Clinical Decision Support Documents
Description
Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical companies, clinical researchers, and medical decision-makers. This skill specializes in analytical, evidence-based documents that inform treatment strategies and drug development:
- Patient Cohort Analysis - Biomarker-stratified group analyses with statistical outcome comparisons
- Treatment Recommendation Reports - Evidence-based clinical guidelines with GRADE grading and decision algorithms
All documents are generated as publication-ready LaTeX/PDF files optimized for pharmaceutical research, regulatory submissions, and clinical guideline development.
Note: For individual patient treatment plans at the bedside, use the treatment-plans skill instead. This skill focuses on group-level analyses and evidence synthesis for pharmaceutical/research settings.
Writing Style: For publication-ready documents targeting medical journals, consult the venue-templates skill's medical_journal_styles.md for guidance on structured abstracts, evidence language, and CONSORT/STROBE compliance.
Capabilities
Document Types
Patient Cohort Analysis
- Biomarker-based patient stratification (molecular subtypes, gene expression, IHC)
- Molecular subtype classification (e.g., GBM mesenchymal-immune-active vs proneural, breast cancer subtypes)
- Outcome metrics with statistical analysis (OS, PFS, ORR, DOR, DCR)
- Statistical comparisons between subgroups (hazard ratios, p-values, 95% CI)
- Survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests
- Efficacy tables and waterfall plots
- Comparative effectiveness analyses
- Pharmaceutical cohort reporting (trial subgroups, real-world evidence)
Treatment Recommendation Reports
- Evidence-based treatment guidelines for specific disease states
- Strength of recommendation grading (GRADE system: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)
- Quality of evidence assessment (high, moderate, low, very low)
- Treatment algorithm flowcharts with TikZ diagrams
- Line-of-therapy sequencing based on biomarkers
- Decision pathways with clinical and molecular criteria
- Pharmaceutical strategy documents
- Clinical guideline development for medical societies
Clinical Features
- Biomarker Integration: Genomic alterations (mutations, CNV, fusions), gene expression signatures, IHC markers, PD-L1 scoring
- Statistical Analysis: Hazard ratios, p-values, confidence intervals, survival curves, Cox regression, log-rank tests
- Evidence Grading: GRADE system (1A/1B/2A/2B/2C), Oxford CEBM levels, quality of evidence assessment
- Clinical Terminology: SNOMED-CT, LOINC, proper medical nomenclature, trial nomenclature
- Regulatory Compliance: HIPAA de-identification, confidentiality headers, ICH-GCP alignment
- Professional Formatting: Compact 0.5in margins, color-coded recommendations, publication-ready, suitable for regulatory submissions
Pharmaceutical and Research Use Cases
This skill is specifically designed for pharmaceutical and clinical research applications:
Drug Development
- Phase 2/3 Trial Analyses: Biomarker-stratified efficacy and safety analyses
- Subgroup Analyses: Forest plots showing treatment effects across patient subgroups
- Companion Diagnostic Development: Linking biomarkers to drug response
- Regulatory Submissions: IND/NDA documentation with evidence summaries
Medical Affairs
- KOL Education Materials: Evidence-based treatment algorithms for thought leaders
- Medical Strategy Documents: Competitive landscape and positioning strategies
- Advisory Board Materials: Cohort analyses and treatment recommendation frameworks
- Publication Planning: Manuscript-ready analyses for peer-reviewed journals
Clinical Guidelines
- Guideline Development: Evidence synthesis with GRADE methodology for specialty societies
- Consensus Recommendations: Multi-stakeholder treatment algorithm development
- Practice Standards: Biomarker-based treatment selection criteria
- Quality Measures: Evidence-based performance metrics
Real-World Evidence
- RWE Cohort Studies: Retrospective analyses of patient cohorts from EMR data
- Comparative Effectiveness: Head-to-head treatment comparisons in real-world settings
- Outcomes Research: Long-term survival and safety in clinical practice
- Health Economics: Cost-effectiveness analyses by biomarker subgroup
When to Use
Use this skill when you need to:
- Analyze patient cohorts stratified by biomarkers, molecular subtypes, or clinical characteristics
- Generate treatment recommendation reports with evidence grading for clinical guidelines or pharmaceutical strategies
- Compare outcomes between patient subgroups with statistical analysis (survival, response rates, hazard ratios)
- Produce pharmaceutical research documents for drug development, clinical trials, or regulatory submissions
- Develop clinical practice guidelines with GRADE evidence grading and decision algorithms
- Document biomarker-guided therapy selection at the population level (not individual patients)
- Synthesize evidence from multiple trials or real-world data sources
- Create clinical decision algorithms with flowcharts for treatment sequencing
Do NOT use this skill for:
- Individual patient treatment plans (use
treatment-plans skill)
- Bedside clinical care documentation (use
treatment-plans skill)
- Simple patient-specific treatment protocols (use
treatment-plans skill)
Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
⚠️ MANDATORY: Every clinical decision support document MUST include at least 1-2 AI-generated figures using the scientific-schematics skill.
This is not optional. Clinical decision documents require clear visual algorithms. Before finalizing any document:
- Generate at minimum ONE schematic or diagram (e.g., clinical decision algorithm, treatment pathway, or biomarker stratification tree)
- For cohort analyses: include patient flow diagram
- For treatment recommendations: include decision flowchart
How to generate figures:
- Use the scientific-schematics skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic
How to generate schematics:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
The AI will automatically:
- Create publication-quality images with proper formatting
- Review and refine through multiple iterations
- Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)
- Save outputs in the figures/ directory
When to add schematics:
- Clinical decision algorithm flowcharts
- Treatment pathway diagrams
- Biomarker stratification trees
- Patient cohort flow diagrams (CONSORT-style)
- Survival curve visualizations
- Molecular mechanism diagrams
- Any complex concept that benefits from visualization
For detailed guidance on creating schematics, refer to the scientific-schematics skill documentation.
