Cross-Market Slate
One concept, many countries. Runs a separate geo-constrained search per market, profiles the finds, and normalizes everything into a market × tier matrix so a holding-company strategist can staff the same campaign idea across regions — and see, honestly, where the corpus is too thin to staff locally.
Read first: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/shared/conventions.md (tool schemas, credit prices, the nine conventions — esp. #9 multi-target slates). This skill honors thrifty/thorough credit modes (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/shared/credit-modes.md), Refusal Recovery (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/shared/refusal-recovery.md), and the Freshness Gate (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/shared/freshness-gate.md).
The slate axis here is geography — one concept, N markets. If the user's targets are distinct creator archetypes in one market, use
brief-to-shortlist(it slates per archetype per convention 9). If there's only one market, that's justbrief-to-shortlist.
Precision & filters for outreach (convention 14). When this list will feed an outreach step, default to precision over raw recall: search
precision: "tight"with the hard-gate filters the brief supports (platform,niche,data_freshness_days,content_format,audience_country), and reservebroadplus heavylookalikeunioning for market sizing. Do not fan out dozens oflookalikecalls to hit a volume target (each hop drifts from the seed), and trim the weak tail by each result rowrelative_fit(within-set fit,1.0= strongest) rather than padding to a round number. Canon:${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/shared/conventions.mdconvention 14.
Inputs to collect
- The concept (required) — one brief/campaign description, market-agnostic.
- The markets (required) — the list of countries (and cities, if they matter). If absent, ask once: "Which markets should I staff this in?"
- Per-market slate size — default 5 per market. Don't ask if implied.
- Tier intent (optional) — macro/mid/micro mix if the concept implies one.
- Credit mode — default
thorough;thriftyon trigger phrases. For5 markets, proactively flag the multiplied cost.
Flow
Step 0 — Normalize the concept once (no tool call). Produce one structured, market-agnostic campaign description (audience, vertical, vibe words, platform, tier). This single normalized brief feeds every market search — consistency across markets is the point.
Step 1 — One search per market (convention 9). Never one merged search. For each market:
search_creators {
"mode": "brief",
"brief": "<the normalized concept, ≤2000 chars, vibe words kept>",
"filters": {
"country": "<this market>",
"city": "<if specified>",
"platform": "<if the concept names one>",
"min_followers": <tier floor if set>,
"max_followers": <tier ceiling if set>,
"audience_country": "<this market — use INSTEAD OF/alongside country when the ask is reach-in-market (audience located here), not creator location; pair with min_audience_country_share>",
"data_freshness_days": <if the slate wants recently-active creators per market>,
"content_format": "<personality_led | faceless_clip — if the concept implies a format>"
},
"limit": <2× per-market slate size>,
"precision": "balanced"
}
country (creator location) is the per-market differentiator by default;
when the campaign's real ask is reach in-market rather than a locally-based
creator, use audience_country (+ min_audience_country_share) as the
per-market axis instead — creators whose audience skews to that market. Both
are advisory hard gates; everything else is held constant
so markets are comparable. Thorough: limit = 2× slate size per market.
Thrifty: limit = slate size, precision "tight".
Credit estimate fires here. Cost multiplies by market count: a 4-market run at default is 4 searches + ~40 profiles + 1 rate ≈ 53 credits — well over the threshold, so state it and offer thrifty before fanning out (don't block).
Step 2 — Thin-market detection (convention 8 applied to geo). If a market's search returns few exact in-market fits, do NOT pad with off-geo creators. Flag the market "needs local sourcing" and disclose how thin it was. Offer exactly one labeled broaden step for that market only (city → country → region), marking results as exact-market vs broadened. Markets that clear stay exact; thin ones are honestly flagged, never quietly backfilled.
Step 3 — Profile fan-out. get_creator_profile per candidate per market,
using the identifier type the search returns:
get_creator_profile { "identifier": { "type": "creatorland_user_id", "creatorland_user_id": "<id from search result>" } }
Thorough: profile every candidate. Thrifty: profile only the per-market final cut (slate size + 1).
