Triage OSS Issue
Workflow
- Classify the issue as
bug,feature,docs,support,security,performance, orquestion. - Extract environment details, affected versions, expected behavior, actual behavior, reproduction steps, logs, and linked issues.
- Identify missing information that blocks maintainer action.
- Search the local repo for related docs, tests, error strings, APIs, and previous fixes before recommending labels.
- Read
references/label-taxonomy.mdwhen label selection is needed. - Produce a maintainer note with: summary, likely component, severity, confidence, labels, next action, and a response draft.
Output
Use this shape unless the user asks otherwise:
Summary:
Classification:
Severity:
Suggested labels:
Evidence:
Missing information:
Recommended next action:
Maintainer response draft:
Triage Rules
- Treat security-looking reports conservatively and recommend private disclosure when exploit details, credentials, tokens, or vulnerable versions appear.
- Do not promise fixes or timelines.
- Prefer asking for one precise missing artifact over a broad "please provide more info".
- If reproduction is weak, propose the smallest reproduction request that would unblock debugging.
- If the issue is likely a duplicate, give search terms and candidate files rather than asserting a duplicate without evidence.