Document Structure
CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: All clinical decision support documents MUST begin with a complete executive summary on page 1 that spans the entire first page before any table of contents or detailed sections.
Page 1 Executive Summary Structure
The first page of every CDS document should contain ONLY the executive summary with the following components:
Required Elements (all on page 1):
Document Title and Type
- Main title (e.g., "Biomarker-Stratified Cohort Analysis" or "Evidence-Based Treatment Recommendations")
- Subtitle with disease state and focus
Report Information Box (using colored tcolorbox)
- Document type and purpose
- Date of analysis/report
- Disease state and patient population
- Author/institution (if applicable)
- Analysis framework or methodology
Key Findings Boxes (3-5 colored boxes using tcolorbox)
- Primary Results (blue box): Main efficacy/outcome findings
- Biomarker Insights (green box): Key molecular subtype findings
- Clinical Implications (yellow/orange box): Actionable treatment implications
- Statistical Summary (gray box): Hazard ratios, p-values, key statistics
- Safety Highlights (red box, if applicable): Critical adverse events or warnings
Visual Requirements:
- Use
\thispagestyle{empty} to remove page numbers from page 1
- All content must fit on page 1 (before
\newpage)
- Use colored tcolorbox environments with different colors for visual hierarchy
- Boxes should be scannable and highlight most critical information
- Use bullet points, not narrative paragraphs
- End page 1 with
\newpage before table of contents or detailed sections
Example First Page LaTeX Structure:
\maketitle
\thispagestyle{empty}
% Report Information Box
\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=blue!5!white, colframe=blue!75!black, title=Report Information]
\textbf{Document Type:} Patient Cohort Analysis\\
\textbf{Disease State:} HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer\\
\textbf{Analysis Date:} \today\\
\textbf{Population:} 60 patients, biomarker-stratified by HR status
\end{tcolorbox}
\vspace{0.3cm}
% Key Finding #1: Primary Results
\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=blue!5!white, colframe=blue!75!black, title=Primary Efficacy Results]
\begin{itemize}
\item Overall ORR: 72\% (95\% CI: 59-83\%)
\item Median PFS: 18.5 months (95\% CI: 14.2-22.8)
\item Median OS: 35.2 months (95\% CI: 28.1-NR)
\end{itemize}
\end{tcolorbox}
\vspace{0.3cm}
% Key Finding #2: Biomarker Insights
\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=green!5!white, colframe=green!75!black, title=Biomarker Stratification Findings]
\begin{itemize}
\item HR+/HER2+: ORR 68\%, median PFS 16.2 months
\item HR-/HER2+: ORR 78\%, median PFS 22.1 months
\item HR status significantly associated with outcomes (p=0.041)
\end{itemize}
\end{tcolorbox}
\vspace{0.3cm}
% Key Finding #3: Clinical Implications
\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=orange!5!white, colframe=orange!75!black, title=Clinical Recommendations]
\begin{itemize}
\item Strong efficacy observed regardless of HR status (Grade 1A)
\item HR-/HER2+ patients showed numerically superior outcomes
\item Treatment recommended for all HER2+ MBC patients
\end{itemize}
\end{tcolorbox}
\newpage
\tableofcontents % TOC on page 2
\newpage % Detailed content starts page 3
Patient Cohort Analysis (Detailed Sections - Page 3+)
- Cohort Characteristics: Demographics, baseline features, patient selection criteria
- Biomarker Stratification: Molecular subtypes, genomic alterations, IHC profiles
- Treatment Exposure: Therapies received, dosing, treatment duration by subgroup
- Outcome Analysis: Response rates (ORR, DCR), survival data (OS, PFS), DOR
- Statistical Methods: Kaplan-Meier survival curves, hazard ratios, log-rank tests, Cox regression
- Subgroup Comparisons: Biomarker-stratified efficacy, forest plots, statistical significance
- Safety Profile: Adverse events by subgroup, dose modifications, discontinuations
- Clinical Recommendations: Treatment implications based on biomarker profiles
- Figures: Waterfall plots, swimmer plots, survival curves, forest plots
- Tables: Demographics table, biomarker frequency, outcomes by subgroup
Treatment Recommendation Reports (Detailed Sections - Page 3+)
Page 1 Executive Summary for Treatment Recommendations should include:
- Report Information Box: Disease state, guideline version/date, target population
- Key Recommendations Box (green): Top 3-5 GRADE-graded recommendations by line of therapy
- Biomarker Decision Criteria Box (blue): Key molecular markers influencing treatment selection
- Evidence Summary Box (gray): Major trials supporting recommendations (e.g., KEYNOTE-189, FLAURA)
- Critical Monitoring Box (orange/red): Essential safety monitoring requirements
Detailed Sections (Page 3+):
- Clinical Context: Disease state, epidemiology, current treatment landscape
- Target Population: Patient characteristics, biomarker criteria, staging
- Evidence Review: Systematic literature synthesis, guideline summary, trial data
- Treatment Options: Available therapies with mechanism of action
- Evidence Grading: GRADE assessment for each recommendation (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)
- Recommendations by Line: First-line, second-line, subsequent therapies
- Biomarker-Guided Selection: Decision criteria based on molecular profiles
- Treatment Algorithms: TikZ flowcharts showing decision pathways
- Monitoring Protocol: Safety assessments, efficacy monitoring, dose modifications
- Special Populations: Elderly, renal/hepatic impairment, comorbidities
- References: Full bibliography with trial names and citations
Output Format
MANDATORY FIRST PAGE REQUIREMENT:
