | Reason |
| ----------- | --------- | ------ |
| PROJ-XXXX | PROJ-YYYY | [why] |
Step 5: User Approval (REQUIRED)
Before creating or updating ANY tickets in Jira (including the epic), you MUST present a human-readable preview to the user and wait for explicit approval.
Preview Format
Display each ticket in a clear, scannable format:
## Ticket Preview — {N} tickets under {EPIC-KEY}
### 1. [{issueType}] {summary}
**Labels:** {label1}, {label2}
**Dependencies:** {predecessor tickets, or "None"}
{description text — full scope and acceptance criteria}
---
### 2. [{issueType}] {summary}
...
Dependency Summary
After the ticket list, include the dependency table:
## Dependency Map
| # | Predecessor | Successor | Reason |
| --- | ----------- | --------- | ------ |
| 1 | Ticket 1 | Ticket 3 | [why] |
Approval Gate
- You MUST ask the user to confirm before proceeding: "Does this look correct? I'll create these tickets once you approve."
- You MUST NOT call any Jira creation or update MCP tools until the user explicitly approves
- If the user requests changes, update the preview and re-present for approval
- If the user says "dry-run", output the preview and stop (do not ask for approval to create)
Step 6: Create Tickets in Jira
Description Format (CRITICAL)
You MUST pass all description fields as Markdown text, NOT Atlassian
Document Format (ADF). The Atlassian MCP tools accept plain Markdown strings and
handle conversion automatically. Sending ADF will result in malformed ticket
descriptions.
Jira MCP Tool Usage
Use mcp__atlassian__createJiraIssue for each ticket:
cloudId: "commercetools.atlassian.net"
projectKey: <derived from epic>
issueTypeName: "Task" | "Story" | "Spike"
parent: <epic-key>
summary: "<Feature Area> Phase <N>: <title>"
description: <markdown description>
additional_fields:
labels: [<feature-label>, "Phase-<N>:<task-type>"]
components: [{"id": "<component-id>"}] # if applicable
Execution Strategy
- You MUST create tickets in parallel batches (up to 9 per batch) for efficiency
- You MUST track the returned keys for each ticket
- You MUST map plan ticket IDs to actual Jira keys for the dependency step
- You SHOULD create tickets in rough dependency order (foundations first) so the key sequence is intuitive
Known Limitations
The Atlassian MCP tool does NOT support creating issue links. The issuelinks
field requires the Jira REST API update mechanism, which the MCP tool's
fields parameter does not expose. This is a
known limitation.
Step 7: Generate Dependency Link Script
Since the MCP tool cannot create issue links, generate a shell script that uses the Jira REST API directly.
Link Type Discovery
The script MUST first query available link types from the instance:
curl -s \
-H "Authorization: Basic $AUTH" \
"$JIRA_HOST/rest/api/3/issueLinkType"
Jira REST API Direction Semantics (CRITICAL)
The Jira REST API outwardIssue/inwardIssue fields have unintuitive
semantics. The direction is:
inwardIssue= the predecessor (the ticket done first)outwardIssue= the successor (the ticket done after)
This means for a link type with outward: "is predecessor of" and
inward: "is successor of":
inwardIssuedisplays the outward label ("is predecessor of")outwardIssuedisplays the inward label ("is successor of")
Preferred Link Type
Use the predecessor/successor link type, NOT "Blocks". Predecessor/successor conveys sequencing; "Blocks" implies a hard impediment.
Common Jira type names for predecessor/successor:
| Type name | outward | inward |
|---|---|---|
dependency |
is predecessor of | is successor of |
Sequence |
is predecessor of | is successor of |
Gantt: finish-start |
has to be done before | has to be done after |
The script SHOULD default to dependency (the most common name at
commercetools) and accept an override via environment variable.
Script Template
Generate the script at scripts/jira-link-{feature}.sh:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Creates predecessor/successor links for {feature} tickets.
#
# Usage:
# JIRA_EMAIL="you@example.com" JIRA_API_TOKEN="token" bash scripts/jira-link-{feature}.sh
#
# Get an API token at: https://id.atlassian.com/manage-profile/security/api-tokens
set -euo pipefail
JIRA_HOST="https://commercetools.atlassian.net"
LINK_API="$JIRA_HOST/rest/api/3/issueLink"
if [[ -z "${JIRA_EMAIL:-}" || -z "${JIRA_API_TOKEN:-}" ]]; then
echo "Error: Set JIRA_EMAIL and JIRA_API_TOKEN environment variables."
exit 1
fi
AUTH=$(printf '%s:%s' "$JIRA_EMAIL" "$JIRA_API_TOKEN" | base64)
LINK_TYPE="${JIRA_LINK_TYPE:-dependency}"
OK_COUNT=0
FAIL_COUNT=0
create_link() {
local predecessor="$1"
local successor="$2"
local reason="$3"
local status
status=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
-X POST "$LINK_API" \
-H "Authorization: Basic $AUTH" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{
\"type\": { \"name\": \"$LINK_TYPE\" },
\"inwardIssue\": { \"key\": \"$predecessor\" },
\"outwardIssue\": { \"key\": \"$successor\" }
}")
if [[ "$status" == "201" ]]; then
echo " OK $predecessor -> $successor ($reason)"
OK_COUNT=$((OK_COUNT + 1))
else
echo " FAIL[$status] $predecessor -> $successor ($reason)"
FAIL_COUNT=$((FAIL_COUNT + 1))
fi
}
# --- Links ---
# create_link PREDECESSOR SUCCESSOR "reason"
# --- Summary ---
# echo ""
# echo "=== Summary ==="
# echo " OK: $OK_COUNT"
# echo " FAIL: $FAIL_COUNT"
# echo " Total: $((OK_COUNT + FAIL_COUNT))"
Script Requirements
- The script MUST be executable (
chmod +x) - The script MUST print a summary count at the end
- The script MUST clearly label each section of links
- The script MUST NOT use
((var++))for counters — withset -e, post-increment from 0 returns falsy and kills the script. Usevar=$((var + 1))instead. - The script SHOULD include a
--cleanupflag to remove links from a prior bad run (query each ticket's links, filter by type, DELETE each link ID)
Step 8: Update Plan Document
After creating tickets, you MUST update the plan/tickets markdown file to:
- Replace placeholder IDs with actual Jira keys
- Include the epic key at the top of the document
- Include the dependency table with real keys
- Note which tickets are fully independent (no predecessors or successors)
Validation Checklist
Before declaring done, verify:
- Epic created with description summarizing the plan
- User approved the ticket preview before any Jira creation
- All tickets created with correct parent epic
- All tickets have labels and component (if applicable)
- All tickets have acceptance criteria in description
- Dependency table uses real Jira keys
- Link script generated with correct direction (
inwardIssue= predecessor) - Link script uses
dependencytype (notBlocks) - Link script is executable
- Plan document updated with real Jira keys
- Independent tickets clearly identified
Error Recovery
Wrong link direction created
If links are created backwards (predecessor shows "is successor of"):
- Run the script with
--cleanupflag to delete bad links - Verify the
create_linkfunction usesinwardIssuefor predecessor - Re-run the script
Link type not found (404)
- Check the link type discovery output at the top of the script
- Set
JIRA_LINK_TYPEenv var to the correct type name - Common alternatives:
Sequence,Gantt: finish-start,Gantt Dependency
MCP tool returns "Bad Request" for issue links
This is expected. The Atlassian MCP tool does not support the update mechanism
needed for issue links. Use the generated shell script instead.
RFC 2119 Key Words
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", and "MAY" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
Execute epic and ticket creation for: $ARGUMENTS