Step 4 — Freshness Gate per market. Classify fresh / aging / stale; stale go to "re-verify before pitch" (thrifty: may drop, noting counts).
Step 5 — One rate call for the concept's vertical. Exactly one
query_market_intelligence for shared band context across all markets,
wrapped in Refusal Recovery:
query_market_intelligence { "mode": "rate", "vertical": "<the concept's vertical>", "creator_tier": "<the concept's target tier — if the brief names one or the candidate cut clusters at one>" }
If refused, walk the ladder (thorough: until clearance; thrifty: max 2 rungs) and disclose the clearance level. One band, framed as cross-market context — the corpus has no per-market rate granularity, and the deliverable says so.
When the concept targets a defined creator tier (or the candidate cut clusters
at one), pass creator_tier (emerging <1k / nano 1k-10k / micro 10k-100k / mid 100k-500k / macro 500k-1M / mega 1M+) for a
size-scoped band; when tier is mixed or unknown keep the vertical-wide band as
the fallback and say so. A tier too thin for the distinct-creator privacy floor
auto-broadens (disclosed) to the all-tier band.
Deliverable
# Cross-Market Slate — <concept name>
_One concept, <K> markets · <date> · <N> creators · Creatorland Data_
## The concept, as I read it
<the normalized block from step 0, market-agnostic, 3–5 lines>
## Slate matrix (market × tier)
| Market | Macro | Mid | Micro | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US | @<h> | @<h>, @<h> | @<h> | staffed |
| UK | @<h> | @<h> | — | staffed |
| DE | — | @<h> | — | ⚠ thin — needs local sourcing |
| BR | @<h> (broadened to country) | @<h> | @<h> | broadened |
<cells hold handles; — = no in-corpus fit at that tier>
## Per-market detail
### US — staffed
| Creator | Tier | Audience geo | Fit | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @<handle> (<platform>) | <tier> | <top geos> | exact-market \| broadened (<step>) | fresh \| aging |
<repeat per market>
## Indicative rate context (concept-level)
Market band for the **<vertical>** vertical<, broadened per note>:
p25 $<x> · median $<y> · p75 $<z> — <deal volume / recency>.
> <provenance line exactly as the tool returned it>
This is one vertical band, **not market-specific pricing** — the corpus has no
per-country rate dimension. Local market rates will vary; use as directional
context. <If broadened: disclose clearance level.>
## Markets needing local sourcing
<each thin market, how thin, and what the broaden step surfaced; or "None —
all markets cleared in-corpus.">
## Re-verify before pitch
<stale creators by market; or "None.">
## Caveats
- Rate band is single-vertical and cross-market; per-country pricing isn't in
the corpus.
- "Thin market" reflects corpus coverage, not the real talent supply in that
country — flag means source locally, not "no creators exist there".
- Broadened picks are disclosed (step labeled per row), not exact-market fits.
- No creator contact info is included or available via this tool; route
outreach through Creatorland connections or the creators' public profiles.
---
Data freshness: <N>/<M> creators synced within the last sync window; <K> flagged for re-verification.
Provenance: Creatorland Data MCP · <K> market searches + <M> profiles + 1 rate benchmark (<clearance level>) · <date>.
Credits used this run: ~<N> (<K> searches ×2 + <M> profiles ×1 + <R> market-intel ×5).
Honesty rules
- Thin markets are flagged "needs local sourcing", never backfilled with off-geo creators to make the matrix look full (convention 8).
- Every broadened pick is labeled with its broaden step; markets that cleared in-corpus stay marked exact.
- The rate band is one vertical, cross-market — never presented as per-country pricing.
- Disclose Refusal Recovery broadening at the clearance level, always.
- Stale data never silently mixes into a market's slate.
- Never imply access to creator contact info (convention 7).
Credit footprint
thorough (4 markets, slate 5): ~53 credits (4 searches ×2 + ~40 profiles + 1 rate call ×5; +5 per refusal rung) · thrifty: ~31 credits (4 searches ×2 + ~24 final-cut profiles + 1 rate call ×5, max 2 rungs). Scales with market count — estimate stated up front.