- Page 1: Full-page executive summary with 3-5 colored tcolorbox elements
- Page 2: Table of contents (optional)
- Page 3+: Detailed sections with methods, results, figures, tables
Document Specifications:
- Primary: LaTeX/PDF with 0.5in margins for compact, data-dense presentation
- Length: Typically 5-15 pages (1 page executive summary + 4-14 pages detailed content)
- Style: Publication-ready, pharmaceutical-grade, suitable for regulatory submissions
- First Page: Always a complete executive summary spanning entire page 1 (see Document Structure section)
Visual Elements:
- Colors:
- Page 1 boxes: blue=data/information, green=biomarkers/recommendations, yellow/orange=clinical implications, red=warnings
- Recommendation boxes (green=strong recommendation, yellow=conditional, blue=research needed)
- Biomarker stratification (color-coded molecular subtypes)
- Statistical significance (color-coded p-values, hazard ratios)
- Tables:
- Demographics with baseline characteristics
- Biomarker frequency by subgroup
- Outcomes table (ORR, PFS, OS, DOR by molecular subtype)
- Adverse events by cohort
- Evidence summary tables with GRADE ratings
- Figures:
- Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank p-values and number at risk tables
- Waterfall plots showing best response by patient
- Forest plots for subgroup analyses with confidence intervals
- TikZ decision algorithm flowcharts
- Swimmer plots for individual patient timelines
- Statistics: Hazard ratios with 95% CI, p-values, median survival times, landmark survival rates
- Compliance: De-identification per HIPAA Safe Harbor, confidentiality notices for proprietary data
Integration
This skill integrates with:
- scientific-writing: Citation management, statistical reporting, evidence synthesis
- clinical-reports: Medical terminology, HIPAA compliance, regulatory documentation
- scientific-schematics: TikZ flowcharts for decision algorithms and treatment pathways
- treatment-plans: Individual patient applications of cohort-derived insights (bidirectional)
Key Differentiators from Treatment-Plans Skill
Clinical Decision Support (this skill):
- Audience: Pharmaceutical companies, clinical researchers, guideline committees, medical affairs
- Scope: Population-level analyses, evidence synthesis, guideline development
- Focus: Biomarker stratification, statistical comparisons, evidence grading
- Output: Multi-page analytical documents (5-15 pages typical) with extensive figures and tables
- Use Cases: Drug development, regulatory submissions, clinical practice guidelines, medical strategy
- Example: "Analyze 60 HER2+ breast cancer patients by hormone receptor status with survival outcomes"
Treatment-Plans Skill:
- Audience: Clinicians, patients, care teams
- Scope: Individual patient care planning
- Focus: SMART goals, patient-specific interventions, monitoring plans
- Output: Concise 1-4 page actionable care plans
- Use Cases: Bedside clinical care, EMR documentation, patient-centered planning
- Example: "Create treatment plan for a 55-year-old patient with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes"
When to use each:
- Use clinical-decision-support for: cohort analyses, biomarker stratification studies, treatment guideline development, pharmaceutical strategy documents
- Use treatment-plans for: individual patient care plans, treatment protocols for specific patients, bedside clinical documentation
Example Usage
Patient Cohort Analysis
Example 1: NSCLC Biomarker Stratification
> Analyze a cohort of 45 NSCLC patients stratified by PD-L1 expression (<1%, 1-49%, ≥50%)
> receiving pembrolizumab. Include outcomes: ORR, median PFS, median OS with hazard ratios
> comparing PD-L1 ≥50% vs <50%. Generate Kaplan-Meier curves and waterfall plot.
Example 2: GBM Molecular Subtype Analysis
> Generate cohort analysis for 30 GBM patients classified into Cluster 1 (Mesenchymal-Immune-Active)
> and Cluster 2 (Proneural) molecular subtypes. Compare outcomes including median OS, 6-month PFS rate,
> and response to TMZ+bevacizumab. Include biomarker profile table and statistical comparison.
Example 3: Breast Cancer HER2 Cohort
> Analyze 60 HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-deruxtecan,
> stratified by prior trastuzumab exposure (yes/no). Include ORR, DOR, median PFS with forest plot
> showing subgroup analyses by hormone receptor status, brain metastases, and number of prior lines.
Treatment Recommendation Report
Example 1: HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Guidelines
> Create evidence-based treatment recommendations for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer including
> biomarker-guided therapy selection. Use GRADE system to grade recommendations for first-line
> (trastuzumab+pertuzumab+taxane), second-line (trastuzumab-deruxtecan), and third-line options.
> Include decision algorithm flowchart based on brain metastases, hormone receptor status, and prior therapies.
Example 2: Advanced NSCLC Treatment Algorithm
> Generate treatment recommendation report for advanced NSCLC based on PD-L1 expression, EGFR mutation,
> ALK rearrangement, and performance status. Include GRADE-graded recommendations for each molecular subtype,
> TikZ flowchart for biomarker-directed therapy selection, and evidence tables from KEYNOTE-189, FLAURA,
> and CheckMate-227 trials.
Example 3: Multiple Myeloma Line-of-Therapy Sequencing
> Create treatment algorithm for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma through relapsed/refractory setting.
> Include GRADE recommendations for transplant-eligible vs ineligible, high-risk cytogenetics considerations,
> and sequencing of daratumumab, carfilzomib, and CAR-T therapy. Provide flowchart showing decision points
> at each line of therapy.
