diegosouzapw API Security Testing Workflow
Overview
This public intake copy packages plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/api-security-testing from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses the external_source block in metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
API Security Testing Workflow
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: API Security Checklist, Quality Gates, Limitations.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
- Testing REST API security
- Assessing GraphQL endpoints
- Validating API authentication
- Testing API rate limiting
- Bug bounty API testing
- Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: API security testing workflow for REST and GraphQL APIs covering authentication, authorization, rate limiting, input validation, and security best practices.
Operating Table
| Situation | Start here | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| First-time use | metadata.json |
Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path through the external_source block before touching the copied workflow |
| Provenance review | ORIGIN.md |
Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source |
| Workflow execution | SKILL.md |
Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution |
| Supporting context | SKILL.md |
Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package |
| Handoff decision | ## Related Skills |
Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts |
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
- api-fuzzing-bug-bounty - API fuzzing
- scanning-tools - API scanning
- Enumerate endpoints
- Document API methods
- Identify parameters
- Map data flows
- Review documentation
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: Workflow Phases
Phase 1: API Discovery
Skills to Invoke
api-fuzzing-bug-bounty- API fuzzingscanning-tools- API scanning
Actions
- Enumerate endpoints
- Document API methods
- Identify parameters
- Map data flows
- Review documentation
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @api-fuzzing-bug-bounty to discover API endpoints
Phase 2: Authentication Testing
Skills to Invoke
broken-authentication- Auth testingapi-security-best-practices- API auth
Actions
- Test API key validation
- Test JWT tokens
- Test OAuth2 flows
- Test token expiration
- Test refresh tokens
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @broken-authentication to test API authentication
Phase 3: Authorization Testing
Skills to Invoke
idor-testing- IDOR testing
Actions
- Test object-level authorization
- Test function-level authorization
- Test role-based access
- Test privilege escalation
- Test multi-tenant isolation
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @idor-testing to test API authorization
Phase 4: Input Validation
Skills to Invoke
api-fuzzing-bug-bounty- API fuzzingsql-injection-testing- Injection testing
Actions
- Test parameter validation
- Test SQL injection
- Test NoSQL injection
- Test command injection
- Test XXE injection
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @api-fuzzing-bug-bounty to fuzz API parameters
Phase 5: Rate Limiting
Skills to Invoke
api-security-best-practices- Rate limiting
Actions
- Test rate limit headers
- Test brute force protection
- Test resource exhaustion
- Test bypass techniques
- Document limitations
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @api-security-best-practices to test rate limiting
Phase 6: GraphQL Testing
Skills to Invoke
api-fuzzing-bug-bounty- GraphQL fuzzing
Actions
- Test introspection
- Test query depth
- Test query complexity
- Test batch queries
- Test field suggestions
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @api-fuzzing-bug-bounty to test GraphQL security
Phase 7: Error Handling
Skills to Invoke
api-security-best-practices- Error handling
Actions
- Test error messages
- Check information disclosure
- Test stack traces
- Verify logging
- Document findings
Copy-Paste Prompts
Use @api-security-best-practices to audit API error handling
Imported: Related Workflow Bundles
security-audit- Security auditingweb-security-testing- Web securityapi-development- API development
Imported: Overview
Specialized workflow for testing REST and GraphQL API security including authentication, authorization, rate limiting, input validation, and API-specific vulnerabilities.
Imported: API Security Checklist
- Authentication working
- Authorization enforced
- Input validated
- Rate limiting active
- Errors sanitized
- Logging enabled
- CORS configured
- HTTPS enforced
Examples
Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly
Use @api-security-testing to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.
Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @api-security-testing against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.
Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @api-security-testing for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.
Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @api-security-testing using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.
Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
- Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
- Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
- Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
- Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
- Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
- Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.
Troubleshooting
Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically
Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/api-security-testing, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all.
Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Check the external_source block first, then restate the provenance before continuing.
Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review
Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task.
Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization
Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
Related Skills
@00-andruia-consultant- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@00-andruia-consultant-v2- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@10-andruia-skill-smith- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.@10-andruia-skill-smith-v2- Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
Additional Resources
Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.
| Resource family | What it gives the reviewer | Example path |
|---|---|---|
references |
copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream | references/n/a |
examples |
worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream | examples/n/a |
scripts |
upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation | scripts/n/a |
agents |
routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package | agents/n/a |
assets |
supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package | assets/n/a |
Imported Reference Notes
Imported: Quality Gates
- All endpoints tested
- Vulnerabilities documented
- Remediation provided
- Report generated
Imported: Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.