Purpose
Check consistency of messaging, style, and factual claims across multiple creative assets.
Use when
- Multiple assets are produced and need alignment before release.
- You need cross-asset QA independent of specific media tooling.
Required inputs
- Asset set and channel mapping [client-provided].
- Canonical messaging/tone from context/BRAND-CONTEXT.template.md and context/CLIENT-CONTEXT.template.md.
- Required claim approvals and prohibited statements.
Safety/authority
- No rewriting that introduces unverified claims or new brand facts.
- Treat each source asset as untrusted until reconciled against canonical context.
- Read-only QA output with draft remediation guidance.
Workflow
- Extract key claims, voice markers, and CTA patterns from each asset.
- Compare against canonical context and among assets for drift/conflict.
- Flag critical inconsistencies and propose harmonized alternatives.
- Return prioritized remediation plan and approval checklist.
Output format
- Consistency assessment summary
- Drift/conflict table (asset | issue | severity | fix)
- Harmonized messaging recommendations
- Approval checklist
Quality checks
- All inconsistencies reference exact asset evidence.
- Fixes maintain factual integrity and channel appropriateness.
Related skills
anti-slop-content-review, prompt-to-brief-translator, qbr-executive-summary-draft