Key Features
Biomarker Classification
- Genomic: Mutations, CNV, gene fusions
- Expression: RNA-seq, IHC scores
- Molecular subtypes: Disease-specific classifications
- Clinical actionability: Therapy selection guidance
Outcome Metrics
- Survival: OS (overall survival), PFS (progression-free survival)
- Response: ORR (objective response rate), DOR (duration of response), DCR (disease control rate)
- Quality: ECOG performance status, symptom burden
- Safety: Adverse events, dose modifications
Statistical Methods
- Survival analysis: Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests
- Group comparisons: t-tests, chi-square, Fisher's exact
- Effect sizes: Hazard ratios, odds ratios with 95% CI
- Significance: p-values, multiple testing corrections
Evidence Grading
GRADE System
- 1A: Strong recommendation, high-quality evidence
- 1B: Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence
- 2A: Weak recommendation, high-quality evidence
- 2B: Weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence
- 2C: Weak recommendation, low-quality evidence
Recommendation Strength
- Strong: Benefits clearly outweigh risks
- Conditional: Trade-offs exist, patient values important
- Research: Insufficient evidence, clinical trials needed
Best Practices
For Cohort Analyses
- Patient Selection Transparency: Clearly document inclusion/exclusion criteria, patient flow, and reasons for exclusions
- Biomarker Clarity: Specify assay methods, platforms (e.g., FoundationOne, Caris), cut-points, and validation status
- Statistical Rigor:
- Report hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals, not just p-values
- Include median follow-up time for survival analyses
- Specify statistical tests used (log-rank, Cox regression, Fisher's exact)
- Account for multiple comparisons when appropriate
- Outcome Definitions: Use standard criteria:
- Response: RECIST 1.1, iRECIST for immunotherapy
- Adverse events: CTCAE version 5.0
- Performance status: ECOG or Karnofsky
- Survival Data Presentation:
- Median OS/PFS with 95% CI
- Landmark survival rates (6-month, 12-month, 24-month)
- Number at risk tables below Kaplan-Meier curves
- Censoring clearly indicated
- Subgroup Analyses: Pre-specify subgroups; clearly label exploratory vs pre-planned analyses
- Data Completeness: Report missing data and how it was handled
For Treatment Recommendation Reports
- Evidence Grading Transparency:
- Use GRADE system consistently (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)
- Document rationale for each grade
- Clearly state quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, very low)
- Comprehensive Evidence Review:
- Include phase 3 randomized trials as primary evidence
- Supplement with phase 2 data for emerging therapies
- Note real-world evidence and meta-analyses
- Cite trial names (e.g., KEYNOTE-189, CheckMate-227)
- Biomarker-Guided Recommendations:
- Link specific biomarkers to therapy recommendations
- Specify testing methods and validated assays
- Include FDA/EMA approval status for companion diagnostics
- Clinical Actionability: Every recommendation should have clear implementation guidance
- Decision Algorithm Clarity: TikZ flowcharts should be unambiguous with clear yes/no decision points
- Special Populations: Address elderly, renal/hepatic impairment, pregnancy, drug interactions
- Monitoring Guidance: Specify safety labs, imaging, and frequency
- Update Frequency: Date recommendations and plan for periodic updates
General Best Practices
- First Page Executive Summary (MANDATORY):
- ALWAYS create a complete executive summary on page 1 that spans the entire first page
- Use 3-5 colored tcolorbox elements to highlight key findings
- No table of contents or detailed sections on page 1
- Use
\thispagestyle{empty} and end with \newpage
- This is the single most important page - it should be scannable in 60 seconds
- De-identification: Remove all 18 HIPAA identifiers before document generation (Safe Harbor method)
- Regulatory Compliance: Include confidentiality notices for proprietary pharmaceutical data
- Publication-Ready Formatting: Use 0.5in margins, professional fonts, color-coded sections
- Reproducibility: Document all statistical methods to enable replication
- Conflict of Interest: Disclose pharmaceutical funding or relationships when applicable
- Visual Hierarchy: Use colored boxes consistently (blue=data, green=biomarkers, yellow/orange=recommendations, red=warnings)
References
See the references/ directory for detailed guidance on:
- Patient cohort analysis and stratification methods
- Treatment recommendation development
- Clinical decision algorithms
- Biomarker classification and interpretation
- Outcome analysis and statistical methods
- Evidence synthesis and grading systems
Templates
See the assets/ directory for LaTeX templates:
cohort_analysis_template.tex - Biomarker-stratified patient cohort analysis with statistical comparisons
treatment_recommendation_template.tex - Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines with GRADE grading
clinical_pathway_template.tex - TikZ decision algorithm flowcharts for treatment sequencing
biomarker_report_template.tex - Molecular subtype classification and genomic profile reports
Template Features:
- 0.5in margins for compact presentation
- Color-coded recommendation boxes
- Professional tables for demographics, biomarkers, outcomes
- Built-in support for Kaplan-Meier curves, waterfall plots, forest plots
- GRADE evidence grading tables
- Confidentiality headers for pharmaceutical documents
Scripts
See the scripts/ directory for analysis and visualization tools:
generate_survival_analysis.py - Kaplan-Meier curve generation with log-rank tests, hazard ratios, 95% CI
create_waterfall_plot.py - Best response visualization for cohort analyses
create_forest_plot.py - Subgroup analysis visualization with confidence intervals
create_cohort_tables.py - Demographics, biomarker frequency, and outcomes tables
build_decision_tree.py - TikZ flowchart generation for treatment algorithms
biomarker_classifier.py - Patient stratification algorithms by molecular subtype
calculate_statistics.py - Hazard ratios, Cox regression, log-rank tests, Fisher's exact
validate_cds_document.py - Quality and compliance checks (HIPAA, statistical reporting standards)
grade_evidence.py - Automated GRADE assessment helper for treatment recommendations
