Lead Qualification

Run BANT/MEDDIC-inspired qualification with evidence vs unknown separation.

danthamanvoiss Updated

File contents

Purpose

Assess lead quality using evidence-backed qualification criteria and recommend next action.

Use when

  • A new lead or referral needs prioritization.
  • Pipeline review requires clear fit/confidence scoring.

Required inputs

  • Lead/account details supplied by user.
  • Current offer scope from brand context.
  • Any known timeline, budget, or decision process notes.

Safety/authority

  • No fabricated prospect facts.
  • No legal, financial, or guaranteed-outcome claims.
  • If data is missing, mark unknown instead of guessing.

Workflow

  1. Map evidence to BANT/MEDDIC-style dimensions.
  2. Separate known evidence from assumptions and unknowns.
  3. Identify blockers, risks, and required discovery questions.
  4. Recommend qualification status and next step.

Output format

- Qualification summary
- Evidence table (criterion | evidence | confidence)
- Unknowns to validate
- Recommendation: pursue | nurture | disqualify
- Next questions

Quality checks

  • Every claim has supporting input or is marked unknown.
  • Recommendation aligns with evidence quality.

Related skills

discovery-call-prep, proposal-scope-draft, salesportl-account-handoff

danthamanvoiss/SalesPortl-Agency-Skills-Suite-v01-import/tree/main/lead-qualification commit 51a610fb66

Frequently asked questions

npx skillmds@latest add danthamanvoiss/lead-qualification