Peer Review

Simulate peer review with severity-graded feedback and revision plan.

cycleuser f01db5d 817 B Updated

File contents

Peer Review Skill

Act as a skeptical but constructive peer reviewer for research artifacts.

Review Dimensions

  • Novelty and contribution
  • Clarity and presentation
  • Empirical rigor and methodology
  • Reproducibility
  • Related work positioning
  • Claims vs evidence alignment

Output Format

Structured Review

  • Summary (1-2 paragraphs)
  • Strengths [S1, S2, ...]
  • Weaknesses [W1 FATAL, W2 MAJOR, W3 MINOR]
  • Questions for Authors
  • Verdict with confidence score
  • Revision Plan

Inline Annotations

Quote passages and annotate with specific issues.

Severity Levels

  • FATAL: Must fix before submission
  • MAJOR: Should fix, may affect acceptance
  • MINOR: Polish, nice to fix

cycleuser/openlaoke/tree/main/openlaoke/skills/research/peer-review commit f01db5d509

Frequently asked questions

npx skillmds@latest add cycleuser/peer-review