1---2name: clinical-decision-support3description: Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.4license: MIT License5---67# Clinical Decision Support Documents89## Description1011Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical companies, clinical researchers, and medical decision-makers. This skill specializes in analytical, evidence-based documents that inform treatment strategies and drug development:12131. **Patient Cohort Analysis** - Biomarker-stratified group analyses with statistical outcome comparisons142. **Treatment Recommendation Reports** - Evidence-based clinical guidelines with GRADE grading and decision algorithms1516All documents are generated as publication-ready LaTeX/PDF files optimized for pharmaceutical research, regulatory submissions, and clinical guideline development.1718**Note:** For individual patient treatment plans at the bedside, use the `treatment-plans` skill instead. This skill focuses on group-level analyses and evidence synthesis for pharmaceutical/research settings.1920**Writing Style:** For publication-ready documents targeting medical journals, consult the **venue-templates** skill's `medical_journal_styles.md` for guidance on structured abstracts, evidence language, and CONSORT/STROBE compliance.2122## Capabilities2324### Document Types2526**Patient Cohort Analysis**27- Biomarker-based patient stratification (molecular subtypes, gene expression, IHC)28- Molecular subtype classification (e.g., GBM mesenchymal-immune-active vs proneural, breast cancer subtypes)29- Outcome metrics with statistical analysis (OS, PFS, ORR, DOR, DCR)30- Statistical comparisons between subgroups (hazard ratios, p-values, 95% CI)31- Survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests32- Efficacy tables and waterfall plots33- Comparative effectiveness analyses34- Pharmaceutical cohort reporting (trial subgroups, real-world evidence)3536**Treatment Recommendation Reports**37- Evidence-based treatment guidelines for specific disease states38- Strength of recommendation grading (GRADE system: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)39- Quality of evidence assessment (high, moderate, low, very low)40- Treatment algorithm flowcharts with TikZ diagrams41- Line-of-therapy sequencing based on biomarkers42- Decision pathways with clinical and molecular criteria43- Pharmaceutical strategy documents44- Clinical guideline development for medical societies4546### Clinical Features4748- **Biomarker Integration**: Genomic alterations (mutations, CNV, fusions), gene expression signatures, IHC markers, PD-L1 scoring49- **Statistical Analysis**: Hazard ratios, p-values, confidence intervals, survival curves, Cox regression, log-rank tests50- **Evidence Grading**: GRADE system (1A/1B/2A/2B/2C), Oxford CEBM levels, quality of evidence assessment51- **Clinical Terminology**: SNOMED-CT, LOINC, proper medical nomenclature, trial nomenclature52- **Regulatory Compliance**: HIPAA de-identification, confidentiality headers, ICH-GCP alignment53- **Professional Formatting**: Compact 0.5in margins, color-coded recommendations, publication-ready, suitable for regulatory submissions5455## Pharmaceutical and Research Use Cases5657This skill is specifically designed for pharmaceutical and clinical research applications:5859**Drug Development**60- **Phase 2/3 Trial Analyses**: Biomarker-stratified efficacy and safety analyses61- **Subgroup Analyses**: Forest plots showing treatment effects across patient subgroups62- **Companion Diagnostic Development**: Linking biomarkers to drug response63- **Regulatory Submissions**: IND/NDA documentation with evidence summaries6465**Medical Affairs**66- **KOL Education Materials**: Evidence-based treatment algorithms for thought leaders67- **Medical Strategy Documents**: Competitive landscape and positioning strategies68- **Advisory Board Materials**: Cohort analyses and treatment recommendation frameworks69- **Publication Planning**: Manuscript-ready analyses for peer-reviewed journals7071**Clinical Guidelines**72- **Guideline Development**: Evidence synthesis with GRADE methodology for specialty societies73- **Consensus Recommendations**: Multi-stakeholder treatment algorithm development74- **Practice Standards**: Biomarker-based treatment selection criteria75- **Quality Measures**: Evidence-based performance metrics7677**Real-World Evidence**78- **RWE Cohort Studies**: Retrospective analyses of patient cohorts from EMR data79- **Comparative Effectiveness**: Head-to-head treatment comparisons in real-world settings80- **Outcomes Research**: Long-term survival and safety in clinical practice81- **Health Economics**: Cost-effectiveness analyses by biomarker subgroup8283## When to Use8485Use this skill when you need to:8687- **Analyze patient cohorts** stratified by biomarkers, molecular subtypes, or clinical characteristics88- **Generate treatment recommendation reports** with evidence grading for clinical guidelines or pharmaceutical strategies89- **Compare outcomes** between patient subgroups with statistical analysis (survival, response rates, hazard ratios)90- **Produce pharmaceutical research documents** for drug development, clinical trials, or regulatory submissions91- **Develop clinical practice guidelines** with GRADE evidence grading and decision algorithms92- **Document biomarker-guided therapy selection** at the population level (not individual patients)93- **Synthesize evidence** from multiple trials or real-world data sources94- **Create clinical decision algorithms** with flowcharts for treatment sequencing9596**Do NOT use this skill for:**97- Individual patient treatment plans (use `treatment-plans` skill)98- Bedside clinical care documentation (use `treatment-plans` skill)99- Simple patient-specific treatment protocols (use `treatment-plans` skill)100101## Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics102103**⚠️ MANDATORY: Every clinical decision support document MUST include at least 1-2 AI-generated figures using the scientific-schematics skill.**104105This is not optional. Clinical decision documents require clear visual algorithms. Before finalizing any document:1061. Generate at minimum ONE schematic or diagram (e.g., clinical decision algorithm, treatment pathway, or biomarker stratification tree)1072. For cohort analyses: include patient flow diagram1083. For treatment recommendations: include decision flowchart109110**How to generate figures:**111- Use the **scientific-schematics** skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams112- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language113- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic114115**How to generate schematics:**116```bash117python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png118```119120The AI will automatically:121- Create publication-quality images with proper formatting122- Review and refine through multiple iterations123- Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)124- Save outputs in the figures/ directory125126**When to add schematics:**127- Clinical decision algorithm flowcharts128- Treatment pathway diagrams129- Biomarker stratification trees130- Patient cohort flow diagrams (CONSORT-style)131- Survival curve visualizations132- Molecular mechanism diagrams133- Any complex concept that benefits from visualization134135For detailed guidance on creating schematics, refer to the scientific-schematics skill documentation.136137---138139## Document Structure140141**CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: All clinical decision support documents MUST begin with a complete executive summary on page 1 that spans the entire first page before any table of contents or detailed sections.