Article Writing
Write long-form content that sounds like an actual person with a point of view, not an LLM smoothing itself into paste.
When to Activate
- drafting blog posts, essays, launch posts, guides, tutorials, or newsletter issues
- turning notes, transcripts, or research into polished articles
- matching an existing founder, operator, or brand voice from examples
- tightening structure, pacing, and evidence in already-written long-form copy
Core Rules
- Lead with the concrete thing: artifact, example, output, anecdote, number, screenshot, or code.
- Explain after the example, not before.
- Keep sentences tight unless the source voice is intentionally expansive.
- Use proof instead of adjectives.
- Never invent facts, credibility, or customer evidence.
Voice Capture Workflow
If the user wants a specific voice, collect one or more of:
- published articles
- newsletters
- X posts or threads
- docs or memos
- launch notes
- a style guide
Then extract:
- sentence length and rhythm
- whether the writing is compressed, explanatory, sharp, or formal
- how parentheses are used
- how often the writer asks questions
- whether the writer uses fragments, lists, or hard pivots
- formatting habits such as headers, bullets, code blocks, pull quotes
- what the writer clearly avoids
If no voice references are given, default to a sharp operator voice: concrete, unsentimental, useful.
Affaan / ECC Voice Reference
When matching Affaan / ECC voice, bias toward:
- direct claims over scene-setting
- high specificity
- parentheticals used for qualification or over-clarification, not comedy
- capitalization chosen situationally, not as a gimmick
- very low tolerance for fake thought-leadership cadence
- almost no bait questions
Banned Patterns
Delete and rewrite any of these:
- "In today's rapidly evolving landscape"
- "game-changer", "cutting-edge", "revolutionary"
- "no fluff"
- "not X, just Y"
- "here's why this matters" as a standalone bridge
- fake vulnerability arcs
- a closing question added only to juice engagement
- forced lowercase
- corny parenthetical asides
- biography padding that does not move the argument
Writing Process
- Clarify the audience and purpose.
- Build a hard outline with one job per section.
- Start sections with proof, artifact, conflict, or example.
- Expand only where the next sentence earns space.
- Cut anything that sounds templated, overexplained, or self-congratulatory.
Structure Guidance
Technical Guides
- open with what the reader gets
- use code, commands, screenshots, or concrete output in major sections
- end with actionable takeaways, not a soft recap
Essays / Opinion
- start with tension, contradiction, or a specific observation
- keep one argument thread per section
- make opinions answer to evidence
Newsletters
- keep the first screen doing real work
- do not front-load diary filler
- use section labels only when they improve scanability
Quality Gate
Before delivering:
- factual claims are backed by provided sources
- generic AI transitions are gone
- the voice matches the supplied examples
- every section adds something new
- formatting matches the intended medium
1---2name: article-writing3description: Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.4origin: ECC5---67# Article Writing89Write long-form content that sounds like an actual person with a point of view, not an LLM smoothing itself into paste.1011## When to Activate1213- drafting blog posts, essays, launch posts, guides, tutorials, or newsletter issues14- turning notes, transcripts, or research into polished articles15- matching an existing founder, operator, or brand voice from examples16- tightening structure, pacing, and evidence in already-written long-form copy1718## Core Rules19201. Lead with the concrete thing: artifact, example, output, anecdote, number, screenshot, or code.212. Explain after the example, not before.223. Keep sentences tight unless the source voice is intentionally expansive.234. Use proof instead of adjectives.245. Never invent facts, credibility, or customer evidence.2526## Voice Capture Workflow2728If the user wants a specific voice, collect one or more of:29- published articles30- newsletters31- X posts or threads32- docs or memos33- launch notes34- a style guide3536Then extract:37- sentence length and rhythm38- whether the writing is compressed, explanatory, sharp, or formal39- how parentheses are used40- how often the writer asks questions41- whether the writer uses fragments, lists, or hard pivots42- formatting habits such as headers, bullets, code blocks, pull quotes43- what the writer clearly avoids4445If no voice references are given, default to a sharp operator voice: concrete, unsentimental, useful.4647## Affaan / ECC Voice Reference4849When matching Affaan / ECC voice, bias toward:50- direct claims over scene-setting51- high specificity52- parentheticals used for qualification or over-clarification, not comedy53- capitalization chosen situationally, not as a gimmick54- very low tolerance for fake thought-leadership cadence55- almost no bait questions5657## Banned Patterns5859Delete and rewrite any of these:60- "In today's rapidly evolving landscape"61- "game-changer", "cutting-edge", "revolutionary"62- "no fluff"63- "not X, just Y"64- "here's why this matters" as a standalone bridge65- fake vulnerability arcs66- a closing question added only to juice engagement67- forced lowercase68- corny parenthetical asides69- biography padding that does not move the argument7071## Writing Process72731. Clarify the audience and purpose.742. Build a hard outline with one job per section.753. Start sections with proof, artifact, conflict, or example.764. Expand only where the next sentence earns space.775. Cut anything that sounds templated, overexplained, or self-congratulatory.7879## Structure Guidance8081### Technical Guides8283- open with what the reader gets84- use code, commands, screenshots, or concrete output in major sections85- end with actionable takeaways, not a soft recap8687### Essays / Opinion8889- start with tension, contradiction, or a specific observation90- keep one argument thread per section91- make opinions answer to evidence9293### Newsletters9495- keep the first screen doing real work96- do not front-load diary filler97- use section labels only when they improve scanability9899## Quality Gate100101Before delivering:102- factual claims are backed by provided sources103- generic AI transitions are gone104- the voice matches the supplied examples105- every section adds something new106- formatting matches the intended medium