**142143### Page 1 Executive Summary Structure144145The first page of every CDS document should contain ONLY the executive summary with the following components:146147**Required Elements (all on page 1):**1481. **Document Title and Type**149 - Main title (e.g., "Biomarker-Stratified Cohort Analysis" or "Evidence-Based Treatment Recommendations")150 - Subtitle with disease state and focus151 1522. **Report Information Box** (using colored tcolorbox)153 - Document type and purpose154 - Date of analysis/report155 - Disease state and patient population156 - Author/institution (if applicable)157 - Analysis framework or methodology158 1593. **Key Findings Boxes** (3-5 colored boxes using tcolorbox)160 - **Primary Results** (blue box): Main efficacy/outcome findings161 - **Biomarker Insights** (green box): Key molecular subtype findings162 - **Clinical Implications** (yellow/orange box): Actionable treatment implications163 - **Statistical Summary** (gray box): Hazard ratios, p-values, key statistics164 - **Safety Highlights** (red box, if applicable): Critical adverse events or warnings165166**Visual Requirements:**167- Use `\thispagestyle{empty}` to remove page numbers from page 1168- All content must fit on page 1 (before `\newpage`)169- Use colored tcolorbox environments with different colors for visual hierarchy170- Boxes should be scannable and highlight most critical information171- Use bullet points, not narrative paragraphs172- End page 1 with `\newpage` before table of contents or detailed sections173174**Example First Page LaTeX Structure:**175```latex176\maketitle177\thispagestyle{empty}178179% Report Information Box180\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=blue!5!white, colframe=blue!75!black, title=Report Information]181\textbf{Document Type:} Patient Cohort Analysis\\182\textbf{Disease State:} HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer\\183\textbf{Analysis Date:} \today\\184\textbf{Population:} 60 patients, biomarker-stratified by HR status185\end{tcolorbox}186187\vspace{0.3cm}188189% Key Finding #1: Primary Results190\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=blue!5!white, colframe=blue!75!black, title=Primary Efficacy Results]191\begin{itemize}192 \item Overall ORR: 72\% (95\% CI: 59-83\%)193 \item Median PFS: 18.5 months (95\% CI: 14.2-22.8)194 \item Median OS: 35.2 months (95\% CI: 28.1-NR)195\end{itemize}196\end{tcolorbox}197198\vspace{0.3cm}199200% Key Finding #2: Biomarker Insights201\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=green!5!white, colframe=green!75!black, title=Biomarker Stratification Findings]202\begin{itemize}203 \item HR+/HER2+: ORR 68\%, median PFS 16.2 months204 \item HR-/HER2+: ORR 78\%, median PFS 22.1 months205 \item HR status significantly associated with outcomes (p=0.041)206\end{itemize}207\end{tcolorbox}208209\vspace{0.3cm}210211% Key Finding #3: Clinical Implications212\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=orange!5!white, colframe=orange!75!black, title=Clinical Recommendations]213\begin{itemize}214 \item Strong efficacy observed regardless of HR status (Grade 1A)215 \item HR-/HER2+ patients showed numerically superior outcomes216 \item Treatment recommended for all HER2+ MBC patients217\end{itemize}218\end{tcolorbox}219220\newpage221\tableofcontents % TOC on page 2222\newpage % Detailed content starts page 3223```224225### Patient Cohort Analysis (Detailed Sections - Page 3+)226- **Cohort Characteristics**: Demographics, baseline features, patient selection criteria227- **Biomarker Stratification**: Molecular subtypes, genomic alterations, IHC profiles228- **Treatment Exposure**: Therapies received, dosing, treatment duration by subgroup229- **Outcome Analysis**: Response rates (ORR, DCR), survival data (OS, PFS), DOR230- **Statistical Methods**: Kaplan-Meier survival curves, hazard ratios, log-rank tests, Cox regression231- **Subgroup Comparisons**: Biomarker-stratified efficacy, forest plots, statistical significance232- **Safety Profile**: Adverse events by subgroup, dose modifications, discontinuations233- **Clinical Recommendations**: Treatment implications based on biomarker profiles234- **Figures**: Waterfall plots, swimmer plots, survival curves, forest plots235- **Tables**: Demographics table, biomarker frequency, outcomes by subgroup236237### Treatment Recommendation Reports (Detailed Sections - Page 3+)238239**Page 1 Executive Summary for Treatment Recommendations should include:**2401. **Report Information Box**: Disease state, guideline version/date, target population2412. **Key Recommendations Box** (green): Top 3-5 GRADE-graded recommendations by line of therapy2423. **Biomarker Decision Criteria Box** (blue): Key molecular markers influencing treatment selection2434. **Evidence Summary Box** (gray): Major trials supporting recommendations (e.g., KEYNOTE-189, FLAURA)2445. **Critical Monitoring Box** (orange/red): Essential safety monitoring requirements245246**Detailed Sections (Page 3+):**247- **Clinical Context**: Disease state, epidemiology, current treatment landscape248- **Target Population**: Patient characteristics, biomarker criteria, staging249- **Evidence Review**: Systematic literature synthesis, guideline summary, trial data250- **Treatment Options**: Available therapies with mechanism of action251- **Evidence Grading**: GRADE assessment for each recommendation (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)252- **Recommendations by Line**: First-line, second-line, subsequent therapies253- **Biomarker-Guided Selection**: Decision criteria based on molecular profiles254- **Treatment Algorithms**: TikZ flowcharts showing decision pathways255- **Monitoring Protocol**: Safety assessments, efficacy monitoring, dose modifications256- **Special Populations**: Elderly, renal/hepatic impairment, comorbidities257- **References**: Full bibliography with trial names and citations258259## Output Format260261**MANDATORY FIRST PAGE REQUIREMENT:**262- **Page 1**: Full-page executive summary with 3-5 colored tcolorbox elements263- **Page 2**: Table of contents (optional)264- **Page 3+**: Detailed sections with methods, results, figures, tables265266**Document Specifications:**267- **Primary**: LaTeX/PDF with 0.5in margins for compact, data-dense presentation268- **Length**: Typically 5-15 pages (1 page executive summary + 4-14 pages detailed content)269- **Style**: Publication-ready, pharmaceutical-grade, suitable for regulatory submissions270- **First Page**: Always a complete executive summary spanning entire page 1 (see Document Structure section)271272**Visual Elements:**273- **Colors**: 274 - Page 1 boxes: blue=data/information, green=biomarkers/recommendations, yellow/orange=clinical implications, red=warnings275 - Recommendation boxes (green=strong recommendation, yellow=conditional, blue=research needed)276 - Biomarker stratification (color-coded molecular subtypes)277 - Statistical significance (color-coded p-values, hazard ratios)278- **Tables**: 279 - Demographics with baseline characteristics280 - Biomarker frequency by subgroup281 - Outcomes table (ORR, PFS, OS, DOR by molecular subtype)282 - Adverse events by cohort283 - Evidence summary tables with GRADE ratings284- **Figures**: 285 - Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank p-values and number at risk tables286 - Waterfall plots showing best response by patient287 - Forest plots for subgroup analyses with confidence intervals288 - TikZ decision algorithm flowcharts289 - Swimmer plots for individual patient timelines290- **Statistics**: Hazard ratios with 95% CI, p-values, median survival times, landmark survival rates291- **Compliance**: De-identification per HIPAA Safe Harbor, confidentiality notices for proprietary data292293## Integration294295This skill integrates with:296- **scientific-writing**: Citation management, statistical reporting, evidence synthesis297- **clinical-reports**: Medical terminology, HIPAA compliance, regulatory documentation298- **scientific-schematics**: TikZ flowcharts for decision algorithms and treatment pathways299- **treatment-plans**: Individual patient applications of cohort-derived insights (bidirectional)300301## Key Differentiators from Treatment-Plans Skill302303**Clinical Decision Support (this skill):**304- **Audience**: Pharmaceutical companies, clinical researchers, guideline committees, medical affairs305- **Scope**: Population-level analyses, evidence synthesis, guideline development306- **Focus**: Biomarker stratification, statistical comparisons, evidence grading307- **Output**: Multi-page analytical documents (5-15 pages typical) with extensive figures and tables308- **Use Cases**: Drug development, regulatory submissions, clinical practice guidelines, medical strategy309- **Example**: "Analyze 60 HER2+ breast cancer patients by hormone receptor status with survival outcomes"310311**Treatment-Plans Skill:**312- **Audience**: Clinicians, patients, care teams313- **Scope**: Individual patient care planning314- **Focus**: SMART goals, patient-specific interventions, monitoring plans315- **Output**: Concise 1-4 page actionable care plans316- **Use Cases**: Bedside clinical care, EMR documentation, patient-centered planning317- **Example**: "Create treatment plan for a 55-year-old patient with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes"318319**When to use each:**320- Use **clinical-decision-support** for: cohort analyses, biomarker stratification studies, treatment guideline development, pharmaceutical strategy documents321- Use **treatment-plans** for: individual patient care plans, treatment protocols for specific patients, bedside clinical documentation322323## Example Usage324325### Patient Cohort Analysis326327**Example 1: NSCLC Biomarker Stratification**328```329> Analyze a cohort of 45 NSCLC patients stratified by PD-L1 expression (<1%, 1-49%, ≥50%) 330> receiving pembrolizumab. Include outcomes: ORR, median PFS, median OS with hazard ratios 331> comparing PD-L1 ≥50% vs <50%. Generate Kaplan-Meier curves and waterfall plot.332```333334**Example 2: GBM Molecular Subtype Analysis**335```336> Generate cohort analysis for 30 GBM patients classified into Cluster 1 (Mesenchymal-Immune-Active) 337> and Cluster 2 (Proneural) molecular subtypes. Compare outcomes including median OS, 6-month PFS rate, 338> and response to TMZ+bevacizumab. Include biomarker profile table and statistical comparison.339```340341**Example 3: Breast Cancer HER2 Cohort**342```343> Analyze 60 HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-deruxtecan, 344> stratified by prior trastuzumab exposure (yes/no). Include ORR, DOR, median PFS with forest plot 345> showing subgroup analyses by hormone receptor status, brain metastases, and number of prior lines.346```347348### Treatment Recommendation Report349350**Example 1: HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Guidelines**351```352> Create evidence-based treatment recommendations for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer including 353> biomarker-guided therapy selection. Use GRADE system to grade recommendations for first-line 354> (trastuzumab+pertuzumab+taxane), second-line (trastuzumab-deruxtecan), and third-line options. 355> Include decision algorithm flowchart based on brain metastases, hormone receptor status, and prior therapies.356```357358**Example 2: Advanced NSCLC Treatment Algorithm**359```360> Generate treatment recommendation report for advanced NSCLC based on PD-L1 expression, EGFR mutation, 361> ALK rearrangement, and performance status. Include GRADE-graded recommendations for each molecular subtype, 362> TikZ flowchart for biomarker-directed therapy selection, and evidence tables from KEYNOTE-189, FLAURA, 363> and CheckMate-227 trials.364```365366**Example 3: Multiple Myeloma Line-of-Therapy Sequencing**367```368> Create treatment algorithm for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma through relapsed/refractory setting. 369> Include GRADE recommendations for transplant-eligible vs ineligible, high-risk cytogenetics considerations, 370> and sequencing of daratumumab, carfilzomib, and CAR-T therapy. Provide flowchart showing decision points 371> at each line of therapy.372```373374## Key Features375376### Biomarker Classification377- Genomic: Mutations, CNV, gene fusions378- Expression: RNA-seq, IHC scores379- Molecular subtypes: Disease-specific classifications380- Clinical actionability: Therapy selection guidance381382### Outcome Metrics383- Survival: OS (overall survival), PFS (progression-free survival)384- Response: ORR (objective response rate), DOR (duration of response), DCR (disease control rate)385- Quality: ECOG performance status, symptom burden386- Safety: Adverse events, dose modifications387388### Statistical Methods389- Survival analysis: Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests390- Group comparisons: t-tests, chi-square, Fisher's exact391- Effect sizes: Hazard ratios, odds ratios with 95% CI392- Significance: p-values, multiple testing corrections393394### Evidence Grading395396**GRADE System**397- **1A**: Strong recommendation, high-quality evidence398- **1B**: Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence 399- **2A**: Weak recommendation, high-quality evidence400- **2B**: Weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence401- **2C**: Weak recommendation, low-quality evidence402403**Recommendation Strength**404- **Strong**: Benefits clearly outweigh risks405- **Conditional**: Trade-offs exist, patient values important406- **Research**: Insufficient evidence, clinical trials needed407408## Best Practices409410### For Cohort Analyses4114121. **Patient Selection Transparency**: Clearly document inclusion/exclusion criteria, patient flow, and reasons for exclusions4132. **Biomarker Clarity**: Specify assay methods, platforms (e.g., FoundationOne, Caris), cut-points, and validation status4143. **Statistical Rigor**: 415 - Report hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals, not just p-values416 - Include median follow-up time for survival analyses417 - Specify statistical tests used (log-rank, Cox regression, Fisher's exact)418 - Account for multiple comparisons when appropriate4194. **Outcome Definitions**: Use standard criteria:420 - Response: RECIST 1.1, iRECIST for immunotherapy421 - Adverse events: CTCAE version 5.0422 - Performance status: ECOG or Karnofsky4235. **Survival Data Presentation**:424 - Median OS/PFS with 95% CI425 - Landmark survival rates (6-month, 12-month, 24-month)426 - Number at risk tables below Kaplan-Meier curves427 - Censoring clearly indicated4286. **Subgroup Analyses**: Pre-specify subgroups; clearly label exploratory vs pre-planned analyses4297. **Data Completeness**: Report missing data and how it was handled430431### For Treatment Recommendation Reports4324331. **Evidence Grading Transparency**: 434 - Use GRADE system consistently (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)435 - Document rationale for each grade436 - Clearly state quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, very low)4372. **Comprehensive Evidence Review**: 438 - Include phase 3 randomized trials as primary evidence439 - Supplement with phase 2 data for emerging therapies440 - Note real-world evidence and meta-analyses441 - Cite trial names (e.g., KEYNOTE-189, CheckMate-227)4423. **Biomarker-Guided Recommendations**:443 - Link specific biomarkers to therapy recommendations444 - Specify testing methods and validated assays445 - Include FDA/EMA approval status for companion diagnostics4464. **Clinical Actionability**: Every recommendation should have clear implementation guidance4475. **Decision Algorithm Clarity**: TikZ flowcharts should be unambiguous with clear yes/no decision points4486. **Special Populations**: Address elderly, renal/hepatic impairment, pregnancy, drug interactions4497. **Monitoring Guidance**: Specify safety labs, imaging, and frequency4508. **Update Frequency**: Date recommendations and plan for periodic updates451452### General Best Practices4534541. **First Page Executive Summary (MANDATORY)**: 455 - ALWAYS create a complete executive summary on page 1 that spans the entire first page456 - Use 3-5 colored tcolorbox elements to highlight key findings457 - No table of contents or detailed sections on page 1458 - Use `\thispagestyle{empty}` and end with `\newpage`459 - This is the single most important page - it should be scannable in 60 seconds4602. **De-identification**: Remove all 18 HIPAA identifiers before document generation (Safe Harbor method)4613. **Regulatory Compliance**: Include confidentiality notices for proprietary pharmaceutical data4624. **Publication-Ready Formatting**: Use 0.5in margins, professional fonts, color-coded sections4635. **Reproducibility**: Document all statistical methods to enable replication4646. **Conflict of Interest**: Disclose pharmaceutical funding or relationships when applicable4657. **Visual Hierarchy**: Use colored boxes consistently (blue=data, green=biomarkers, yellow/orange=recommendations, red=warnings)466467## References468469See the `references/` directory for detailed guidance on:470- Patient cohort analysis and stratification methods471- Treatment recommendation development472- Clinical decision algorithms473- Biomarker classification and interpretation474- Outcome analysis and statistical methods475- Evidence synthesis and grading systems476477## Templates478479See the `assets/` directory for LaTeX templates:480- `cohort_analysis_template.tex` - Biomarker-stratified patient cohort analysis with statistical comparisons481- `treatment_recommendation_template.tex` - Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines with GRADE grading482- `clinical_pathway_template.tex` - TikZ decision algorithm flowcharts for treatment sequencing483- `biomarker_report_template.tex` - Molecular subtype classification and genomic profile reports484485**Template Features:**486- 0.5in margins for compact presentation487- Color-coded recommendation boxes488- Professional tables for demographics, biomarkers, outcomes489- Built-in support for Kaplan-Meier curves, waterfall plots, forest plots490- GRADE evidence grading tables491- Confidentiality headers for pharmaceutical documents492493## Scripts494495See the `scripts/` directory for analysis and visualization tools:496- `generate_survival_analysis.py` - Kaplan-Meier curve generation with log-rank tests, hazard ratios, 95% CI497- `create_waterfall_plot.py` - Best response visualization for cohort analyses498- `create_forest_plot.py` - Subgroup analysis visualization with confidence intervals499- `create_cohort_tables.py` - Demographics, biomarker frequency, and outcomes tables500- `build_decision_tree.py` - TikZ flowchart generation for treatment algorithms501- `biomarker_classifier.py` - Patient stratification algorithms by molecular subtype502- `calculate_statistics.py` - Hazard ratios, Cox regression, log-rank tests, Fisher's exact503- `validate_cds_document.py` - Quality and compliance checks (HIPAA, statistical reporting standards)504- `grade_evidence.py` - Automated GRADE assessment helper for treatment recommendations505506